They don’t win one ship without draymond.
They don’t win one ship without draymond.
Were like 10 years removed from Marks tenure on the warriors and nikkas still dikk riding him its just so strangeThe Warriors would have NEVER won a title running Mark Jackson’s offense. I don’t know why y’all completely forget about the trash he had them running on offense and just focus on his defensive turnaround.
ok, we get it, u started watching hoop 4 years agoMark Jackson has 4 ghost rings right now if we being honest, he set the blueprint for the warriors
This might be the dumbest take I've ever seen on the coliDennis Rodman doesn’t know shyt about basketball.
He’s a glorified hustle player with zero skills who just so happened to play on some extremely talented teams. He’s overrated as fukk as a defender too. Who the fukk did he ever shut down?
His knowledge of the game is about equal to his talent. Take a cross-dressing alcoholic crackhead seriously brehs.
Look all I'm saying is that Mark jackson got the core players on the warriors together and he brought the winning culture to the warriors, before him the last time they made the playoffs was 2007 I'm sure they would have won even 1 title with Jackson as coach, Steph was already an all star under coach Markok, we get it, u started watching hoop 4 years ago
He got the warriors to play defense, which was a huge feat at the time.Look all I'm saying is that Mark jackson got the core players on the warriors together and he brought the winning culture to the warriors, before him the last time they made the playoffs was 2007 I'm sure they would have won even 1 title with Jackson as coach, Steph was already an all star under coach Mark
Draymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.They don’t win one ship without draymond.
Well curry and klay was expendable with kd also. Remove either one of them and they still win with kd. Y’all buggingDraymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.
I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.
Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad and his lack of shooting is what had GE playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.
Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
Defense means literally nothing to you goofys. As well as his ability to pass and see the court at a high level,Draymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.
I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.
Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad and his lack of shooting is what had GE playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.
Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
Negged. Draymond defense and ability to run the offense is a key factor why they wonDraymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.
I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.
Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad and his lack of shooting is what had GE playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.
Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
Draymond guarded Tatum?? Classic case of Draymond fans taking undue credit. No tf he didnt. Wiggins was on Tatum, klay was on brown. And Steph filled in on switches (very well surprisingly). Draymond was help if that. Who was Draymond guarding? Horford, who put up the best game of his life while Draymond was late to close outs in game 1.Defense means literally nothing to you goofys. As well as his ability to pass and see the court at a high level,
Him and wiggins on brown and Tatum played a massive role in slowing down brown and Tatum,
They won this series cause of defense, dray played better in this series then klay. Klay Can’t defend no more or was consistent
You don’t know ball
Tristan Thompson was a “key factor” for why Cleveland won. James posey was a “key factor why Boston big 3 won. Steve Kerr was a “key factor” why the bulls won. Doesn’t mean they couldn’t and wouldn’t have won without them.Negged. Draymond defense and ability to run the offense is a key factor why they won
Mark Jackson has 4 ghost rings right now if we being honest, he set the blueprint for the warriors