disappointed how thirsty this thread is in the recent pages
I agree with Chomsky on some things but this ain't it.
disappointed how thirsty this thread is in the recent pages
Are you for real? It doesn’t take 30 years to take one country.it's a 30 year plan at this point depending on who you ask, but ignoring the historical context of that region of the world it's hard to overcome corruption and implement the necessary reforms to actually get in when your country is getting flooded with weapons and being used as a geopolitical pawn
laid out in post 862Are you for real? It doesn’t take 30 years to take one country.
Like we all understand the underlining racism involved in why Europe and America walk all over Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East in foreign policy.
But let’s be real here. If NATO were the big bad boogeyman wouldn’t they have just used the excuse of Georgia, Crimea, and now Ukraine to just take Russia? Instead of make gas deals and economic ties that keep Putin and friends in power?
What’s the actual plan from NATO for aggression?
Wrong.
That could have been done 30 years ago. The region was destabilized after the fall. Your post makes zero sense in the context of Russia.laid out in post 862
how would you have justified expanding the anti-USSR pact right after their empire collapsed?That could have been done 30 years ago. The region was destabilized after the fall. Your post makes zero sense in the context of Russia.
seems like a pretty good way to destabilize a region by not offering any economic future. as well as helping eventually sell the western corporations that take over industry as a good thing, as they're not run by corrupt oligarchs, ya know? things don't happen over night. You're not selling IMF loans and Western corporate hegemony to people raised and educated in Soviet Russia. Do you see how silly that is?America and Europe went in militarily without hesitation in those countries. They are literally propping up Putin and the oligarchs.
how would you have justified expanding the anti-USSR pact right after their empire collapsed?
seems like a pretty good way to destabilize a region by not offering any economic future. as well as helping eventually sell the western corporations that take over industry as a good thing, as they're not run by corrupt oligarchs, ya know? things don't happen over night. You're not selling IMF loans and Western corporate hegemony to people raised and educated in Soviet Russia. Do you see how silly that is?
Keepi know the longterm memory centers in your brain are fried by your internet addiction, but pushing for NATO expansion in Ukraine has been happening for decades. An outgoing George W Bush committed to Ukraine joining NATO in 2008. Keep carrying his foreign policy water
Act like you got some fukking nuts my dude.This video is dogshyt. Ridiculously bad faith arguing and motivated reasoning. Vaush is following the Hitchens leftist-to-Neocon pipeline.
alright we're done here. Have a great dayThe USSR destablized on its own. American and Europe didn’t destabilize it.
disappointed how thirsty this thread is in the recent pages
Peace.alright we're done here. Have a great day