So if a man kills another man

[Meta Reign]

and let's say the man that was killed was a bum that has no family or friends. Why should that man be punished for killing that bum? The bum no longer exists and cannot experience anything. He had no friends or family so there aren't any grievances. There are no negative burdens held.

Punishing that person would only put a faith in perhaps a karma based system or afterlife but those haven't been proven.

Speak on it.

Because a person had no friends or family to grieve for them does not mean that it's okay to kill them you stupid fukk.

Did the bum want to be murdered? Did you ask the bum? This is the core argument for euthanasia. The person actually WANTS to have their life taken away from them. Unlike the bum in the ally.

So no, it's not based on any absolute as much as it's based simply on the other person wanting their life. As far as war goes, everyone participating knows they may die, so there goes that argument. They have the option of not participating.

Raping babies (can't believe I have to type this), is wrong simply because a baby can not effectively communicate that it does or does not want to be raped (unless you're smart enough to know that their cries of sheer horror means 'no!!!!'.

Now can we ban this fukk?

 

[Dooby]

That is correct.



Can't get to the point unless you stop avoiding answering the question. So I guess you're done.​

Alright. But who laid out those golden rules? And are you religious? Is this where all of this is going?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Alright. But who laid out those golden rules? And are you religious? Is this where all of this is going?

IDK, no & no.​

 

[Dooby]

Because a person had no friends or family to grieve for them does not mean that it's okay to kill them you stupid fukk.

Did the bum want to be murdered? Did you ask the bum? This is the core argument for euthanasia. The person actually WANTS to have their life taken away from them. Unlike the bum in the ally.

So no, it's not based on any absolute as much as it's based simply on the other person wanting their life. As far as war goes, everyone participating knows they may die, so there goes that argument. They have the option of not participating.

Raping babies (can't believe I have to type this), is wrong simply because a baby can not effectively communicate that it does or does not want to be raped (unless you're smart enough to know that their cries of sheer horror means 'no!!!!'.

Now can we ban this fukk?

It was just a question you oversensitive fakkit.

Higher learning, I went from green to red for just posing questions whether to question you or society's stance on things. I've been called all kinds of names and accused of many things for these questions.

I'm questioning now should I even remain to give you ignorant pieces of shyts any more time of my day...

fukk you, bytch.

 

[Brown_Pride]

It was just a question you oversensitive fakkit.

Higher learning, I went from green to red for just posing questions whether to question you or society's stance on things. I've been called all kinds of names and accused of many things for these questions.

I'm questioning now should I even remain to give you ignorant pieces of shyts any more time of my day...

fukk you, bytch.

come on son you were talking about fondling kids and killing bumbs.


you've gone off the farm and are trying to tie your weird ass moral compass/psychotic fantasies to some "i'm just asking questions" mumbo jumbo and no one is buying it...sorry.

fact of the matter is if you really believe killing a bum is ok because no one will miss him then...well as i said before the resident CIA MOLE needs to get off his ass and pay you a visit.

 

[concise]

and let's say the man that was killed was a bum that has no family or friends. Why should that man be punished for killing that bum? The bum no longer exists and cannot experience anything. He had no friends or family so there aren't any grievances. There are no negative burdens held.

Punishing that person would only put a faith in perhaps a karma based system or afterlife but those haven't been proven.

Speak on it.

This has been proven wrong throughout this thread, but I believe you have ignored it because it didn't lead into whatever point you wanted to make. Don't go storming off now. Come back with a better and less absurd scenario next time.

 

[NoMayo15]

Please clarify your position.

​

I don't know how to explain it any other way.

I have a point, but require you to answer the original question in order to make it.

Since you have not, I cannot.​

Well, get to your point. I've answered your series of questions for several posts now, and I still don't follow where you're going with this.

 

[NoMayo15]

What people do is subject to change. What people ought to do is not.

​

This is wrong. What people think they & others ought to do can change over time. And just because you can think of one example where that may never change (raping babies), doesn't change that.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

fact of the matter is if you really believe killing a bum is ok because no one will miss him then...well as i said before the resident CIA MOLE needs to get off his ass and pay you a visit.

@88m3

 

[88m3]

What about virgins approaching their mid-20's?

http://www.the-coli.com/locker-room/1099-23-going-24-still-virgin-please-help.html

Should there be no repercussions for killing these pathetic, useless, incompetent, genetic dead weight fukks too?

@88m3

I glossed over this post the first time around.

I frankly doubt I can damage this kid more than he already is.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I don't know how to explain it any other way.

Then I don't understand you because those two sentences completely contradict each other.

Well, get to your point. I've answered your series of questions for several posts now, and I still don't follow where you're going with this.

I don't know where you stand on the original question since you've given two different answers.​

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

Seriously how the fukk is this thread doing numbers??? stop feeding the troll

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

This is wrong. What people think they & others ought to do can change over time. And just because you can think of one example where that may never change (raping babies), doesn't change that.

What changes is not the moral value, but attitudes regarding whether a given action violates that value.

What's really of concern is that YOU TRIED TO DEFEND BABY RAPE.​