Do y'all miss Phil yet?
No nikka. No. Same way we didn't miss Isiah when Phil was fukking up This punchline is tired as fukk.![]()
Besides Baker?Too many shots need to be made between Melo, KP, and Timmy. for all three to be effective. ..... of those 3 KP would be the one likely to fall back ..... Then Frank needs to get reps in there as well as Willy...... Plus the Knicks still don't got a PG besides Baker
Besides Baker?
I know you ain't talking about Baker the Shot Maker like that.![]()
I understand most of what you're saying.
The only thing is, I still don't see how this was the type of move people were afraid of.
I thought we were afraid of vets in their prime or at the end of it being signed as a way to give Melo a last hurrah into glory which would be contradictory to a rebuild.
I was more afraid of Rondo - regardless of whether he'd show Frank any tools of the trade.
----------------------------------------
Disclaimer - I'm a layman. I believe DFG% means how will your opponent's FG% was when you were guarding him. Please correct me if I'm wrong in my interpretations of terminology or improtant.
Looking at NBA.com, KCP's DFG% was 45.5 and THJR's was 40.7, overall.
And this is with KCP & THJR averaging a similar amount of shots attempted on them - 8.7 and 8.8, respectively.
----------------------------------------
I admit that I'm a "simple fan" who falls in love with my players - I'm not hiding from it.
I just believe the outrage is unwarranted.
------------------------------------------
This is true.
Why does Melo need to be traded for this move to make sense? I'm missing something. I feel like this is either you love it or you hate it. THJR is nowhere close to Melo in terms of offense or defense. It's a bad contract regardless of what the Knicks do.
I look at it like this:
We essentially gave THJR to ATL to develop him for two years away from the dysfunction of NY that would have stunted him.
We brought back a better version of a prospect we drafted.
He might actually be a part of our future... Maybe not. If he continues to trend positively and blossoms into a legit player, than it's a win.
If he regresses and doesn't, it's a win because it translates into lucrative draft position and locks up salary so we don't sign veteran stars for the sake of win now.
------------------------------
On the flip, I remember brehs talking about offering KCP a deal which would have been around 17m per year.
KCP is 24 years old.
---------------------------------
With respect to the contract, what is the long term negative consequences of a team in rebuild and knowing that playoffs/chip is out of the conversation for at least 4 years?
--------------------------------
Now, in asking these questions, I'll admit that I made arguments in favor of the Noah contract and I own up to that. I know things could be bad with every decision.
I'm not seeing how this acquisition is anywhere near that considering Noah/Rose were win now and this is seems to be about securing a long term young piece, who, short term, isn't good enough to make us a treadmill team, but long term, could be part of a young nucleus.
Too many shots need to be made between Melo, KP, and Timmy. for all three to be effective. ..... of those 3 KP would be the one likely to fall back ..... Then Frank needs to get reps in there as well as Willy...... Plus the Knicks still don't got a PG besides Baker
Because it's time to move the fukk on.Why does Melo need to be traded for this move to make sense? I'm missing something. I feel like this is either you love it or you hate it. THJR is nowhere close to Melo in terms of offense or defense. It's a bad contract regardless of what the Knicks do.