But your mans that you claimed is never wrong said it made a considerable amount of profit, what changed?
Obviously they made a ton. That's why the spent the budget they did knowing it'd recoup easily.
Sony Milking Last Of Us 2: New Editions on the Way (Update: Confirmed)
- Thread starter Leasy
- Start date
Obviously they made a ton. That's why the spent the budget they did knowing it'd recoup easily.
Gamers have brought multiple copies of RE4, Skyrim, GTA5, Pokémon, and TLOU. Remasters, rereleases, remakes, etc. Regardless of what the name is. Y’all bruhs are going to buy it. This fake outrage is fake outrage. See y’all once the next remake, or remastered gets announced. And y’all bruhs going to be hyped for it lol. 
“What they’re remaking ______game!!!!!”
Exactly.
And to keep it funky, some of those older joints would benefit greatly from a remake.
The success of shyt like FF7 shows this (please throw that Luminous engine in the bushes though Squeenix).
But your mans that you claimed is never wrong said it made a considerable amount of profit, what changed?
Cac tweets to the rescue again
In the face of facts and numbers they got their feelings and cac tweets
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Dishonored 3 and Oblivion/FO3 Remaster
I just want that Oblivion remaster
Generously $50 per game is about what they would make on those early sales.
At 5 million sold that’s $250m
The documents said the games cost $200m to make and $100-200m to market.
They don’t really start making money till like 6-7 mill are sold. Which is why they need to keep making remakes and remasters to keep the cash flowing on that initial huge investment.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Cac tweets to the rescue again
In the face of facts and numbers they got their feelings and cac tweets
A cac you believe in
Which one of y’all gone send michael pachter an apology
I don’t see any actual quotes or numbers from him in that tweet you postedA cac you believe in
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
I don’t see any actual quotes or numbers from him in that tweet you posted
You value his opinion and you value his word, he is the cac you have the most faith in. So why doubt him now? You’ve trusted his every word since 2014
Again, where is his actual statement on the subject?You value his opinion and you value his word, he is the cac you have the most faith in. So why doubt him now?
You have a vague second hand cac tweet that says “probably”
Ezekiel 25:17
Veteran
They need to release the Remaster with Factions 2. It's almost too perfect. 
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Cac tweets to the rescue again
In the face of facts and numbers they got their feelings and cac tweets
Between the lines: Both games are sure to have been profitable, Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter and Cowen’s Doug Creutz tell Axios.
- Pachter pegs Sony’s profit on each at close to $300 million.
- His math includes cuts for marketing and physical retailers.
- It also helps that these are Sony-made games for a Sony console, so the game maker here doesn’t need to give the standard 30% cut to the platform holder. Economics for blockbusters, in other words, favor first-party games.
Sounds like your mans agrees with us.
That’s from the cac tweet dude that’s been known to just make up stuff.Between the lines: Both games are sure to have been profitable, Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter and Cowen’s Doug Creutz tell Axios.
- Pachter pegs Sony’s profit on each at close to $300 million.
- His math includes cuts for marketing and physical retailers.
- It also helps that these are Sony-made games for a Sony console, so the game maker here doesn’t need to give the standard 30% cut to the platform holder. Economics for blockbusters, in other words, favor first-party games.
Sounds like your mans agrees with us.
Where’s the transcript or actual quote from Michael Pacter on how he reached that number.
We know from the court documents it cost at least $300m to make and market the game.
To make 300m profit they would have needed to sell 10 million and pull in full profit of $60 on each individual sale. Which we know is impossible.
So in light of the math we actually know, it doesn’t matter what your cac tweet says, unless he adds some type of insight or information that we don’t know about.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
No. This is why you goofies are so susceptible to fake news, lies and propaganda just like maga republicans.What do you mean, thats a direct source
If someone is gonna source another person in a story, you as the reader should follow that source and look for confirmation/explanation yourself to make sure the writer of the story is not misrepresenting the information.
If he’s gonna just flippantly mention what some analyst “told him” he should also be linking to a source or direct quote or numbers or something in order to give readers a chance to confirm the information.
Otherwise Michale Pacter said @Gizmo_Duck momma a hoe and we all believe him
