Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread

[the cac mamba]

Why weren't we saying we didn't have the money when they cut the corporate tax rate? Why were they saying that when the Fed started buying junk bonds and printing all this money to buy corporate debt?

When the wealthy are in danger they move hell and high water to fix stuff but when the common citizens need help it's we can't afford it.

you know that letting people keep more of their own money is not the same as creating more of it out of thin air, right

and i'm fine with the dems going back in and raising that shyt

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

So $850 per person? Isn't that less than the last stimulus?

No

1200 x2
500 x 2 (credit for kids)

 

[88m3]

so you're

-clapping at failure. nancy's strategy wasn't the only way to go, dikkhead. i literally just laid out a different one
-doing nothing about any of this in real life, just whining on the coli

you're my hero

You're arguing for austerity and for the Republicans to do whatever they want. While you pretend to care about what happens to people and you're a liberal?



that isn't how any of that works

 

[the cac mamba]

You're arguing for austerity and for the Republicans to do whatever they want. While you pretend to care about what happens to people and you're a liberal?



that isn't how any of that works

i'm stating the fact that there's no bill passed, and there was a different way to attack this

the above statement is not incorrect in any way, shape or form

 

[88m3]

No

1200 x2
500 x 2 (credit for kids)

Trump is cancer

 

[winb83]

you know that letting people keep more of their own money is not the same as creating more of it out of thin air, right

and i'm fine with the dems going back in and raising that shyt

Letting people keep more of their own money while the government is running huge deficits? If you spend more than you make then ontop of that further reduce your income that's effectively the same thing.

Reducing taxes so large corporations can take that money and buy back their own stocks in a shell game designed to enrich the wealthy further while the common wages have been stagnant for a long time.

It's always trickle down economics. Give more money to rich people that don't really need it. If they gave those tax breaks to the poor and Middle class what do you think they'd do with all that extra money? Do you think they'd save it and be frugal with it or do you think it would just end up in rich folks pockets when the poor and Middle class go shipping due to lifestyle creep from having more money?

 

[the cac mamba]

Letting people keep more of their own money while the government is running huge deficits? If you spend more than you make then ontop of that further reduce your income that's effectively the same thing.

Reducing taxes so large corporations can take that money and buy back their own stocks in a shell game designed to enrich the wealthy further while the common wages have been stagnant for a long time.

It's always trickle down economics. Give more money to rich people that don't really need it. If they gave those tax breaks to the poor and Middle class what do you think they'd do with all that extra money? Do you think they'd save it and be frugal with it or do you think it would just end up in rich folks pockets when the poor and Middle class go shipping due to lifestyle creep from having more money?

i just said i support raising taxes again but the fact is that printing money and letting the rich keep more of their own money is not the same thing

 

[winb83]

i just said i support raising taxes again but the fact is that printing money and letting the rich keep more of their own money is not the same thing

It is when the government cuts taxes while running huge deficits.

 

[the cac mamba]

It is when the government cuts taxes while running huge deficits.

no, it isnt they're two different things. they will never be the same exact thing

 

[mastermind]

You want the Democrats to give in and bend to the will of the Republicans, yet you want to criticize them for doing just that.

You can't have it both ways.

I pointed this out to that loser a few days ago and he had no response. Dude contradicted himself within hours.

He cannot help but debate in bad faith.

 

[winb83]

no, it isnt they're two different things. they will never be the same exact thing

If the government is spending more than it brings in then they're inventing money from nothing and building a larger deficit. You're trying to act like how you get to the same exact destination is important. If you end up in the same exact place then that's what really matters.

Giving rich people that don't really need it large amounts of money is a waste. Giving poor and middle class people who will just turn around and spend it more money is a great idea.

 

[the cac mamba]

If the government is spending more than it brings in then they're inventing money from nothing and building a larger deficit. You're trying to act like how you get to the same exact destination is important. If you end up in the same exact place then that's what really matters.

Giving rich people that don't really need it large amounts of money is a waste. Giving poor and middle class people who will just turn around and spend it more money is a great idea.

i dont disagree, but im sorry; it's still not the same thing

 

[CBalla]

i dont disagree, but im sorry; it's still not the same thing

Is it true Pelosi raised the price whenever dems and repubs were close to agreeing?

 

[the cac mamba]

Is it true Pelosi raised the price whenever dems and repubs were close to agreeing?

i didnt hear that

 

[CBalla]

i didnt hear that

Yea I couldnt find a news article on it either

@88m3 fukk off my dikk for asking a simple question