Anybody that says they liked it is a Stan. What a life to live to forever hate Marvel bout to have these nikkas mad for ten damn years a got damn generation done grown up and these nikkas been mad the whole time
Marvel got them so damn mad
Anybody that says they liked it is a Stan. What a life to live to forever hate Marvel bout to have these nikkas mad for ten damn years a got damn generation done grown up and these nikkas been mad the whole time
Nobody is saying they are on the same level.I'm not minimizing it, "Age Of Ultron" was awful. But you cats are talking about cartoons and comics as the yard stick for a character's popularity when very little of that $1.4 billion was from comic fans.
I'm talking about average, every day people. Not comic fans.
I don't even know what you cats are arguing about. I'm saying fukking up Ronan isn't going to be as noticeable as fukking up an X-Men. And it's not. One is a A-list member of Marvel's most popular team, and one is a Z-tier villain for Guardians Of The Galaxy, who is itself a Z-tier team.
Imagine if I remixed DAS EFX "Dead Serious" with shytty beats vs if I remixed BIG's "Ready To Die". People are going to be far more upset at the latter than the former. Most people probably wouldn't even care about the former.
Fred.
Fox giving the rights to the X-Men back to Marvel/Disney would be a stupid decision. The movies make money and that is the only thing that matters to a movie studio.All business, Fox should just give the rights back overall, they are the faculty putting out a shytty product from start, fans should petition if they have a problem, Marvel wouldn't have had to sell if fans came thru in the clutch
movies like first class,x2 and dofp take a giant shyt on garbage like Thor 2 and iron man 2. Matter of fact they better than the majority of the MCU filmsAll business, Fox should just give the rights back overall, they are the faculty putting out a shytty product from start, fans should petition if they have a problem, Marvel wouldn't have had to sell if fans came thru in the clutch
Yeah I understand, I don't have to like it though . Fox knows their material is bad.Fox giving the rights to the X-Men back to Marvel/Disney would be a stupid decision. The movies make money and that is the only thing that matters to a movie studio.
movies like first class,x2 and dofp take a giant shyt on garbage like Thor 2 and iron man 2. Matter of fact they better than the majority of the MCU films
The majority of their films are well reviewed and well liked.Yeah I understand, I don't have to like it though . Fox knows their material is bad.
The X-franchise only really has two legit horrible movies though: Last Stand and the first Wolverine.Yeah I understand, I don't have to like it though . Fox knows their material is bad.
How about Mandarin
Red skull
Scarlet witch
Quicksilver
Crossbones
Baron Zemo
Theskrullschituri
Ronan
Roadey (did they even reference him in cap two after he got destroyed?)
The all powerful - wise cracking black widow and Hawkeye
Hank Pym :Mindbaugh:
Whoever the fukk Thor was battling in the abhorrent Thor 2
Uncle ben:scustbaugh:
It goes both ways breh don't act like they're infallible.
I'm not minimizing it, "Age Of Ultron" was awful. But you cats are talking about cartoons and comics as the yard stick for a character's popularity when very little of that $1.4 billion was from comic fans.
I'm talking about average, every day people. Not comic fans.
I don't even know what you cats are arguing about. I'm saying fukking up Ronan isn't going to be as noticeable as fukking up an X-Men. And it's not. One is a A-list member of Marvel's most popular team, and one is a Z-tier villain for Guardians Of The Galaxy, who is itself a Z-tier team.
Imagine if I remixed DAS EFX "Dead Serious" with shytty beats vs if I remixed BIG's "Ready To Die". People are going to be far more upset at the latter than the former. Most people probably wouldn't even care about the former.
Fred.
I'm more annoyed by how they completely fukked up Zemo.While I agree with the analogy I'd say where it doesn't hold up is that it's all relative as to what's important and what's not. You can't bytch about Logan taking liberties with the story but be okay with civil war or age of ultron taking liberties as well. If you want to argue about who's a more important character yeah you're right that people on the whole will be more upset about messing up storm than they will Zemo. But when the argument is that liberties shouldn't be taken but you're cool when they're taken by other people then that's hypocrisy
Are you implying that the Disney films are all perfect representations of their comic characters?
Because. They aren't. Not even fukking close.
While I agree with the analogy I'd say where it doesn't hold up is that it's all relative as to what's important and what's not. You can't bytch about Logan taking liberties with the story but be okay with civil war or age of ultron taking liberties as well. If you want to argue about who's a more important character yeah you're right that people on the whole will be more upset about messing up storm than they will Zemo. But when the argument is that liberties shouldn't be taken but you're cool when they're taken by other people then that's hypocrisy
I think most are sensibly aware enough to know that some liberties being taken on any film made from a previous medium is a given, regardless cuz a 1-1 translation of such is just very rare and in a lot of cases, simply can't be done for a variety of reasons. However, some are obviously a lot more glaring and unforgivable than others and also, said liberties are looked at just as such all the more when they're just executed terribly on a multitude of factors.