So you think Pyscloke was good representation of the character?
Apocalypse?
Juggernaut?
Angel
Havok.
Silver Samurai.
Storm.
Kitty Pryde.
Rogue.
Gambit.
John Wraith.
Darwin.
(Actor/characterization actually was good, but you see how they went with that).
White Queen.
Fox films, if your name ain't Wolverine, Xavier, Magneto or Mystique, most of, if not all characterization is b*stardized at best, if not totally forgotten or non-developed at worst. Storylines and plots were hit or miss too. That ain't no damn opinion breh.
"Gina that ain't no damn puppy!"
But shyt, at least they (X-men movies) had some hits, whereas the filth that is Fantastic Four...
Also, the whole argument about why's marvel doing such and such, seems to gloss over that it is Fox that isn't willing to sell the rights back at all or make a deal with mahvel that benefits them boy like Sony did. I get that they don't have to but, still,
they forced Disney/Marvel's hand to put more effort into their own stuff rather than try to spread the wealth with the properties they don't have movie rights over. I don't think it's self-sabotaging so much as the care that could've/would've went towards X-men is going towards their currently own properties, which just is at their (X-men/FF) expense.