RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,342
Reputation
17,660
Daps
146,236
Reppin
Humanity
Man just looks like a Turkey too me :yeshrug:

Went a bit left with the joke (or right :troll:) but it was strictly random mash together

envision ass cheeks on another man's neck, brehs.


full
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,260
Reppin
The Deep State


Dems Move to Block Trump From Lifting Sanctions on Russian Oligarch Oleg Deripaska
Newly empowered Democrats are trying to force the administration’s hand on Manafort-linked Oleg Deripaska.
01.04.19 4:38 PM ET
Congressional Democrats are gaming out strategies to try to reverse the Trump administration’s controversial decision last month to lift sanctions on businesses controlled by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), a member of the House intelligence committee, told The Daily Beast he has been discussing the matter with other members. And he’s eager for Trump administration officials to answer lawmakers’ questions about their move.

“I think senior Treasury people should come to the Hill and explain this deal,” he said, referring to the agreement between the U.S. and Deripaska that allowed the sanctions to be lifted.

“We need to get more information fast,” he added, “and of course the leverage that we have is a resolution of disapproval.”


While House Democrats are considering their own response, Senate Democrats have taken more concrete steps. On Friday, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) took the first formal step in registering his caucus’ discomfort with the sanctions relief by setting the table for a resolution of disapproval.

“I do so not because I have concluded that Congress should act to disapprove this agreement—I have not made that determination yet—but to preserve the procedural option of moving to bring up such a resolution at the end of the review process, if necessary, for expedited review and a vote by the full Senate,” Schumer said in a statement.

In his statement, Schumer said lawmakers will continue to assess the basis for the Trump administration’s decision to provide sanctions relief to Deripaska-linked businesses.

If Schumer decides to file a resolution of disapproval, the effort would face a tough path toward success. It would need simple majorities in both the House and Senate in order to reach President Donald Trump’s desk. But Trump would almost certainly veto the measure, so lawmakers would need to cobble together enough votes to override a presidential veto.


If successful, the resolution would prevent the Treasury Department from lifting sanctions on the Deripaska-controlled companies EN+, Rusal, and EuroSibEnergo. A mechanism in the 2017 Russia sanctions package, the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), would trigger the reversal. Passed overwhelmingly by Congress over Trump’s objections, CAATSA allows the House and Senate to block White House efforts to alter sanctions by passing a joint resolution of disapproval within 30 days of the administration’s announcement.

Lawmakers involved in the talks told The Daily Beast that CAATSA appeared to be the best legislative vehicle to block the lifting of sanctions on the Deripaska-linked businesses.

Deripaska has proven to be an inviting target for lawmakers. His ties to Trump’s former campaign chief Paul Manafort, which Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team has investigated, run deep. And the nature of the deal concerns Democrats. Lord Barker, a member of the U.K.’s House of Lords, chairs EN+ and helped negotiate the terms under which the Treasury Department would lift the sanctions on the businesses. Barker’s Russia ties have concerned some of his British colleagues, as The Daily Mail has detailed. The Guardian reported that a parliamentary committee asked Barker for information about his work for EN+, and he refused to provide anything publicly because of his work trying to lift U.S. sanctions.

Another concern for Democrats is the fact that Deripaska has maintained major holdings in the companies. As Treasury demanded, Deripaska’s stake in EN+ will go from 70 percent to just under 50 percent. He will still have major sway over the company’s activities. And he will transfer some of his EN+ shares to VTB Bank to pay down debt to the bank, as Bloomberg detailed. VTB is also under U.S. sanctions.


Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), one of the lawmakers who has been cued into the effort to preserve the sanctions, told The Daily Beast that lawmakers should act “in a way that avoids interference with any law enforcement investigations or the House’s possible investigations.” Other senators involved in the discussions include Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), both of whom have criticized the Trump administration’s implementation of mandatory sanctions against Russia.

House Democratic leaders have not yet committed to bringing up a resolution of disapproval, but Majority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) told The Daily Beast that “Democrats will look at all available options on this important issue.”

Last month, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin urging him to reconsider his push to lift the sanctions against Deripaska. But the administration announced two weeks later that it would formally lift them, prompting furious condemnation from Menendez and other lawmakers.

The administration has argued that the sanctions—which The Daily Beast first reported were conceived inadvertently and without following proper inter-agency protocols—were roiling international markets. European nations pleaded with the U.S. to lift the sanctions in particular targeting Rusal, a major global aluminum supplier which Deripaska controls, because the financial punishments against the company had triggered significant increases in aluminum prices worldwide.:ohhh:

In exchange for lifting the sanctions, Deripaska was required to abandon his majority ownership in EN+, the main company which has Rusal in its portfolio. Under the agreement, Deripaska must also add Americans to his corporate boards, and he will personally remain on the official U.S. list of sanctioned Russians. Menendez had said the sanctions should not be lifted “unless and until Mr. Deripaska divests from and relinquishes control of both companies.” Himes said he wants more information from the Treasury Department about the terms of the agreement.

“I think it’s important for us to dissect the specifics of a post-transaction EN+ and Rusal because one concern I have is that Mr. Deripaska will retain effective control with the transaction as outlined by Treasury,” Himes said.

Jamil Jaffer, who previously served as chief counsel and senior adviser to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where he helped write two sanctions laws targeting Russia, told The Daily Beast that Treasury’s move to lift sanctions on the Deripaska-linked businesses deserves more scrutiny from Capitol Hill.

“Given that Congress overwhelmingly pushed for these sanctions in a bipartisan fashion and provided the Treasury Department with the statutory authorities in play here and particularly because Russia continues its aggressive covert and overt influence campaign against the United States, close and continuing oversight is wholly appropriate and, indeed, is critical,” said Jaffer.

A Treasury Department spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Democrats’ potential move has drawn criticism from some former government officials. Dan Fried, a former State Department official who helped craft sanctions against Russia during the Obama administration, told The Daily Beast that he thinks Democrats should allow the sanctions be lifted.

“It may surprise you to hear this, given my reputation as a Putin hawk, but I think that Treasury made the right call in this deal,” Fried said. “They dug themselves out of a hole that they shouldn’t have jumped down in the first place. I think Deripaska certainly deserved to be sanctioned, but he would not have been my first choice because hitting Deripaska meant hitting Rusal, and that had downstream implications that I don’t think the U.S. government fully understood when they took that step.”

And Mike Dobson, a lawyer with the firm Morrison and Foerster who recently left the office within Treasury responsible for sanctions, said a congressional move to keep the sanctions in place would undermine Treasury’s credibility. Deripaska complied with Treasury’s requests, Dobson said, so failure by the U.S. government to uphold its end of the deal would signal to other potential sanctioned entities that changing their behavior could be fruitless.

“For Congress to come in and make what should be a straightforward administrative process into something political undermines the credibility of U.S. sanctions,” he said.
 
Last edited:

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,538
Reputation
5,759
Daps
112,719
Bernie cares about the 99% regardless of skin color. I don't know why you can possibly think POC could be worse off under progressives. Let's look at progressive policies, Universal Healthcare would be an immediate benefit to people of color and cacs the same. Free higher education, obviously benefits any marginalized class and the entire generation as a whole given the costs of education. Pro-union, alternative energy, how the fukk could that be worse than having an orange fat white nationalist crook in office. The elite are terrified of alexandria and Bernie, the smear tactics are already beginning and she is a fukking freshman.

Universal heathcare, free higher education etc are all great concepts. Hopefully they can be achieved with or without Bernie.
My sticking point has always been the idea that empowering the 99% fundamentally changes the way America is today. I strongly disagree with that. It isn't the nature of America, based on what I have seen.

America will never wipe out its original sins, and to pretend that economic franchisment is the fix is deliberately disingenuous, or worryingly glib.

Also ANY democrat is a better alternative to Trump. That's not a difficult reach.

Either way, I wasn't smearing them. I was simply being critical of a position.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,260
Reppin
The Deep State
Bernie cares about the 99% regardless of skin color. I don't know why you can possibly think POC could be worse off under progressives. Let's look at progressive policies, Universal Healthcare would be an immediate benefit to people of color and cacs the same. Free higher education, obviously benefits any marginalized class and the entire generation as a whole given the costs of education. Pro-union, alternative energy, how the fukk could that be worse than having an orange fat white nationalist crook in office. The elite are terrified of alexandria and Bernie, the smear tactics are already beginning and she is a fukking freshman.
yeah, if only white voters, especially republicans agreed.
 

CSquare43

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
14,881
Reputation
10,169
Daps
53,706
he is setting the stage for a fence.
it's gotta be see through, right?
it's gotta be steel (metal...you know they are gonna use whatever they have laying around)...so a fence is gonna be his final fallback.

gonna be all
full
in front of the cameras but all
full
when he's by himself.

this fukking clown is so transparent and easy to see move.
he telegraphs EVERYTHING.



Think we'll be able to spring for the razor wire too?

l61215-steel-fence-3841.png
 

Ku$h Parker

I'm Nothin Correctable
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,137
Reputation
2,865
Daps
48,992
Reppin
Prime Minister of S.B. Westside
Oh I feel you

It's funny because...in college I wasn't big on politics but I was trying to understand all the little things. Even took a few Poli Sci classes.

How these cats move...when they say things on TV in a such a way that they're trying to convey a message to their "base" or to the audience

It really is an art political science.

But when I was in undergrad, in business school the thing that we focused on the most was ENRON. All my classes had a huge section on ethics and the legal ramifications of doing dumb shyt with your company. The whole Enron shyt was constantly drilled into our heads, and it was funny because when it happend, all the older heads were saying "Man...this Enron shyt...they're gonna be studying that for years. Entire curriculum will be based on it..." and I'd nod like yeah that's what we're discussing in all my classes:mjgrin:


My man....THIS shyt?? THIS TRUMP shyt RIGHT HERE????? Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu :banderas:

Motherfukkers are going to be studying this shyt FOR DECADES TO COME.

It's like a Tiramisu of fukkkery breh...that's the best way to describe it

I would go back to School just for the Trump fukkery Classes:ehh:

those people are amoral...they will do something then turn around and condemn someone else for doing the exact same thing...they dont care which is right or wrong..they just want/need everything to work out in their favor...the ends justify the means...

aannnd thats why the GoFundTheWall is at about $19 Million:francis:
 
Top