Sean "Diddy" Combs Arrested in NYC by the Feds

Reality Check

Keepin' it 100
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,656
Reputation
1,765
Daps
47,694
That is because Dr Dre and Eminem are caught up in them tapes themselves. 50 doesn't want the guilt of throwing away his massas freedoms because of his hatred of Puff.

As hilarious as it would be for Dre to be involved with male escorts given what Suge Knight has said for years, I doubt he's on those tapes.

Nap back in The Bushes!
:blessed:

It's crazy that in the year 2024, people haven't put him on ignore by now.
 
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
18,518
Reputation
1,227
Daps
38,342
What are the chances y’all think that the Diddy tapes will leak?

I know there’s people on them recordings that are scared to death right now. Illuminati rituals, demonic activities….Thats why I can see Diddy getting epstein’d. Not only her knows secrets but he has videos of all that shyt.

Quite possible as the people on them maybe hip hop artists, black athletes, and black actors! They won't mind them being exposed but if it was high level politicians they won't this is the difference with Epstein and Diddy.

Videos that have been recorded from hidden cameras in rooms won't be shown as that is something the people in the rooms had no idea they were being recorded! That is some scumbag shyt.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,974
Reputation
6,046
Daps
62,728
Reppin
San Diego
This whole thing about stars or celebs or public figures being on tapes is ludicrous. Total social media hysteria. If that's what you expect from this case, you will be disappointed.

The people on tapes is Puff, Cassie, male escirts, female escorts/females that were involved with Puff

it's not a case about celeb blackmail. it's about a powerful person abusing people beneath him.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
177,340
Reputation
22,329
Daps
581,515
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
This whole thing about stars or celebs or public figures being on tapes is ludicrous. Total social media hysteria. If that's what you expect from this case, you will be disappointed.

The people on tapes is Puff, Cassie, male escirts, female escorts/females that were involved with Puff

it's not a case about celeb blackmail. it's about a powerful person abusing people beneath him.

I don't expect a bunch of celebs to be on tapes but you never know. We know that some of these people partied with Diddy a lot so there's no telling how deep it went. :dame:

But also... why do you think a bunch of celebs are deleting their social media posts? It's related to Diddy in some way
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,974
Reputation
6,046
Daps
62,728
Reppin
San Diego
I don't expect a bunch of celebs to be on tapes but you never know. We know that some of these people partied with Diddy a lot so there's no telling how deep it went. :dame:

But also... why do you think a bunch of celebs are deleting their social media posts? It's related to Diddy in some way

That's just textbook PR and framing their narrative as not wanting to acknowledge Puff at all. It's bad to even be associated. That is coming straight from their heads of marketing and agents. Esp. with online culture and 'fan' culture, digging up videos and tweets to keep the content flowing from all those sites that post it. William Morris and CAA are just guarding their investments

Not saying that no one did anything with Puff, I am sure they did. But, the "freak offs" were a private thing, it's all in the wording of the lawsuit and the criminal charges. Even the Lil Rod lawsuit, which is questionable, moreso than others, there was no "freak off" he was just at parties where people like Cuba Gooding were acting wild.

and all the people I have been to a party with, or associated with, I am NOT responsible for whatever they did in another room, or when I was wasn't there.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
177,340
Reputation
22,329
Daps
581,515
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
That's just textbook PR and framing their narrative as not wanting to acknowledge Puff at all. It's bad to even be associated. That is coming straight from their heads of marketing and agents. Esp. with online culture and 'fan' culture, digging up videos and tweets to keep the content flowing from all those sites that post it. William Morris and CAA are just guarding their investments

Not saying that no one did anything with Puff, I am sure they did. But, the "freak offs" were a private thing, it's all in the wording of the lawsuit and the criminal charges. Even the Lil Rod lawsuit, which is questionable, moreso than others, there was no "freak off" he was just at parties where people like Cuba Gooding were acting wild.

and all the people I have been to a party with, or associated with, I am NOT responsible for whatever they did in another room, or when I was wasn't there.

I agree that it's PR but why scrub their entire shyt? Also, I feel like their teams are failing them. When you scrub your whole shyt like that, it makes you look guilty of something and that in my view will lead to more digging from internet detectives.

Also, I hear you that most of the people in the 'freak offs' were probably prostitutes, but we know Cassie was involved. If Cassie was coerced into this shyt, then so could Yung Miami or Lori Harvey etc... or they could have been willing participants.
 

steadyrighteous

Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
17,118
Reputation
6,364
Daps
102,500
That's just textbook PR and framing their narrative as not wanting to acknowledge Puff at all. It's bad to even be associated. That is coming straight from their heads of marketing and agents. Esp. with online culture and 'fan' culture. William Morris and CAA are just guarding their investments

Not saying that no one did anything with Puff, I am sure they did. But, the "freak offs" were a private thing, it's all in the wording of the lawsuit and the criminal charges. Even the Lil Rod lawsuit, which is questionable, moreso than others, there was no "freak off" he was just at parties where people like Cuba Gooding were acting wild.

and all the people I have been to a party with, or associated with, I am NOT responsible for whatever they did in another room, or when I was wasn't there.

You're gonna have a tough time convincing nyggas of this, even though basic reading comprehension and listening to the press conference pretty much lays this out.

These freak offs were not celebrity-filled orgies with your favs all in attendance.

But that won't satisfy our culture's thirst for gossip.

Even when the US Attorney was talking about blackmailing and having videos, he was very specifically talking about using tapes of the freak offs as leverage to keep women who participated in check, and making sure they kept participating.

But people heard "videos" and "blackmail" and decided that those videos were being used to blackmail celebrities and executives or some shyt.

At best, it's a sign of poor comprehension culturally, at worst it's just ignorance and maliciousness.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
177,340
Reputation
22,329
Daps
581,515
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Even when the US Attorney was talking about blackmailing and having videos, he was very specifically talking about using tapes of the freak offs as leverage to keep women who participated in check, and making sure they kept participating.

But people heard "videos" and "blackmail" and decided that those videos were being used to blackmail celebrities and executives or some shyt.

What you left out.... is that the DA also said that women were promised "fame" or opportunities to get them at these parties and then coerced and forced to keep participating.

That implies that not everyone involved was a prostitute. You just ruined your whole argument by leaving that part out.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,974
Reputation
6,046
Daps
62,728
Reppin
San Diego
You're gonna have a tough time convincing nyggas of this, even though basic reading comprehension and listening to the press conference pretty much lays this out.

These freak offs were not celebrity-filled orgies with your favs all in attendance.

But that won't satisfy our culture's thirst for gossip.

Even when the US Attorney was talking about blackmailing and having videos, he was very specifically talking about using tapes of the freak offs as leverage to keep women who participated in check, and making sure they kept participating.

But people heard "videos" and "blackmail" and decided that those videos were being used to blackmail celebrities and executives or some shyt.

At best, it's a sign of poor comprehension culturally, at worst it's just ignorance and maliciousness.

right. Of course not all the women were escorts.....that's where a lot of the sex trafficking comes in. They came for a private party, and left with a different experience. Like the GirlsDoPorn case. Very similar in some instances probably. Similar to Weinstin actually, as in they came to to talk work, or maybe a flirtation with a powerful man, maybe to even fukk him if they were feeling it. That's how a lot of parties are. The girls know whats up, but that's not the same as consenting to sex, or consennting to sex with one person, and another comes in the room. and this is when everyone is super high at 4:00 AM.

You get to a hotel suite, and it starts off like a party, lots of drugs, maybe Puff and one guy, and then it's Puff with a gun, all sweating and coked up, saying fukk this dude for 5k, or go down on me while Cassie watches, maybe it starts off with one sex act, and Cassie too, and so you do it, and the he films you, and says come back again. and he's got the videos. and that's after ketamine, coke, molly, alcohol.

This goes down all the time without the videos, and the three day freak offs. This is what partying looks like behind the scenes. it's all drugs and exploitation. Some people are willing and some go way too far. it's ugly. The Weeknd has a whole song about it on Echoes of Silence. If you've been around you know this exact scene.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
18,518
Reputation
1,227
Daps
38,342
I know if he's found guilty they could go after all the assets and money from his ventures that played a part in the criminal acts but if he put the money into his mother's account and/or kids can they go after that also?
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
19,974
Reputation
6,046
Daps
62,728
Reppin
San Diego
I know if he's found guilty they could go after all the assets and money from his ventures that played a part in the criminal acts but if he put the money into his mother's account and/or kids can they go after that also?

They are going to come up with a number and ask for forfeiture. They can't seize everything, but they will try and hit him for like 50 M's. I think in the Epstein case they wanted the Manhattan brownstone. and the rest of his assets were chewed up in civil suits with a receiver or however that works. They will track that money down all over the world.

That is the shakiest part of the case. Because clearly the ENTERPRISE was not for profit, like fraud or drugs or whatever. but they will come up with a number and hit him for it, for restitution to the victims.
 
Top