So all Hitler had to do was not backstab stalin...and london west Europe is his

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,186
Reputation
2,299
Daps
34,980
Reppin
NULL
Hitler was legitimately insane. I picked up a copy of Mein Kampf at my college library and was like :picard: after the first twenty pages. Dude was craziest internet troll level crazy. Delusional, overly simplistic thinking, hysterical, etc. There was no way his story was going to end any other way than it did.

He almost committed suicide...
 

Sukairain

Shahenshah
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
4,770
Reputation
2,273
Daps
17,389
Reppin
Straiya
What made the decision worse was that he had signed a ten year non-aggression pact with Stalin in 1938. He had so much time to finish up in the west and north African fronts before turning east. Yeah it was an element of surprise to invading Russia after only three years, but still you should always lock down a frontier before expanding in a different direction. Fool should have played a few campaigns on Rome Total War and he would have realised that :wow:
 

MidniteJay

無敵
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
24,632
Reputation
5,749
Daps
65,599
Here's a better one, what if japan conquered the rest of Asia with no outside interference? What would history be like today?

With the demonic ass experiments and games Japan was running on the Chinese back then rest of Asia had to be :whew: IMO it probably wouldn't have been good for them at all if Japan didn't get humbled by them bombs. :picard:
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
22,902
Reputation
4,053
Daps
88,235
Reppin
The Diaspora

Family Man

Banned
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
13,175
Reputation
2,022
Daps
54,976
Context I would think could make that possible. I'm sure America didn't advertise its mistreatment of black to the rest of the world,and put themselves on a highhorse as being the moral superior to other nations. So I wouldn't be suprised a Nazi could come over and in context see how they treat him,a Nazi who tried to kill American soldiers better than they treated blacks. It would be one thing if they treated him worst as a Nazi and spat on him,and had him doing degrading shyt. But nope,just had the blacks do it,while not allowing them to eat with the whites who's backs they were watching in the war. Excuse me,the whites who's fronts they were protecting because I'm sure they were front line as shields.

Its similar to someone who is "hard on ho's" could even be taken aback if they come over your house and see you beating your wife for no reason:gucci:. They are basically saying "damn,thats even cold for me:mjlol:" not that they don't agree with it. But they probably also find it ironic based on how they are viewed as evil Nazis,when America was doing the same shyt to us.
Right. Also a lot of Hitler's and the Nazi's inspiration came from America's land grab westward and the slavery and massacre of the indigenous and African peoples. Hitler's whole shyt about "living space" for the Germans came directly from watching and studying the white Americans.
Hitler was delusional because he was saying that America can't say shyt about what he's doing because they (the Americans) did the same shyt successfully. His whole thing was that America has no moral high ground over him.

Which brings me to this question....what's the difference between Hitler and America' "founding fathers"? Hitler didn't see much of one.
 
Last edited:

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
19,659
Reputation
3,115
Daps
71,197
Best summary of ww2 history I have found for the European front is hardcore history with Dan Carlin. He is doing one now of the Pacific front of ww2 from the eyes of Japan.


He has a series on the Khans as well! Best history summary I have ever heard ever!

Carlin is excellent when it comes to the visual and the description of the battle or the personas behind the wheel. However, his stuff looks too much like a blockbuster. He doesn't really explain the political/ideological sides of things.
 

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
19,659
Reputation
3,115
Daps
71,197
What made the decision worse was that he had signed a ten year non-aggression pact with Stalin in 1938. He had so much time to finish up in the west and north African fronts before turning east. Yeah it was an element of surprise to invading Russia after only three years, but still you should always lock down a frontier before expanding in a different direction. Fool should have played a few campaigns on Rome Total War and he would have realised that :wow:

He had no chance. He knew that Stalin was reorganizing his military as well. Stalin was not waiting for him his hands crossed. Plus, he needed Ukraine for food and the Caucasus for oil. Also, putting the USSR to sleep was, in his mind, the guarantee that UK was going to negotiate and the war will end.
 
Top