Someone pull out that @the cac mamba argument playbookno i didntwhat the fukk are you talking about?
Every time the dems fold you on they ass.... every time they hold strong you on they ass. Make your mind up you sloppy muthafukka
Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread
- Thread starter wire28
- Start date
Every time the dems fold you on they ass.... every time they hold strong you on they ass. Make your mind up you sloppy muthafukka
nikka get the fukk off my dikk@CountryBalla your boy trump still winning?
let me know when "holding strong" works hereSomeone pull out that @the cac mamba argument playbook
Every time the dems fold you on they ass.... every time they hold strong you on they ass. Make your mind up you sloppy muthafukka
im sorry i cant help but notice the fact that it isntLet some tell it you must slurp up the dems no matter what they dolet me know when "holding strong" works here
you can't tell me that if the dems scrapped their bullshyt ass bill, and went to the republicans with a bill that ONLY has unemployment insurance and stimulus checks, that it wouldnt be passed by the end of the week. it makes everyone in washington look good. republican voters get that money tooLet some tell it you must slurp up the dems no matter what they do
but nah, nancy has to stuff enough free money in there for her friends in government to exploit. so no deal. sounds like a great strategy to me that puts the american people first
BK The Great
Veteran
Democrats already compromised since they were willing to go down 1 trillion if Republicans went up by 1 trillion.its clearly time for the dems to compromise
its pretty apparent they have to compromise around 400 a week, or cut the bullshyt outta their bill and do a just-unemployment bill
unless someone can explain how and what nancy is "holding out on" mcconnell when he doesnt even want to pass a bill at all
And before that Democrats compromised by giving them $500 billion to spend without any oversight.
So now Democrats are supposed to 'compromise' again by letting them fukk with the payroll tax, remove any employee protections, don't give any money to the states and also lower the unemployment benefits
How the fukk is that a compromise
Democrats have the upper hand now because Trump took the 'optics win' when he signed those executive orders but now owns the loss when that $400 doesn't show up in a week or two.
@Piff Perkins post shows it will take months to be implemented and run out in a month. So let Trump and McConnel own that and call Pelosi and bytch ass Schumer when they're ready.
maybe you can explain to me why, if the cost of giving the american people stimulus checks and unemployment would be around half a trillion dollars, the dems "need" to spend two trillion dollars?Democrats already compromised since they were willing to go down 1 trillion if Republicans went up by 1 trillion.
And before that Democrats compromised by giving them $500 billion to spend without any oversight.
So now Democrats are supposed to 'compromise' again by letting them fukk with the payroll tax, remove any employee protections, don't give any money to the states and also lower the unemployment benefits
How the fukk is that a compromise
Democrats have the upper hand now because Trump took the 'optics win' when he signed those executive orders but now owns the loss when that $400 doesn't show up in a week or two.
@Piff Perkins post shows will take months to be implemented and run out in a month. So let Trump and McConnel own that and call Pelosi and bytch ass Schumer when they're ready.
is their priority even getting this money to the american people, or the rest of what's in their bill?
you guys can defend this if you want, but im not sure why you are if you really want this money going out to people
Money for states, schools, covid testing and treatments.maybe you can explain to me why, if the cost of giving the american people stimulus checks and unemployment would be around half a trillion dollars, the dems "need" to spend two trillion dollars?
is their priority even getting this money to the american people, or the rest of what's in their bill?
you guys can defend this if you want, but im not sure why you are if you really want this money going out to people
and its funny how she was able to come down from 3 trillion dollars to 2 trillion dollars overnight, isn't it
a whole trillion dollars that went from mattering to not mattering?
It's not funny it's called negotiating dikkhead.and its funny how she was able to come down from 3 trillion dollars to 2 trillion dollars overnight, isn't it
a whole trillion dollars that went from mattering to not mattering?
It's funny how Republicans went from $1 trillion to $1 trillion, what a compromise on their part. Not sure how over a billion for a new FBI building and more billions for defense spending matters
it's negotiating in bad faith. pelosi throwing an extra trillion on there in the aftermath of a 4 trillion dollar deficit this year is a fukkin disgraceIt's not funny it's called negotiating dikkhead.
It's funny how Republicans went from $1 trillion to $1 trillion, what a compromise on their part. Not sure how over a billion for a new FBI building and more billions for defense spending matters
thats absolutely disgusting. and it didnt work, did itagain, i'm just commenting on the observable failure of the dems to get money to the american people, which i thought was the first priority. because unemployment and stimulus checks ARE COVERED in the dollar amount the republicans went up to. right?
go in front of the american people with a bill that only provides checks and unemployment, and tell them the republicans won't sign it. republicans lose that news cycle in two days. "republicans want to OK a trillion? our bill is a trillion in direct payments and unemployment for the american people". done
but people are actually giving the republicans a pass because we all know the dems' bill was fulla shyt
it's negotiating in bad faith. pelosi throwing an extra trillion on there in the aftermath of a 4 trillion dollar deficit this year is a fukkin disgrace
again, i'm just commenting on the observable failure of the dems to get money to the american people, which i thought was the first priority. because unemployment and stimulus checks ARE COVERED in the dollar amount the republicans went up to. right?
go in front of the american people with a bill that only provides checks and unemployment, and tell them the republicans won't sign it. republicans lose that news cycle in two days. "republicans want to OK a trillion? our bill is a trillion in direct payments and unemployment for the american people". done
but people are actually giving the republicans a pass because we all know the dems' bill was fulla shyt
why cant they just meet in the middle for a brief relief bill?