CurrencyChase
Banned
They are working on changing that.
RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Another rowdy ride...
Mueller could simply choose not to bring charges on certain crimes, allowing the states to do it instead.
:trumprussia:
Last edited:
The Odum of Ala Igbo
Hail Biafra!
That's the gamble.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
at least he was convicted/sex offender for life but it the whole thing is weird
I'd imagine a lot of it is the flex of being billionaire opposed to hundred millionaire
it was also before #metoo
Dameon Farrow
Superstar
whoa! You went all in with your doomsday forecast!
What grounds do you think they can use to kill the investigation?
Firing RR won't make that happen. Firing Sessions has jack shyt to do with it(he recused) and even firing Mueller won't stop shyt. It's too late to fire folks to stop the investigation. Unless you know something I don't. In which case I'm all ears. 
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Mantis Toboggan M.D.
Drink wolf cola
Like the alphabet boys would start playing by the rules for the first time ever in the worst case scenariowhoa! You went all in with your doomsday forecast!
What grounds do you think they can use to kill the investigation?
I’ve been thinking about this a lot. I dunno how many philosophy brehs we have on here, but I consider myself a post-modernist (i.e., everything is relative). This is a popular belief system in the liberal arts. It says there is no truth, just your interpretation of an event, based upon some previous conditioning. It made a ton of sense to me, existentially. However, one pitfall of the belief system is, well, Trump. He’s “postmodern” as fukk, in regard to his use of “alternative” facts and different viewpoints. This makes me think, perhaps that belief system is too dangerous. If a logical extension of this philosophy is something like the Trump admin, perhaps academics and philosophers should re-examine the benefit of such a worldview. 
I wish I was in school again to discuss this with philosophy scholars and students. shyt is kinda mind-boggling to me
Any of you ever thing about this? If so, I’d love to get your opinions
I wish I was in school again to discuss this with philosophy scholars and students. shyt is kinda mind-boggling to me
Any of you ever thing about this? If so, I’d love to get your opinions
2nd amendment
I’ve been thinking about this a lot. I dunno how many philosophy brehs we have on here, but I consider myself a post-modernist (i.e., everything is relative). This is a popular belief system in the liberal arts. It says there is no truth, just your interpretation of an event, based upon some previous conditioning. It made a ton of sense to me, existentially. However, one pitfall of the belief system is, well, Trump. He’s “postmodern” as fukk, in regard to his use of “alternative” facts and different viewpoints. This makes me think, perhaps that belief system is too dangerous. If a logical extension of this philosophy is something like the Trump admin, perhaps academics and philosophers should re-examine the benefit of such a worldview.
I wish I was in school again to discuss this with philosophy scholars and students. shyt is kinda mind-boggling to me
Any of you ever thing about this? If so, I’d love to get your opinions
great food for thought.
i'll drop a response to this tomorrow.
i'm not a "philosophy head" but i have some thoughts on the matter.