Some more WWE Draft details - Cena moving to Smackdown? New Worlds Title?

KEEPITTRILLA

soon as i catch the vibe tell em 2 fetch th hearse
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
8,767
Reputation
487
Daps
12,365
Reppin
TX
The IC being the top smackdown title is weak because you can say definitively that it is not better than the world champ, making smackdown look weak af right out the gate. I think smackdown w/cena in the top feud for a while will give it more legitimacy than smackdown ever had besides 02-03
 

JQ Legend

Veteran
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
23,340
Reputation
12,023
Daps
71,709
How bout making the IC title the big title on Raw?

That would immediately elevate Smackdown and the IC title as well.
 

DaylitoJames

#SnitchGang Elite
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
93,879
Reputation
30,245
Daps
294,844
Reppin
Sneak Nation
Hopefully they don't break up the tag teams
That was the main thing i hated about the original Draft was that all teams got splited up... I think only JBL and Jeff Hardy benefited from that.

Stables and tag teams should be drafted as a unit instead of seperately and allow the Tag Team Champions and the Women's Champion to defend on both shows... more competition for the belts (and hopefully the Divas' Championship won't be brought back due to the draft)
 

twan83

GOAT FATHER
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,208
Reputation
7,131
Daps
55,720
Reppin
Texas
Source: The Wrestling Observer

"The Wrestling Observer is reporting that some details regarding the impending WWE Brand Extension have apparently been revealed.

The details involve who the top babyfaces and heels will likely be for both Raw and SmackDown. According to these details, WWE World Heavyweight Champion Roman Reigns will reportedly lead Raw as the show's top babyface, while Seth Rollins will serve as the show's top heel. In regards to SmackDown, John Cena will serve as that show's top babyface, while AJ Styles will take the position as the show's top heel.

Furthermore, these same details have also apparently revealed that a second world title is expected to be created for whichever show that the current champion does not end up on.

According to the report, the idea of sending Cena over to SmackDown has to do with helping to boost the show's overall image as more than just a secondary brand within WWE. According to multiple reports, the USA Network is said to have not been happy with the overall performance of both Raw and SmackDown so far this year due to low ratings, which is leading the network to have trouble selling advertising space.

It's important to note that these details have in no way whatsoever been finalized as of yet and that, as always, plans can always change by the time the WWE Draft and Brand Extension take place in July."

___


Source: GOATzer

It is still largely secretive, if things have even been figured out past the top guys, regarding what will happen with WWE talent when they do the brand split in July.

The most likely reason that the move was made, was because the USA Network was not happy with the ratings of Smackdown. The hope was that Smackdown on USA would do close to the numbers of Raw, particularly when it opened strong at around 2.7 million viewers. The reality is that WWE was not using as much primary talent on Smackdown, nor were they doing the obvious, shooting angles for matches on Mondays that would lead to Thursday. For wrestling fans, Smackdown remained no more important, nor must.see, on USA as it had been in recent years on Syfy. What shocked everyone is that ratings had fallen below what they were a year ago, even with the move to a much stronger station. While ratings werenā€™t down from last year as much as Raw, the expectation was that a Thursday night prime time show on USA would do better.

Key to this is that, even though WWE will be adding expenses by going live, USA is not paying more for the increase in costs. Itā€™s the first sign, while hidden from the public, that USA is concerned that the approximately $127 million they pay WWE this year for Raw and Smackdown is not delivering at the level they would like. Given that the key economic driver of the company is not the network but the television rights fees, in the long run, until economic conditions change greatly, ratings are still the most important barometer for the company, and they are consistently falling.


_____



Cena and Styles main eventing Smackdown every week? :blessed:

Roman Reigns :scust: and seth rollins :patrice: but having to see Roman Reigns:scust: main event RAW every week? :why:


New news

.

As noted, it's been recently reported that John Cena is favored to headline the SmackDown brand after the brand split and SmackDown goes live on July 19th. It was expected that Roman Reigns would headline the RAW brand.

While everything is always subject to change, several readers noted that the advertising for the first live SmackDown on July 19th now includes a Roman Reigns vs. Seth Rollins main event, which is likely a dark match. Other stars advertised for the show include Dean Ambrose, AJ Styles, Kevin Owens and WWE Women's Champion Charlotte.

Tickets for the following week's SmackDown at the First Niagara Center in Buffalo, NY go on sale tomorrow, and they have also released advertising with the same stars - Roman Reigns, Seth Rollins, Dean Ambrose, AJ Styles, Kevin Owens and Charlotte - as well as the New Day.



I wouldn't read too much into it right now, although it is interesting that all the updated post-brand split SmackDown advertising features Reigns and not Cena. However, the advertising also lists AJ Styles, who is expected to feud with Cena this summer unless their program is dropped after their expected match at WWE Money In The Bank.
John Cena Not On WWE SmackDown After Brand Split? - WrestlingInc.com
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
18,736
Reputation
1,071
Daps
49,848
Two world titles:reignswhat:

That's how we got the same few wrestlers stat padding the first time around.

They act like the u.s and the intercontinental titles don't exist.:beli:
 

Swagnicious

All Star
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
1,418
Reputation
920
Daps
12,300
Reppin
Swagville
The IC being the top smackdown title is weak because you can say definitively that it is not better than the world champ, making smackdown look weak af right out the gate. I think smackdown w/cena in the top feud for a while will give it more legitimacy than smackdown ever had besides 02-03

....and what title was featured on SD! in 2002 and 2003? The WWE title....

That, combined with SD! having Lesnar, Angle, and other stars, storylines and factors, was the reason why SD! was considered the OTHER A-show at the time, as opposed to the B-show it was for most other years

The WWE title will ALWAYS be seen as the top title by fans. Period. No matter what other 'world' title someone tries to come up with. Yes, there was a period when they genuinely tried to push the WHC as being equal to the WWE title....and that was upon its debut when Triple H was hogging it and using it to increase his championship reigns. He held the belt for almost 2 years combined in its first 3 years.....then his new toy finally got old in 2005, and he never touched it since (as an individual belt)

And even then, fans knew it was the 'weaker' title, which is why the WWE eventually dumped it onto SD! when it became the undisputed B-show. Dudes like Christian and Mark Henry winning it was only a big deal because they finally won a 'top' title in the company....but we all knew them winning the WWE title would have been better

So since the alternative 'world' title will be seen as #2 regardless.....why not have the IC title as the top 'world' title on a show, where they can treat it like it's actually worth something for the first time in years? Unlike the WWE's WHC or whatever new title they come up with, it already has a respected decades-long history where it was held by some of the greats; Savage, Warrior, Perfect, Bret, Shawn, Razor, Austin, Rock, Jericho, etc......

We need to be honest with ourselves: dudes like Rusev, Owens, Bray, Cesaro and Ziggler aren't winning that WWE title. I'll even throw in Ambrose and Styles. Yes, I went there.

So why not give them shine on a show where they can fight over the IC title in major feuds as if it's the WWE title? Yes technically it would be the weaker show, but wouldn't that be better than the current atmosphere of having them in forgettable throwaway IC/US title feuds that get lost in the shuffle of constantly-promoted WWE title feuds? And who knows.....depending on the show quality it could still manage to get viewership/ratings as good as Raw, or even better

At least give them a year or 2 of main-event IC title feuds on SD!, before drafting them to Raw to pretend like they have a shot at winning the WWE title when we know damn well they don't, and will just get lost in the shuffle
 
Last edited:

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,270
Reputation
8,850
Daps
169,733
Disgusting.

why?

What's the point of a brand split if you still have Brock, Rollins, Cena, AJ, Owens, Ambrose, 2-3 other "#1 contenders" for ONE belt? That doesn't help anything and you still have alot of talent being put on the backburner.
 

thaKEAF

#grizzlies #titans
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,262
Reputation
9,202
Daps
112,013
Reppin
Memphis
Swagger_682x400_1018838a.jpg

Swagger and Khali are the only ones they really got bad with the gold belt unless I'm forgetting someone. Everyone else was worthy of it.

If they're gonna keep a real brand split (something they weren't doing from like 2011-2014) it definitely makes sense to have two belts.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
123,605
Reputation
8,553
Daps
146,148
Reppin
Westcoast
The IC being the top smackdown title is weak because you can say definitively that it is not better than the world champ, making smackdown look weak af right out the gate. I think smackdown w/cena in the top feud for a while will give it more legitimacy than smackdown ever had besides 02-03
What? Lol..Like Eddie didn't run the WWF in 04 and 05..
 
Top