Scientists calculate that the Earth may be the only planet in the entire galaxy capable of supporting advanced life

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
Some people just off the top of their dome assume, "There must be other civilizations out there." But these scientists are saying that there's a real possibility the Earth is so unique that we're the only advanced civilization in the whole thing.





The researchers argue that the presence of large oceans, plus Earth’s shift from single-lid tectonics (a stable surface layer) to modern plate tectonics about 1 billion years ago, were critical to the rapid development of complex life. This geological activity not only created the initial conditions necessary for life to emerge but also led to diverse environments with varying climates and ecosystems, which promoted the evolution of advanced life forms capable of developing technology and complex societies.

According to the new study, plate tectonics are crucial for developing complex life and advanced civilizations. Earth’s plate movements create diverse habitats, recycle nutrients, and regulate climate—all vital for life. It’s important for plate tectonics to last for 500 million years, Gerya explained, because biological evolution of complex multicellular life is extremely slow. “On Earth, it took more than 500 million years to develop humans from the first animals, which appeared around 800 million years ago,” he said.

Technology develops from everyday needs, such as making tools, farming, creating clothing, and making weapons, the authors argue, adding that fire and electricity are “essential” for the development of intelligent civilizations. Complex civilizations, they write, are unlikely to emerge in strictly ocean-based environments.

According to Stern and Gerya, it’s likely quite rare for planets to have both continents and oceans along with long-term plate tectonics, and this possibility needs to be factored into the Drake Equation.

Plugging in the numbers

To figure out how likely it is for a planet to have both continents and oceans, Stern and Gerya looked at how much water is needed on the planet’s surface. They found that an Earth-size planet needs to have between 0.007% and 0.027% of its mass in water for both continents and oceans to exist. Stern and Gerya then compared this to the overall possible range of water that planets can have, which is between 0% and 3.8% or even between 0% and 55%, depending on how they formed. For plate tectonics, the scientists used data showing that only about 33% of planets have the right chemicals to form sufficiently dense tectonic plates needed for plate tectonics. Of those, only about half are big enough and have enough gravity to support plate tectonics.

By including these new factors and estimates, the researchers estimate that the chance of a planet having both continents and oceans and long-term plate tectonics is very small—less than 0.2%. To put that into perspective, it’s like finding just two suitable planets out of every 1,000.

Plugging this value into the Drake Equation produces a rather discouraging result, at least as far as the presence of advanced aliens is concerned. The modified Drake Equation suggests that advanced civilizations are extremely rare, with the chance of planets having the right conditions being between 0.0034% and 0.17%. This means there could be anywhere from as few as 0.006 to as many as 100,000 active, communicative civilizations in our galaxy, with the actual number likely being on the lower end, considering the limited time these civilizations might communicate due to potential societal collapse or extinction.

“On the other hand, the chances of finding planets potentially suitable for civilizations—yet without any civilizations or with already extinct civilizations—are notably higher,” Gerya explained. “This could be done by remote sensing of exoplanets.”

Gerya explained that, while the upper bound value of 100,000 seems large, it’s the low number that’s more important. Because the low estimate is really close to zero, it means there’s a good chance there might not be any other civilizations in our galaxy. This would help explain why we haven’t detected any signals from other civilizations yet.

In the past, the Drake Equation gave a much higher low-end estimate, suggesting that it was almost certain we weren’t alone and that there should be at least 200 civilizations trying to communicate with us. Since we haven’t found any, this old estimate seems wrong, Gerya said. The new, much lower estimate (close to zero) makes it more understandable why we haven’t heard from anyone else: There might simply be no one else out there to hear from—a rather spooky possibility.







The closest galaxy to us is 2,500,000 light years away. So if we really are the only ones in this galaxy, and the nearest advanced life could only come from another galaxy, it would take them AT LEAST 2.5 million years to reach us traveling one-way at the highest possible speed. And that doesn't account for the fact that it's theoretically impossible for anyone to travel that fast, or the fact that in reality they'd spend millions of years exploring and/or settling in every other planet and system along the way and likely would never even come close to reaching us.

We really might be completely alone and never get another visitor for however long our civilization lasts. :ohhh:
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,478
Reputation
196
Daps
17,625
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Some people just off the top of their dome assume, "There must be other civilizations out there." But these scientists are saying that there's a real possibility the Earth is so unique that we're the only advanced civilization in the whole thing.





The researchers argue that the presence of large oceans, plus Earth’s shift from single-lid tectonics (a stable surface layer) to modern plate tectonics about 1 billion years ago, were critical to the rapid development of complex life. This geological activity not only created the initial conditions necessary for life to emerge but also led to diverse environments with varying climates and ecosystems, which promoted the evolution of advanced life forms capable of developing technology and complex societies.

According to the new study, plate tectonics are crucial for developing complex life and advanced civilizations. Earth’s plate movements create diverse habitats, recycle nutrients, and regulate climate—all vital for life. It’s important for plate tectonics to last for 500 million years, Gerya explained, because biological evolution of complex multicellular life is extremely slow. “On Earth, it took more than 500 million years to develop humans from the first animals, which appeared around 800 million years ago,” he said.

Technology develops from everyday needs, such as making tools, farming, creating clothing, and making weapons, the authors argue, adding that fire and electricity are “essential” for the development of intelligent civilizations. Complex civilizations, they write, are unlikely to emerge in strictly ocean-based environments.

According to Stern and Gerya, it’s likely quite rare for planets to have both continents and oceans along with long-term plate tectonics, and this possibility needs to be factored into the Drake Equation.


Plugging in the numbers

To figure out how likely it is for a planet to have both continents and oceans, Stern and Gerya looked at how much water is needed on the planet’s surface. They found that an Earth-size planet needs to have between 0.007% and 0.027% of its mass in water for both continents and oceans to exist. Stern and Gerya then compared this to the overall possible range of water that planets can have, which is between 0% and 3.8% or even between 0% and 55%, depending on how they formed. For plate tectonics, the scientists used data showing that only about 33% of planets have the right chemicals to form sufficiently dense tectonic plates needed for plate tectonics. Of those, only about half are big enough and have enough gravity to support plate tectonics.

By including these new factors and estimates, the researchers estimate that the chance of a planet having both continents and oceans and long-term plate tectonics is very small—less than 0.2%. To put that into perspective, it’s like finding just two suitable planets out of every 1,000.

Plugging this value into the Drake Equation produces a rather discouraging result, at least as far as the presence of advanced aliens is concerned. The modified Drake Equation suggests that advanced civilizations are extremely rare, with the chance of planets having the right conditions being between 0.0034% and 0.17%. This means there could be anywhere from as few as 0.006 to as many as 100,000 active, communicative civilizations in our galaxy, with the actual number likely being on the lower end, considering the limited time these civilizations might communicate due to potential societal collapse or extinction.

“On the other hand, the chances of finding planets potentially suitable for civilizations—yet without any civilizations or with already extinct civilizations—are notably higher,” Gerya explained. “This could be done by remote sensing of exoplanets.”

Gerya explained that, while the upper bound value of 100,000 seems large, it’s the low number that’s more important. Because the low estimate is really close to zero, it means there’s a good chance there might not be any other civilizations in our galaxy. This would help explain why we haven’t detected any signals from other civilizations yet.

In the past, the Drake Equation gave a much higher low-end estimate, suggesting that it was almost certain we weren’t alone and that there should be at least 200 civilizations trying to communicate with us. Since we haven’t found any, this old estimate seems wrong, Gerya said. The new, much lower estimate (close to zero) makes it more understandable why we haven’t heard from anyone else: There might simply be no one else out there to hear from—a rather spooky possibility.







The closest galaxy to us is 2,500,000 light years away. So if we really are the only ones in this galaxy, and the nearest advanced life could only come from another galaxy, it would take them AT LEAST 2.5 million years to reach us traveling one-way at the highest possible speed. And that doesn't account for the fact that it's theoretically impossible for anyone to travel that fast, or the fact that in reality they'd spend millions of years exploring and/or settling in every other planet and system along the way and likely would never even come close to reaching us.

We really might be completely alone and never get another visitor for however long our civilization lasts. :ohhh:
We’ve already had visitors though
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
We’ve already had visitors though


I would say that that's extremely unlikely, and this is something that I've been interested in and seriously researched for a long time.

I have yet to see any evidence that would make me think it is "likely" that we have ever had an extraterrestrial visitor to this planet.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,032
Reputation
15,922
Daps
266,243
Reppin
Oakland
Ok, there’s still hundreds of billions of galaxies…and scientists also put earth-like parameters on what could support life, I get it, as by not doing so you’re not helping to narrow the search, but yea, I’ll roll with the possibility there is more intelligent life in the universe, if not our own galaxy
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,035
Reputation
3,770
Daps
105,165
Reppin
Detroit
Ok, there’s still hundreds of billions of galaxies…and scientists also put earth-like parameters on what could support life, I get it, as by not doing so you’re not helping to narrow the search, but yea, I’ll roll with the possibility there is more intelligent life in the universe, if not our own galaxy

Sure, the universe is so big (in fact it might be infinitely big) that life is almost guaranteed to be somewhere else.

But if it's so extremely rare that most galaxies have 1 or fewer advanced civilizations, then we'll probably never actually find any aliens due to the distance. Sucks, but if that's how the universe is, that's how it is.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,032
Reputation
15,922
Daps
266,243
Reppin
Oakland
Sure, the universe is so big (in fact it might be infinitely big) that life is almost guaranteed to be somewhere else.

But if it's so extremely rare that most galaxies have 1 or fewer advanced civilizations, then we'll probably never actually find any aliens due to the distance. Sucks, but if that's how the universe is, that's how it is.
Don’t think we were ever going to find them even within our galaxy, I don’t think our civilization will be around long enough to get to that technological point
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,845
Reppin
the ether
In OUR immediate galaxy... But there are hundreds of uncharted stars and planets which we haven't scratched the surface...:comeon: and they know it
Ok, there’s still hundreds of billions of galaxies…and scientists also put earth-like parameters on what could support life, I get it, as by not doing so you’re not helping to narrow the search, but yea, I’ll roll with the possibility there is more intelligent life in the universe, if not our own galaxy
I’m willing to believe that within our own galaxy but there are almost an infinite number of galaxies out there. ‘Advanced’ life is probably fairly rare but I don’t think life in general is.



The issue is that all those other galaxies are completely irrelevant to us. Over 90% of them are literally BILLIONS of light years away. No one is going to travel for BILLIONS of years towards a random galaxy just hoping that they hit the one star out of trillions that holds life....and even if they did, they likely wouldn't reach us until long after our civilization died out. Just the time it would take to explore other, closer galaxies and stars would take tens of billions years more, longer than the life of the universe.


The very closest galaxies are Andromeda and Triangulum, each about 2,500,000 light years away. So even if they could invent light-speed travel (itself likely impossible), they would need longer to reach us than the entire history of the human species And why wouldn't they visit the one trillion stars in their own galaxy first? How long would it take to explore a trillion stars? Once again, almost certainly longer than the life of the universe.

After Andromeda/Triangulum, there are a handful of galaxies 4-6 million light years away. Then you have to go over 10 million light years away to hit the next major galaxy.


It is almost certainly impossible that any civilization a galaxy, no matter how advanced, will ever explore outside of their own galaxy even if the civilization survives for billions of years. The issue is that the distances are just too great and the # of stars to explore before you leave your own galaxy are far too many.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,032
Reputation
15,922
Daps
266,243
Reppin
Oakland
The issue is that all those other galaxies are completely irrelevant to us. Over 90% of them are literally BILLIONS of light years away. No one is going to travel for BILLIONS of years towards a random galaxy just hoping that they hit the one star out of trillions that holds life....and even if they did, they likely wouldn't reach us until long after our civilization died out. Just the time it would take to explore other, closer galaxies and stars would take tens of billions years more, longer than the life of the universe.


The very closest galaxies are Andromeda and Triangulum, each about 2,500,000 light years away. So even if they could invent light-speed travel (itself likely impossible), they would need longer to reach us than the entire history of the human species And why wouldn't they visit the one trillion stars in their own galaxy first? How long would it take to explore a trillion stars? Once again, almost certainly longer than the life of the universe.

After Andromeda/Triangulum, there are a handful of galaxies 4-6 million light years away. Then you have to go over 10 million light years away to hit the next major galaxy.


It is almost certainly impossible that any civilization a galaxy, no matter how advanced, will ever explore outside of their own galaxy even if the civilization survives for billions of years. The issue is that the distances are just too great and the # of stars to explore before you leave your own galaxy are far too many.
Most of us know this, these replies are moreso to your opening dismissing folks for saying there must be something else out there. We all know the improbability of at least us, ever both finding and traveling to those other planets
 
Top