"Steve Kerr Ain't Coaching Sh!t"-Dennis Rodman

100Percent

Deviatin' septums
Supporter
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
1,152
Reputation
320
Daps
4,371
Reppin
Chicago
The Warriors would have NEVER won a title running Mark Jackson’s offense. I don’t know why y’all completely forget about the trash he had them running on offense and just focus on his defensive turnaround.
Were like 10 years removed from Marks tenure on the warriors and nikkas still dikk riding him its just so strange :hhh:
 

HandyWithTheSteel

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
4,045
Reputation
-1,128
Daps
31,710
Dennis Rodman doesn’t know shyt about basketball. :mjlol:

He’s a glorified hustle player with zero skills who just so happened to play on some extremely talented teams. He’s overrated as fukk as a defender too. Who the fukk did he ever shut down?

His knowledge of the game is about equal to his talent. Take a cross-dressing alcoholic crackhead seriously brehs. :mjlol:
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,727
Reputation
7,716
Daps
98,954
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
Dennis Rodman doesn’t know shyt about basketball. :mjlol:

He’s a glorified hustle player with zero skills who just so happened to play on some extremely talented teams. He’s overrated as fukk as a defender too. Who the fukk did he ever shut down?

His knowledge of the game is about equal to his talent. Take a cross-dressing alcoholic crackhead seriously brehs. :mjlol:
This might be the dumbest take I've ever seen on the coli :picard:
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
299
Reputation
20
Daps
829
ok, we get it, u started watching hoop 4 years ago :mjtf:
🤣Look all I'm saying is that Mark jackson got the core players on the warriors together and he brought the winning culture to the warriors, before him the last time they made the playoffs was 2007 I'm sure they would have won even 1 title with Jackson as coach, Steph was already an all star under coach Mark 🤷‍♂️
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
102,470
Reputation
4,979
Daps
204,454
Reppin
NULL
🤣Look all I'm saying is that Mark jackson got the core players on the warriors together and he brought the winning culture to the warriors, before him the last time they made the playoffs was 2007 I'm sure they would have won even 1 title with Jackson as coach, Steph was already an all star under coach Mark 🤷‍♂️
He got the warriors to play defense, which was a huge feat at the time.

Kerr brought the offense which took Steph to where he is now
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,797
Reputation
3,054
Daps
55,627
They don’t win one ship without draymond.
Draymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.

I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.

Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad the first few games and his lack of shooting is what had GS playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.

Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
 
Last edited:

Ineedmoney504

SOHH ICEY...WE EATIN
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
44,739
Reputation
3,479
Daps
99,542
Reppin
SOHH ICEY N.O.
Draymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.

I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.

Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad and his lack of shooting is what had GE playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.

Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
Well curry and klay was expendable with kd also. Remove either one of them and they still win with kd. Y’all bugging
 

Ineedmoney504

SOHH ICEY...WE EATIN
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
44,739
Reputation
3,479
Daps
99,542
Reppin
SOHH ICEY N.O.
Draymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.

I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.

Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad and his lack of shooting is what had GE playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.

Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
Defense means literally nothing to you goofys. As well as his ability to pass and see the court at a high level,

Him and wiggins on brown and Tatum played a massive role in slowing down brown and Tatum,

They won this series cause of defense, dray played better in this series then klay. Klay Can’t defend no more or was consistent

You don’t know ball
 

Detroit Wave

Veteran
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
23,428
Reputation
7,456
Daps
97,619
Reppin
The D
Draymond has become the Rorschach test for real hoop fans. Any fan that overvalues dude doesn’t know the game.

I MAYBE give you the first ring, but then they won 2 with KD. He was 100% expandable.

Then this one, you can make an argument he’s the only reason Boston even won 2 games. He played historically bad and his lack of shooting is what had GE playing 4 on 5, had people think Boston was the bad boy pistons.

Otto Porter would have been just fine as the starting 4. He shot 58% from 3. Looney balls out when he gets minutes. Averaged 10 and 10 in the WCF. He’s solid as their defensive anchor. They don’t need that ngga Draymond bruh
Negged. Draymond defense and ability to run the offense is a key factor why they won:camby:
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,797
Reputation
3,054
Daps
55,627
Defense means literally nothing to you goofys. As well as his ability to pass and see the court at a high level,

Him and wiggins on brown and Tatum played a massive role in slowing down brown and Tatum,

They won this series cause of defense, dray played better in this series then klay. Klay Can’t defend no more or was consistent

You don’t know ball
Draymond guarded Tatum?? 😂 Classic case of Draymond fans taking undue credit. No tf he didnt. Wiggins was on Tatum, klay was on brown. And Steph filled in on switches (very well surprisingly). Draymond was help if that. Who was Draymond guarding? Horford, who put up the best game of his life while Draymond was late to close outs in game 1.

2nd, I literally mentioned Looney for his defense

With KD, Steph is Steph and klay stretches the D. To imply they are the same as Draymond is laughable but expected from draymomd fans. and KD played the best D of his life w/ GS and averaged a career high assists. They woulda been more than fine defensively and from a playmaking standpoint

But most importantly: With KD-Steph-Klay you gotta have something ABNORMAL happen for them to even lose a game let alone a series. Yet that’s exactly what almost happened vs Houston. So what happened!!? Steph avg 26,6, and 6 on slightly less then normal shooting but nothing crazy. KD averaged 30 on good efficiency. Klay avg 19 on 50% from 3. So what the hell happened?? Draymond shot 40% from the field and went 2/17 from 3in 40 minutes per game. That’s playing 4 on 5, there’s your abnormal. Draymond fans don’t understand how causation works. GS wins in spite of Draymond, not because of him
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,797
Reputation
3,054
Daps
55,627
Negged. Draymond defense and ability to run the offense is a key factor why they won:camby:
Tristan Thompson was a “key factor” for why Cleveland won. James posey was a “key factor why Boston big 3 won. Steve Kerr was a “key factor” why the bulls won. Doesn’t mean they couldn’t and wouldn’t have won without them.

The playmaking argument is hilarious. Like imagine having 3 of the greatest shooters/offensive players of all time on a squad and thinking ‘oh no, oh God no who’s gonna do these dribble hand offs!!! We need a Draymond’. Like gtfoh. They run their offense like that because Draymond is there and he needs a role. If you take him away they’d simply run things a different way.

And the current GS roster going forward is a perfect example. You got Poole as a go-creator. You got Kuminga who’s ready to play stretch 4 and be a star. You have looney as a defensive anchor. You have Otto porter as a stretch 4. You got wiggins as another all-defense caliber wing. THEY DONT fukkING NEED HIM
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,504
Reputation
14,482
Daps
201,280
Reppin
Above the fray.
Mark Jackson has 4 ghost rings right now if we being honest, he set the blueprint for the warriors

I'll tell you what , Jackson is a class act. After they won he graciously gave Steve Kerr full credit for the job he did winning, losing, and then building another winner.

I'm a Jackson since his days as a player at SJU. If Steve Kerr won one ring after he left.....you could call him Jon Gruden, who won with a team assembled and molded by Coach Dungy.
But what Kerr was able to do this year proves once and for all his coaching talent. Especially the development of the new supporting cast of players.
 
Last edited:

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,797
Reputation
3,054
Daps
55,627
Sorry fellas but 4 rings later mark Jackson is a small, very small footnote in history. He’ll be remembered as much as Doug Collins is for Chicago, or del Harris for the lakers, or Paul westhead for the showtime lakers (and he even won a ring). Which is to say…they ain’t remembered.

Not in terms of ’well they coulda did the same thing’. It’s over for that. Kerr has as many titles as pat Riley it just is what it is. The winners write history
 
Top