So a game that barely runs on pc...
barely runs and sold 20 million
So a game that barely runs on pc...
But I've been playing fortnite battle Royale since it launched and haven't experienced anything like this.it's a lot more complicated than that. the game needs to keep everything that happens on a huge island synced for all 100 players. the number of objects also hits the CPU hard, and that's why you'll often get bad performance in areas with a lot of buildings
pretty much all of these games (DayZ, Arma, Rust, Ark, etc) have these performance issues. they're just magnified by the weak console CPU
Yea, this shyt is still disappointing because I expected a bit more optimization even started this stage but this shyt isn't terrible in comparison to what I've seen streaming.But I've been playing fortnite battle Royale since it launched and haven't experienced anything like this.
Am i wrong, sure some pcs can run it but not the majority barely can
barely runs and sold 20 million
it's a smaller map (about 1/3 the size I think), more arcady (less sim calculations), and it's a first party Epic gameBut I've been playing fortnite battle Royale since it launched and haven't experienced anything like this.
it's tricky when you start talking about the "majority" of PC's. but 20 million is a big number, and the game runs fine on most modern 'gaming' PC'sAm i wrong, sure some pcs can run it but not the majority barely can
Bro there’s games that are cpu intensive and games that arent. Regardless of the way they look. Alot of games along the lines of PUBG are cpu intensive. This is some shyt us PC gamers been tryna say in other threads but nobody wanted to hear it. shyt. Even Fortnite Battle Royale runs better on PS4 Pro cause they were too ambitious with the One X version. Tryna run that shyt at 4K n shyt. One thing alot of console gamers dont get is that the main objective for competitive multiplayer games is performance. fukk are they tryna run PUBG in 4K on the One X for? They shouldve went 1440p. Its not like the game is great in the looks department anyway. They mightve had a better chance at keeping that locked 30fps. Not a guarantee cause of the cpu but perfomance should def be the main objective with this game...but why? It's cpu intensive because of how poorly optimized it is.
There's no reason for a game that looks like that to run so poorly.
Exactly.it's tricky when you start talking about the "majority" of PC's. but 20 million is a big number, and the game runs fine on most modern 'gaming' PC's
my gf's son plays it on a laptop i5 and a gtx 940mx. thing is he's willing to suffer potato graphics to get better performance
I understand the dilemma, cause if you release the game with extra-low graphics on the xbox, people gonna complain about that. not to mention they gonna say it looked better in pre-release videos (downgrade-athon)Exactly.
Muhfukkas like Digital Foundry got these nikkas all fukked up in the game. Console gamers talking shyt but even THEY prefer performance over graphics and they dont even know it. Its the fukkin reason that despite COD not being the best graphics in a FPS on console. It was the most successful. The shyt prioritized performance and the players FELT that shyt and couldnt live without it whether they realized why or not. They just knew the game was more responsive.I understand the dilemma, cause if you release the game with extra-low graphics on the xbox, people gonna complain about that. not to mention they gonna say it looked better in pre-release videos (downgrade-athon)
just another reason I prefer PC Gaming: I can choose what's important to me ...including spending more money on hardware
Apparently it runs like crap on the XB1X also.
Player Unknowns battlegrounds is officially on the Greenerside!!!