null
...
Breh we all know you get opinionated when it comes to languages. Let somebody mention JavaScript and you'll be ready to fist fight.
although
python >> js
Software Development and Programming Careers (Official Discussion Thread)
- Thread starter Blackking
- Start date
-
- Tags
- careers programming
although
python >> js
clicking through being easier is not really a bar worth anything to the argument. fwiw i don't like python but to say it's unusable for production is silly.i think this all implies that clicking through (i.e. changing) a java (etc) "monstrosity" is easier because of the help given by the type system.
btw python has type hints and static type checking available anyway.
oh so you really don't know what you're talking about thenalthough
python >> js
i'm half-joking but idk how someone can rail on Python for its types and/or lack thereof but say it's better than JS, at least Typescript + modern JS fix 99% of the things people used to complain about
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
I would judge you if you weren't ready when heard that.Breh we all know you get opinionated when it comes to languages
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
The fact that either of them exist is a testament to hustlin backwardsoh so you really don't know what you're talking about then
i'm half-joking but idk how someone can rail on Python for its types and/or lack thereof but say it's better than JS, at least Typescript + modern JS fix 99% of the things people used to complain about
null
...
oh so you really don't know what you're talking about then
be unfamiliar with a breh's game brehs
speak english breddah.
make a direct assertion.
is typescript js?
...yes? lmao it inarguably is, I hope you're not tryna suggest otherwisebe unfamiliar with a breh's game brehs
speak english breddah.
make a direct assertion.
is typescript js?
null
...
if you really meant aimless
"clicking through" code then my apologies.i wrongly assumed you meant looking at code to actually do work.
null
...
try janky jedi mind tricks brehs
i am not "suggesting" they are not the same i am telling you that they are not the same.
"arguably"
have you read js script the good parts?
python does not have a sin list anywhere near as long as that.
try janky jedi mind tricks brehs
i am not "suggesting" they are not the same i am telling you that they are not the same.
"arguably"
have you read js script the good parts?
python does not have a sin list anywhere near as long as that.
this is what happens when you learn about tech from youtube videos
typescript is JS. you cannot run typescript code, you run JS code because of the transpiler.
that video is FIFTEEN years old and doesn't account for any of the new versions of JS...you a junior dev? lmao
edit: wait I just double checked, this man is using "JS the good parts" to back up his argument, a book that hasn't been relevant to modern JS in a decade
I thought I was talking to actual engineers in here
Last edited:
null
...
i learned tech from 3 university degrees in it. i'm in the middle of the 3rd one.
"Douglas Crockford is an American computer programmer who is involved in the development of the JavaScript language. He specified the data format JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), and has developed various JavaScript related tools such as the static code analyzer JSLint and minifier JSMin.[1] "
and I did ask you if you have read the book.
I have.
typescript is compiled to javascript but that does not imply what you suggest.
if it did there would only be one language out there, machine code, which all languages reduce to.
that is what happens when you don't study computer science at university brehs
it is the summary of a foundational book.
reading foundational books will help you with the babbling.
-
TL;DR keeping our eye on the prize your claim is that js is typescript. that's horseshyt
you're not equipped for this convo shorty lol now that i'm paying attention to your arguments I can see you probably don't even write any code in the languages you're talking about, definitely no enterprise softwarei learned tech from 3 university degrees in it.
"Douglas Crockford is an American computer programmer who is involved in the development of the JavaScript language. He specified the data format JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), and has developed various JavaScript related tools such as the static code analyzer JSLint and minifier JSMin.[1] "
and I did ask you if you have read the book.
I have.
typescript is compiled to javascript but that does not imply what you suggest.
if it did there would only be one language out there, machine code, which all languages reduce to.
that is what happens when you don't study computer science at university brehs
it is the summary of a foundational book.
reading foundational books will help you with the babbling.
-
TL;DR keeping our eye on the prize your claim is that js is typescript. that's horseshyt
also I said TRANSPILED, not compiled
at least keep chatgpt in an other tab if you wanna pretend you know what you're talking aboutlastly re: JS the good parts...no I never read it because it was already losing relevance by the time I was a junior. can't believe i'm even talking to someone tryna use "typeof in JS sucks!" as an argument in 2024
null
...
edit: wait I just double checked, this man is using "JS the good parts" to back up his argument, a book that hasn't been relevant to modern JS in a decade
ok engineer.
why can't javascript ever have static typing whether 5, 10, 20, 30 years without breaking most non-trivial programs?
a question.
null
...
also I said TRANSPILED, not compiled
i know what you said.
it's actually compiled.
you don't have classical computer science training.
it's obvious.
engineer? in javascript