Tad Devine helped create super delegates. And thats 100% fact. Who are the Democratic superdelegates and where did they come from?
Russiagate is this era's WMDs - A catastrophe for the reputation of the news media
- Thread starter FAH1223
- Start date
Its called campaigning.you believe that there were no efforts made by the clinton machine and the DNC to ensure she won the nomination in 2016that is an INSANE level of naivety
You and your white supremacist family voted for Trump. No need to pretend any more.
This is your country.
the cac mamba
Veteran
you're in denial, or just stupid. i'll go with both
I've asked for proof, all I've gotten is how much you, a white supremacist, loves trumpyou're in denial, or just stupid. i'll go with both
ogc163
Superstar
It seems like you need some help with logical communication. Let me try my best to assist you...
Avoiding the Issue
(also known as: avoiding the question [form of], missing the point, straying off the subject, digressing, distraction [form of])
Description:
When an arguer responds to an argument by not addressing the points of the argument. Unlike the strawman fallacy, avoiding the issue does not create an unrelated argument to divert attention, it simply avoids the argument.
Logical Form:
Person 1 makes claim X.
Person 2 makes unrelated statement.
Audience and/or person 1 forgets about claim X.
Example #1:
Daryl: Answer honestly, do you think if we were born and raised in Iran, by Iranian parents, we would still be Christian, or would we be Muslim?
Ross: I think those of us raised in a place where Christianity is taught are fortunate.
Daryl: I agree, but do you think if we were born and raised in Iran, by Iranian parents, we would still be Christian, or would we be Muslim?
Ross: Your faith is weak -- you need to pray to God to make it stronger.
Daryl: I guess you’re right. What was I thinking?
Explanation: Some questions are not easy to answer, and some answers are not easy to accept. While it may seem, at the time, like avoiding the question is the best action, it is actually an abandonment of reason and honest inquiry; therefore, fallacious.
Avoiding the Issue
the cac mamba
Veteran
no you haven't. you're lashing out like a scorned woman
you believe that there were no efforts made by the clinton machine and the DNC to ensure she won the nomination in 2016
You believe Trump made no effort to coordinate with Russia even after he was on TV asking Russia to hack Hillary's emails and after his son said the Trump Tower meeting was about adoptions?
At least I have listed facts.
You are calling me naive but giving me conjecture. Get out of your feelings and show me proof and stop being two faced.
Greenwald spells this whole ordeal out perfectly.
the next guy
Superstar
And he was wrong.
the cac mamba
Veteran
the proof is in the fact that NO PROMINENT DEMOCRATS felt like running for president in 2016. if you don't think that was by design, you're a fukkin foolYou believe Trump made no effort to coordinate with Russia even after he was on TV asking Russia to hack Hillary's emails and after his son said the Trump Tower meeting was about adoptions?
At least I have listed facts.
You are calling me naive but giving me conjecture. Get out of your feelings and show me proof and stop being two faced.
edit: i forget that youre not an american
i wouldnt expect you to understand how our politics works. my bad :jaymelo:
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Even if you say collusion happened and Mueller or Burr dropped the ball. The media still has to be accountable about how this played out. They predicted numerous times Trump would resign, Trump would be impeached, Trump and his kids and in laws would be indicted. They also gave Mueller the utmost respect for having integrity. Their opinions on how this would play out were just flat out wrong. They didn't know and still don't know what they are talking about. They threw red meat at the Dem base painting the most optimistic picture for people who hate Trump instead of mentioning the possibilities of other outcomes. Very similar to 2016 election. To them it was impossible for Hillary to lose and they were wrong.
They need to report the news as it happens and stop interjecting their opinions and predictions. It won't happen but them presenting themselves and their guests as experts needs to stop. When you're wrong this often you're not an expert. You lost all credibility.
They need to report the news as it happens and stop interjecting their opinions and predictions. It won't happen but them presenting themselves and their guests as experts needs to stop. When you're wrong this often you're not an expert. You lost all credibility.
Greenwald believes Mueller can't prove collusion but thinks Mueller is wrong about the Russians hacking the DNC.
Pick one.