he's a wealthy black man with accusations of impropriety with women and a whole mess of influence on what is seen as black culture by non-black people.
They will throw the book at this man on principle and justify it on some morality policing shyt despite the litany of white folk with less money, and more money, who do the same shyt and get away with it. Dana White beat his wife and didn't nobody give a shyt whatsoever.
Thinking that they aren't going to make an example out of him and attempt to justify it's severity after the fact is an irrational belief to hold. they are going to come after that man looking to bury him, and anyone who gets too loud about his defense will be either painted with the same brush, or shamed for defending someone who, by all accounts,
is pretty indefensible.
he's on an island right now.
the stuff alluding to Pac AND Big with his name mixed up in there is just going to make him radioactive to what few pockets of support in the community he might have actually gotten.
he didn't want to be seen like Russell Simmons for fleeing the country with his money,
so now he gon be in the country, without his money, in jail
and the fact that Russell is the example here that will mostly be used just proves the difference. Because Roman Polansky was outchea raping, moved out the country and
continued to work. Mans had celebrities flying out of America just to keep working with him. And that was all collectively handwaved and ignored to the point where most people don't even reference it anymore.
complexion for protection, etc.
that said...
fukk The Diddler - good riddance to bad rubbish