The advantage the Apple Vision Pro has over the quest is it has a higher resolution and more sensors. But in typical Apple fashion, you can't develop-for or sideload shyt.$500 is a great price compared to $3500+tax
The advantage the Apple Vision Pro has over the quest is it has a higher resolution and more sensors. But in typical Apple fashion, you can't develop-for or sideload shyt.$500 is a great price compared to $3500+tax
The advantage the Apple Vision Pro has over the quest is it has a higher resolution and more sensors. But in typical Apple fashion, you can't develop-for or sideload shyt.
Yep, which I understand from a security and "eco-system" standpoint but they exclude a lot of potential customers by doing that kind of shyt.everything that is probably produced for it HAS to be in house I guess...
Stop this nonsense. Apple Vision Pro is by definition a VR headset with video passthru. So is the Quest 3. It's one thing to say the Vision Pro is a better device, but it's flat out lie to say it isn't a Virtual Reality headset.Spacial computing and VR are not the same.
Nah son.. there’s piff in 8k vrAll the good porn is like 144p so this is pointless.
as i've said many times before, they've been trying to make this shyt pop off for 30 years. it never will
Who in ya avi?i want one, but the duration time is only 2.5 hours
what kind of bullshyt is that?
you gonna spend more time charging it can actually using it?
You can't compare a phone to something you put on your faceits a different ball game if apple gets into it.
if the price is better, and the device smaller, it will eventually take off.
reminds me of a thread i saw on a diff. forum before the original iphone came out. People were saying why does a phone need a camera, who tf is gonna take pictures with their shytty rez phone camera when they can carry around their actual camera. We all know how that turned out.
i'm not comparing the iphone to the vision pro.You can't compare a phone to something you put on your face
i'm not comparing the iphone to the vision pro.
i'm saying that the masses don't even know what they do or don't want. if the tech is good (ie smaller), and the price is reasonable, people will buy it.
just like the apple watch was viewed by the gen. public as useless before it was released, and yet, its been largely successful in terms of sales.
just like my example about the iphone camera.
again, if the tech is good, and the price is better, people will buy the vision pro. they will buy it over the quest or whatever else is on the market, because its made by apple.