quantify stuff in general, and not just you lol. i have to do the same as wellQuantify what? The posts I was complaining about were "Ra Ra America!" and bringing up the fukking War of 1812. There was nothing there that needed to be 'quantified' for any practical or useful reason, it was a blatant attempt to treat sides in a war like sports rooting interests and stan (or disparage) countries as an idea rather than the actual country we happen to be living in right now. Who won the War of 1812 or World War I is not a strong argument point in debating the quality of the American experience right now in 2022. Same goes for try to nail down "stats" like whether or not Afghanistan was a loss so we can put it in the right place in America's W-L record. In the context of the conversation, the only point seemed to be getting brag about how few "L's" the American military had taken compared to the Russia military. Which beyond being a waste of time, I find pretty repulsive considering the impact that virtually every one of these engagements in discussion has on the people involved.
Posts like this are fascinating cause they really put the insecurities on full blast. I made a short comment complaining that I don't like how flippiantly we're treating war, and you pivot to....intellect? WTF would intelligence have to do with my post?
and come on you can tell at a passing glance who's serious about what in most of these posts. war in its totality is repulsive. there's plenty of stuff many individuals posting or even casually reading will avoid. at the same time, the larger objectives will decide when and how all this ends so there will naturally be more emphasis on that. some points aren't communicated as well as they could be simply because what some consider to be critical will not be to others.
big example would be the afghanistan discussion point. the fact that in spite of two decades of turmoil and bloodshed, the US literally turned expeditionary/invasive campaigns into a fukking business model - and that's a level so far beyond any other nation's warfighting capability that it should be highlighted as absurd. that's obviously not going to line up with everyone's metric of 'success', so yeah - it could be quantified better as to not offend, be dismissive, downplay, distract, etc.
im not even disagreeing with you man. but the discourse on combat will never be pleasant in any form it takes. i think everyone, not just here either, could discuss these things better.