That's nonsense in bold. I can Barely understand what you're trying to say btw, you're speaking that Pooty Tang. Rappers are given a "pass" saying nikka because rappers are black. White rappers don't have that pass. While Tarantino has gotten a pass from some blacks for his use of the word ****** on the strength of artistic freedom, he has caught some flack. He will get away with using it in Django because he set the movie during slavery and made it a black slave revenge flick. Theres no connection between rappers using nikka in rap songs and Tarantino using ****** in his movies. You sound just like Limbaugh.
yeah but you are the same guy that said that exploitation of hip hop music has nothing to do with race, so like i said you are not credible
Slavery isn't black culture, it's world history and has been part of cultures all over the world.
what does this have to do with anything, in the context of the django and america slavery is part of black culture and black history
You can't even explain the relevance of exploitation in the music industry to this discussion other than saying "black people get exploited in the music industry".
yeah and thats all i have to say because the connection is self evident
That's just how simple you are. You ran in here trying to make some dumbass comparison between the song NIP and the selling of slave dolls, now you're saying saying whatever to cloud the issue. Bozo the clown.Stop asking me these dumb questions that you should know the answer to yourself. Are you arguing that Django doesn't exploit slavery, or are you just making the bytch made "yea Django exploits slavery but don't say that because other movies have exploited incidents in history too" argument? Stop tap dancing and say what you have to say. What movies are you trying to compare Django to?
my arguments was that it does exploit slavery and black history/culture but it doesn't exploit it anymore than a typical rap song or any other historically based movie and overall its a good funny movie
people brought up the dolls, and i said i dont like the dolls but it doesn't seem like its anything more than the typical exploitation hollywood does and i added it doesnt seem any more exploitative than a song like nikkas in paris, in that its distasteful and some black people might be offended by it
this is news to me that the exploitation of black culture in rap music had nothing to do with race
to me its self evident that there is a connection between the music industry and hollywood, so its not a big deal to make a connection between music and a movie
but apparently you dont see race in the music industry but you see race in the movie industry, which is strange and explains your non logical arguments
because the reason you gave for a color blind music industry also applies to the movie industry and these dolls
you are the one that needs to answer the question of why its ok to do dolls of kill bill and inglorious b*stards and not do them for django? why do you think django dolls should be treated differently?
