So am I the only one that felt Superman warranted his own trilogy?

Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
69,207
Reputation
11,433
Daps
241,956
Reppin
206 & 734
Supes should be treated like the Hulk in the MCU. Only bring him in when you have to. We don't need anymore solo movies with him fighting bank robbers and saving crashing planes while Lex plans some stupid scheme in the background :yeshrug:
Lmao. Superman being a background charctor. Check.
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,554
Reputation
2,415
Daps
34,713
Reppin
Philly
DC has no clue what to do with Superman or Wonder Woman. That's 2/3 of their trilogy. While we're at it, Dikk Grayson is highly disrespected by DC as well.

There's no reason why they have to introduce Wonder Woman in a Supes/Batman team-up, like she's Zatanna or Vixen or someone.
 

Neuromancer

Rouge AI
Supporter
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
79,678
Reputation
15,723
Daps
192,609
Reppin
A Villa Straylight.
DC has no clue what to do with Superman or Wonder Woman. That's 2/3 of their trilogy. While we're at it, Dikk Grayson is highly disrespected by DC as well.

There's no reason why they have to introduce Wonder Woman in a Supes/Batman team-up, like she's Zatanna or Vixen or someone.
They should've just made a trinity movie.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
184,213
Reputation
23,725
Daps
598,888
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
DC has no clue what to do with Superman or Wonder Woman. That's 2/3 of their trilogy. While we're at it, Dikk Grayson is highly disrespected by DC as well.

There's no reason why they have to introduce Wonder Woman in a Supes/Batman team-up, like she's Zatanna or Vixen or someone.

Of course there is a reason. They are showing the how and why Wonder Woman gets involved with the others. She has her own movie coming out as well which will focus on both her origins and the present day. Y'all don't think. :pachaha:
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
17,554
Reputation
2,415
Daps
34,713
Reppin
Philly
Of course there is a reason. They are showing the how and why Wonder Woman gets involved with the others. She has her own movie coming out as well which will focus on both her origins and the present day. Y'all don't think. :pachaha:

Wonder Woman is 70+ years old and an icon on her own. Her movie should have come out before the team-up. Batman and Supes have had 3 go-rounds as flms and yet no Wonder Woman? They've rarely pushed her. They could've at least given her a movie in the 80's, she could've had more than 1 animated solo. They're introducing her like she's secondary status. They've given her the Elektra treatment.
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
39,494
Reputation
1,543
Daps
37,674
Reppin
NULL
They weren't going to put Batman on the shelf for years to get a Man of Steel trilogy going. Then if you do a Justice League movie you have to explain why they didn't interact with one another until now because you know fans would have cried about that too.

Can't please everyone. :manny:

DC has no clue what to do with Superman or Wonder Woman. That's 2/3 of their trilogy. While we're at it, Dikk Grayson is highly disrespected by DC as well.

There's no reason why they have to introduce Wonder Woman in a Supes/Batman team-up, like she's Zatanna or Vixen or someone.

Of course there is a reason. They are showing the how and why Wonder Woman gets involved with the others. She has her own movie coming out as well which will focus on both her origins and the present day. Y'all don't think. :pachaha:
Wonder Woman is 70+ years old and an icon on her own. Her movie should have come out before the team-up. Batman and Supes have had 3 go-rounds as flms and yet no Wonder Woman? They've rarely pushed her. They could've at least given her a movie in the 80's, she could've had more than 1 animated solo. They're introducing her like she's secondary status. They've given her the Elektra treatment.


I agree with nieman. DC just keeps doing batman, and that's fine but, there's no variety. WW should have had her own movie years ago, she's an a level character unlike Black Widow. Captain Marvel (Shazam) and dikk Grayson, etc. Now the CW is doing a good job but the JC needs more individual exposure.
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,525
Reputation
8,694
Daps
202,715
Reppin
NULL
They're introducing her like she's secondary status. They've given her the Elektra treatment.
:dwillhuh:

giphy-3gif.gif

comiccon-ew-1371-1372-6cf89.jpg


We're really comparing her promotion to Elektra :beli:

She has the next solo movie. We're now complaining that she didn't get a movie 30 years ago, even though they're filming one to come out in 2017?
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
69,207
Reputation
11,433
Daps
241,956
Reppin
206 & 734
Wonder Woman is 70+ years old and an icon on her own. Her movie should have come out before the team-up. Batman and Supes have had 3 go-rounds as flms and yet no Wonder Woman? They've rarely pushed her. They could've at least given her a movie in the 80's, she could've had more than 1 animated solo. They're introducing her like she's secondary status. They've given her the Elektra treatment.
She is secondary status :yeshrug:

Batman and superman are tier zero
Wonder Woman is tier 1

Period
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,884
I mean, the Dawn of Justice idea is cool, but it would've been cool to have a Super only trilogy first.
Not if they don't plan on veering away from MoS which got more wrong than right


Ps who says we still don't get a trilogy?
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,884
The characterization of this one doesn't make me eager for one.
Did you mean the characterisation for the first doesn't make you eager for another? Same. Its like I wasn't really a fan of the 1st avenger like that but at least cap was recognisable and there was enough things there that could be built upon. And boy did they ever the next outing. With MoS I don't even know what they can do, there has been too much tinkering that the damage might be irreparable :scust:
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
11,695
Reputation
-70
Daps
29,219
Reppin
NYC
Did you mean the characterisation for the first doesn't make you eager for another? Same. Its like I wasn't really a fan of the 1st avenger like that but at least cap was recognisable and there was enough things there that could be built upon. And boy did they ever the next outing. With MoS I don't even know what they can do, there has been too much tinkering that the damage might be irreparable :scust:
cavill doesn't look like he's a plot device this time around. in that small bit of the BVS trailer he displayed more character than all of MOS. he looks really fukkin money as clark kent actually. hoping they nail it.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,884
cavill doesn't look like he's a plot device this time around. in that small bit of the BVS trailer he displayed more character than all of MOS. he looks really fukkin money as clark kent actually. hoping they nail it.
Me too but that's dawn of justice we talking man of steel 2 :sas2:
 

KravenMorehead™

Barrel Brothers.®
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Messages
33,273
Reputation
9,780
Daps
95,456
Reppin
NoVA
Did you mean the characterisation for the first doesn't make you eager for another? Same. Its like I wasn't really a fan of the 1st avenger like that but at least cap was recognisable and there was enough things there that could be built upon. And boy did they ever the next outing. With MoS I don't even know what they can do, there has been too much tinkering that the damage might be irreparable :scust:
Yup. But "this one" as in this iteration of the character. "for one" as in a trilogy. I'm willing to ride it out, but I think Snyder has a character trait where he gets off on doing something he KNOWS will piss enthusiasts off, and I think that's gonna play into everything else he does. He needs someone to rein him in, so to speak...
 
Top