Your dad should have skeeted in your mum's mouth, you walking advert for contraceptives.
Form a coherent argument, you dunce.
Again, are you retarded? She did not get caught doping. The term refers to the use of performance enhancing drugs in competition. The article you cited confirms that the drug is not performance enhancing nor is it used as a masking agent.
Moreover, this is not something I need to defend. She didn't follow the list and received a 6 month suspension as a result. The onus is not on me to move from the position because you're too much of a retard to read and understand the articles you have posted.
Conjecture, she got suspended by the IAAF, with testing done under the
WORLD ANTI-DOPING AGENCY, testing positive for a banned substance. Which in this case was a banned narcotic. She got caught doping.
Again, if you didn’t have the critical thinking skills of a small child. You would see that the context of me responding to the biased Jamaican poster demonizing Shacarri. Not only her valid criticism of fellow athletes patronizing her. But also the fact that she was banned from the Olympics due to a similar infraction of the Jamaican sprinters he was comparing her to.
Somehow Shacarri is “dumb”, “dense”, and a “hoe” among other insults where the same criticisms would not be held to the Jamaican sprinters in similar context.
But instead, like a scorned menopausal woman you conveniently ignored the context behind that post. AND chose to derail the thread to focus on semantics rather than the underlying bias that warranted such a contextual response from the biased Jamaican poster.
Again, kill yourself.
Ain't nothing ratchet about speaking up for yourself.
