Whatever is off the books are not deployed in europe. Russia also has planes off the books. Russia is the only country which can see us technology for technology.What you're not understanding is that the B2 is technology from the mid 1970s. It was kept secret for damn near 15 years. Off the books.
What's off the books now?
Russia has the best tank on the market, so here why I know you have no idea what you're talking about. better do your research.on some real brawl russia would get it's ass kicked. it happened once on some cold sh1t and can happen again however they want.
submarines are played out.
those tanks russia sending to ukraine look
Whatever is off the books are not deployed in europe. Russia also has planes off the books. Russia is the only country which can see us technology for technology.
Here's the thing. The U.S spends tons of money, but the money mostly goes to maintenance because we're an offensive country. Those bases cost money to keep, every time an F-22 flys, it takes 2 million to clean and prep it again. Russia is NOT an offensive military, it is a defensive one. Meaning they spend less, but in the areas that they are powerful in, is to counter any technological advancement the U.S has. The U.S being offensive means it needs to COME to Russia....Russia is fully prepared for it. Every time a new aircraft carrier is built, Russia creates a cheap effective missiles that can annihilate it. Every time we make a plane, Russia creates radar that can detect it. Now which is cheaper, a plane or radar? aircraft carrier or missile? which one can destroy which one? now do you see how the chess game works? you can say "well the U.S can do the same" wrong, because Russia is not offensive, it will not invade Europe, it can't...it doesnt have the means, however NATO is an offensive military, so it will need/want to come to Russia. that is where they lose.[DOUBLEPOST=1397666764][/DOUBLEPOST]
Russia has the best tank on the market, so here why I know you have no idea what you're talking about. better do your research.
and Russia lost the cold war, which was not a war.
what proof do you have they have the best tanksRussia has the best tank on the market, so here why I know you have no idea what you're talking about. better do your research.
and Russia lost the cold war, which was not a war.
China buys its tech from RussiaThats China...
see link. Germany does have the leopard, but for whatever reason they lost against Russia during the sim games. [DOUBLEPOST=1397667214][/DOUBLEPOST]Their was also a show to sell tanks to the UEA. Russia yet again stole the show. Germany being surprised. The Russians have a knack for putting out false information about their technology. They'll put basic specs, but the tank and planes are actually superior than the specs they put out, whereas america tends to put accurate information because they sell the most tech to the world.what proof do you have they have the best tanks
from what i saw in the iraq-kuwait war they said germans had the best tanks. they sent some pretty sophisticated tanks. some drone-type tanks.
China buys its tech from Russia
I know I know you fools don't know what you're talking about.
IM GOING TO SAY THIS ONE LAST TIME. SPENDING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MILITARY MIGHT.Then whys Chinas military spending higher than Russia's? Whys China always said to be the next world power and not Russia?
IM GOING TO SAY THIS ONE LAST TIME. SPENDING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MILITARY MIGHT.
China spends more because they buy more. and they have a million man army they have to feed. Means nothing. China doesnt even have a 5th gen plane on the market and Russia does.
EVERYTHING china has on the market is either stolen, or bought from Russia, or bought and then recreated. Don't believe me, check out their missiles and planes. Even their rifles are copies.
The aircraft carrier they have is an old Russian one that they rebuilt. literally.
Chinese Show Off New Aircraft Carrier For U.S. Defense Secretary; Concerns Continue Over New Missiles and Submarines | Ottawa Citizen
The Liaoningis a refurbished Soviet warship with a conventional (not nuclear) power plant and a tilted deck that severely limits the range and payload of its aircraft. I
i live near a car plant and during war it was changed up to build military sh1t. i can trust germans got that work cause of the quality of their cars. and germans top the world's best engineers. and expatriate a lot of their engineers to the US.see link. Germany does have the leopard, but for whatever reason they lost against Russia during the sim games.
chinese are bums and they go on record many times saying they can't innovate sh1t.i see them cryin on pbs all the time.IM GOING TO SAY THIS ONE LAST TIME. SPENDING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MILITARY MIGHT.
China spends more because they buy more. and they have a million man army they have to feed. Means nothing. China doesnt even have a 5th gen plane on the market and Russia does.
EVERYTHING china has on the market is either stolen, or bought from Russia, or bought and then recreated. Don't believe me, check out their missiles and planes. Even their rifles are copies.
The aircraft carrier they have is an old Russian one that they rebuilt. literally.
Chinese Show Off New Aircraft Carrier For U.S. Defense Secretary; Concerns Continue Over New Missiles and Submarines | Ottawa Citizen[DOUBLEPOST=1397667581][/DOUBLEPOST]
The newest U.S. carrier will cost $13 billion. Add roughly 60 aircraft, 6,700 sailors, and other vessels to support and protect it, and a single U.S. carrier strike group costs roughly $6.5 million a day to operate.
So that's for the planes that come off the carrier. and if they launch tomahawks, they can knock them from the sky...btw...we do not have missiles that can intercept the S-400. keep that in mind. So any planes in the air...gone...as for the carrier which cost $13 billion......
- Types of target:[18]
- Strategic bombers such as the B1 Lancer, FB-111 and B-52
- Electronic warfare airplanes such as the EF-111A and EA-6
- Reconnaissance airplanes such as the TR-1
- Early-warning radar airplanes such as the E3-A and E2-C
- Fighter airplanes such as the F-15, F-16 and F-22
- Stealth airplanes such as the B-2 and F-117A
- Strategic cruise missiles such as the Tomahawk
- Ballistic missiles (range up to 3500km[19]).
China has inducted the world's first [1] anti-ship ballistic missile, known as the DF-21D.[2] In 2010, it was reported that China had entered the DF-21D into its early operational stage for deployment.[3] The potential threat from the DF-21D against US aircraft carriers has reportedly caused major changes in US strategy.[citation needed]
China is apparently working on a second generation ASBM using hypersonic glide vehicle technology tested on the WU-14. This would allow the warhead to search for the current location of the American carrier, instead of just dropping down to the spot it was first aimed at. The high speed maneuvers would also make the missile much harder to intercept.[4]
Russia has no interest in Libya, the fukk they gonna risk their troops for that shyt hole for? only we're stupid enough to do that. They just stand by and watch us waste our money. It benefits them for us to go to war. Thats one missile that can take out a $13 BILLION dollar strike team. ONE fukkING MISSILE. We're so stupid its not even funny. :rosslol:chinese are bums and they go on record many times saying they can't innovate sh1t.i see them cryin on pbs all the time.
i saw russia and china true colors when they voted against libyan war but barack and nato went in anyway and they just acted like they didn't want any part of it.
i think if they were so bad they'd move units to all these countries and defend them because it's a threat to their national security too. but they do nothing.
What you're not understanding is that the B2 is technology from the mid 1970s. It was kept secret for damn near 15 years. Off the books.
What's off the books now?
this dude hurt the US so heavy