So if a man kills another man

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

What is your definition of moral absolution then, god dammit.

What all people, everywhere, ought to do at all times.​

 

[Dooby]

What all people, everywhere, ought to do at all times.​

And that's subjective...

Every single person on this planet doesn't agree on one thing they ought or ought not do.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

And that's subjective...

Every single person on this planet doesn't agree on one thing they ought or ought not do.

Then why are your morals better than anyone else's?

I question what is right and wrong because that is very much subjective.
I have and have a firm grasp on my own personal views of what's right and wrong and I feel they're superior to most people's.

​

 

[Dooby]

Then why are your morals better than anyone else's?



​

are you so...

What point are you trying to make exactly? Because you're all over the place.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

are you so...

What point are you trying to make exactly? Because you're all over the place.

I'm focused. Answer the question.

​

 

[Dooby]

Then why are your morals better than anyone else's?



​

Because they're my fukking morals

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Because they're my fukking morals

So, using your 'fukking morals', when is it appropriate to rape a baby?​

 

[NoMayo15]

Because they're my fukking morals

And to add to that, it's his opinion that his morals are superior to any differing morals. Not some kind of absolute truth.

 

[Mowgli]

and let's say the man that was killed was a bum that has no family or friends. Why should that man be punished for killing that bum? The bum no longer exists and cannot experience anything. He had no friends or family so there aren't any grievances. There are no negative burdens held.

Punishing that person would only put a faith in perhaps a karma based system or afterlife but those haven't been proven.

Speak on it.

We dont reward mentally ill people. Please dont have children.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

And to add to that, it's his opinion that his morals are superior to any differing morals. Not some kind of absolute truth.

Would you care to answer the question I posed earlier, then?​

 

[NoMayo15]

Would you care to answer the question I posed earlier, then?​

Sure.

When is it appropriate to rape a baby?

It's appropriate to rape a baby when you want to have sex with a baby. I mean, it's not gonna just let you fukk it.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Sure.
It's appropriate to rape a baby when you want to have sex with a baby. I mean, it's not gonna just let you fukk it. Then again, I guess a baby isn't really gonna resist, is it.

Thank you.

Now, would you rape a baby? Should anyone be allowed to?

​

 

[NoMayo15]

Thank you.

Now, would you rape a baby?

​

Not sure. Probably not.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Not sure. Probably not.

Why not?​

 

[sm0ke]

Check out buddy, feeling himself off his daps. Just remember I'm a splendid one to behold while you're just a name known to all. Charles Manson is a name known to all. Just sayin