RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

LHilla

Pro
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
521
Reputation
130
Daps
1,851
Reppin
The deep chasms of my mind

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
13,512
Reputation
10,118
Daps
70,610
Reppin
Wakanda

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,055
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,002
Reppin
NULL
I'll take the opinion of the FBI, CIA, and NSA, not to mention the Director of National Intelligence, over an internet rando with a blog. :cambybp:

Current and former IC operatives have high confidence in the assessment.

Its not just "some blog", its from Crowdstrike, silly rabbit
From the article:

“U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year’s American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented datapublished by an influential British think tank.”

This retraction pulls the rug out from under CrowdStrike’s identification of the hacking group that supposedly broke into the Democratic National Committee’s server. Last year, the company announced that “Fancy Bear” – the name they gave to the hackers – had used identical tools and methods to hack into software used by the Ukrainian military, an act they claimed led to the destruction of 80% of the Ukrainians’ howitzers in their war with rebel forces. Up until that point, CrowdStrike had merely “suspected” that the Russians were behind the DNC hack. However, given the Ukrainian “evidence,” combined with the assumption that the rebels are “Russian-backed,” CrowdStrike head honcho Dmitri Alpervovitch told the Washington Post: “Now we have high confidence it was a unit of the GRU,” i.e. Russian military intelligence.

Their retraction means that “high confidence” has been considerably lowered down to the level of a mere “suspicion.” Forced to backtrack in light of VOA’s definitive takedown, CrowdStrike’s whole case collapses. Despite dubbing the alleged hackers with the nom de guerre of “Fancy Bear” – as in the Russian bear – the evidence that supposedly identifies whoever broke into the DNC servers as GRU agents is virtually nonexistent. And the remaining “evidence” is hardly impressive. As cyber-security expert James Bamford pointed out:

“Last summer, cyber investigators plowing through the thousands of leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee uncovered a clue.

“A user named ‘Феликс Эдмундович’ modified one of the documents using settings in the Russian language. Translated, his name was Felix Edmundovich, a pseudonym referring to Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky, the chief of the Soviet Union’s first secret-police organization, the Cheka.”

So why would the nefarious albeit highly skilled Russians leave this glaring clue – in Cyrillic, no less! — for all to see? Or was this “clue” deliberate misdirection on the part of the real hackers? The latter seems highly likely – not that the geniuses over at CrowdStrike would want to understand this. After all, they were paid by the Democratic National Committee, which used the incident to drum up a narrative that the evil Russians were trying to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump. Follow the money, folks – and Alperovitch’s position with the Atlantic Council, an organization that is assiduously trying to launch another cold war with Moscow.

Remember, the FBI never looked at the DNC servers: they depended on CrowdStrike — which has a $150,000 a year no bid contract to perform “security” services for the agency — to analyze the forensic evidence. Shawn Henry, CrowdStrike’s CSO and head of CrowdStrike Services, is a former assistant executive director of the FBI.

 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
24,268
Reputation
4,165
Daps
90,505
Reppin
New York City
The funny thing is you arent making any logical sense and using propaganda to argue your point

you brought up the "fact" that pro-bernie social media was influenced by Russia. I gave you a video of an actual bernie supporter disputing that claim and you said "i can ignore her disputes because she seems mentally unhinged", which is an ad-hominem. But you're the logical one:hhh::mjlol:.

So because you refuse to argue and dispute points like an adult, I called you on your own bluff. I knew you'd back down because you dont even believe your own bullshyt. :francis: You want to feel like a part of "something" so you join the circle jerk that is this thread.

So many emotions:russ:

Your false prophet Bernie aint getting elected, and because he's acting like a bytch with his donor list they are going to continue to ostracize him :francis:

Your concept of a trusted news source is some bytch who makes youtube videos:mjgrin:

Trump aint gonna make it 4 years:mjlol:

I am not taking a permaban bet with you cause that's stupid. The fact that you feel you've proved something about that says way more about you than it does about me:ufdup:

Now this isn't the thread for this back and forth NONSENSE so I got to put you on ignore pleighboi,:yeshrug:

Feel free to talk shyt to people like that is an accomplishment that somehow vindicates your manhood :mjlol:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,660
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,865
Reppin
The Deep State
ab4TtmC.gif


:laff::laff::laff:




@DonKnock @Hood Critic @LHilla @ReignAsKing @True Blue Moon @poRATCHETteacha @Sammy Steez @SJUGrad13 @88m3 @lotuseater80 @Cali_livin @Cobratron @Menelik II @RJY33 @greenygreen @jerniebert @Wepa Man @PlayerNinety_Nine @AZBeauty @Hogan in the Wolfpac @iceberg_is_on_fire @Airfeezy @wire28 @Atlrocafella @Ss4gogeta0 @smitty22 @Ms. Elaine @Reality @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @re'up @Call Me James @Blessed Is the Man @BaggerofTea @GnauzBookOfRhymes @THE MACHINE
 
Top