I wish the raimi films didnt exist.
Whole generation thinking thats what spider man/peter parker is like
Whole generation thinking thats what spider man/peter parker is like
So we agree that The Amazing Spider-Man 1 and 2 are both underwhelming...(INEVITABLE SPOILERS)
- Thread starter Liquid
- Start date
The only thing great about the first trilogy is Spiderman 2. The rest were underwhelming as well.
But I've never been a big fan of Spiderman so I can't really make an accurate assessments when comparing to the comics.
But I've never been a big fan of Spiderman so I can't really make an accurate assessments when comparing to the comics.
@ the title, how did I type that out without catching itIts a fictional character breh...do you really think Heath Ledger's Joker is how people view the joker?I wish the raimi films didnt exist.
Whole generation thinking thats what spider man/peter parker is like
The first 3 films were better. The majority of people agree...the critics agree
I wanted all the attention
Nah, I feel like the original thread has too much negativity and this thread is about the franchise going forward...not just the 2nd film.
You seriously had to make another thread to shyt on the movie again? Like... For real?
spider man 3 is in my top three worst films ive ever seen. they failed to portray spider man properly or mj, at any point during all three films. who cares about film critics, same dudes thatll say video games arent art then praise pedophiles.
people are obsessed with throwin shade on ths movie online.You seriously had to make another thread to shyt on the movie again? Like... For real?
Are you mad breh?You seriously had to make another thread to shyt on the movie again? Like... For real?
I just wanted some discussions going on and people AGAIN are making the same mistake of thinking that a certain character must be fit to how they see them.
Batman alone has had like 4 different iterations, Heath Ledger's Joker is not The Joker I remember from the comics...where is the outrage?
lol you didnt want a discussion you just wanted to act as if youspeak for everyone and dump on the movie.
iv yet to met someone in real life that didnt enjoy the new movie. audience clapped at the end of it when i went.
iv yet to met someone in real life that didnt enjoy the new movie. audience clapped at the end of it when i went.
The Internet is a part of real life...whether you want to accept it or not is your own choice breh
I am speaking on behalf of many who felt like both of these films did not live up to expectations.
and maybe its because heath ledger was fukking amazing. its almost imposible to find people that hated his joker.
meanwhile its almost unanimous that tobey was fukking terible, the worst part of the movies and that garfield/stone blew maguire/dunst out of the water.
meanwhile its almost unanimous that tobey was fukking terible, the worst part of the movies and that garfield/stone blew maguire/dunst out of the water.
ohh so is that why michael bay movies are ripped apart and boycotted by everyone across the internet yet do huge numbers every single time?The Internet is a part of real life...whether you want to accept it or not is your own choice breh
I am speaking on behalf of many who felt like both of these films did not live up to expectations.
I agree with you about The Joker, I enjoyed his performance. Still not the point of the argument...the argument is that he is not portrayed exactly like it is in the comics which is something people kept bytching about Tobey in the first trilogy. The hate for him as Spider-Man is unwarranted IMO, he did a good job.
Why was Tobey so terrible exactly? I just don't see it. I did not like Dunst in the first trilogy, I'll give you that one.