Russia one upped US if I'm reading this correctly. I'm guessing the Pentagon meeting earlier was to discuss this.
His wife got him to fall back? I still don't understand what game he was playing.
Because initially they will do everything in their power to put on a good show and prove how much better they are than the government
But eventually...as you are taught in Business 101 or any Intro to Economics class in Business School/College
THE PURPOSE OF A BUSINESS IS TO GENERATE PROFIT FOR ITS SHAREHOLDERS
This is why these fukkboys don't want the shyt taught in JHS or HS. Because if you let kids know just how fukked up unfettered Capitalism can truly be and it's history in this country, there's no way they would actively vote for their own downfall the way ~60% of this country chooses to do, every opportunity they get.
Once a business can, the quality of the service provided will decrease as long as it doesn't interfere with the continuation of profitability. This is evident in almost any industry in this country.
Prime Example? Facebook.
The Hill
44 mins ·
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt rented a DC condo co-owned by the wife of a top energy industry lobbyist with business ties to the agency, according to a explosive new report.
THEHILL.COM
Trump EPA chief lived in condo co-owned by energy industry lobbyist’s wife: report
Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt used to rent a Washington condo co-owned by the wife of a lobbyist with business…
get this fukker out of here already smfh
The Hill
44 mins ·
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt rented a DC condo co-owned by the wife of a top energy industry lobbyist with business ties to the agency, according to a explosive new report.
THEHILL.COM
Trump EPA chief lived in condo co-owned by energy industry lobbyist’s wife: report
Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt used to rent a Washington condo co-owned by the wife of a lobbyist with business…
get this fukker out of here already smfh
Congrats!!Pruitt should have been gone with Price was outted. He's grifting his ass off and doesnt seem to care a bit that its being reported constantly.
Off Topic: I just accepted a offer for a new job. I'm so happy! Its still within the government but more money!
So Schwartz is arguing that 1) trump is not a party to the agreement, 2) the LLC is the party to the agreement, 3) trump didnt know about the agreement but was still a beneficiary, 4) cohen was representing trump (who didnt know about the agreement), 5) Cohen although acting as a representative for trump, PERSONALLY paid stormy., 6) trump although not being a party to the agreement is listed on the agreement, 7) the arbitration clause refers to trump and stormy. 7) Cohen delayed the payments to daniels because he couldnt get in contact with trump in the final days of the election, BUT trump still wasnt a party.
haha. They want things to be viewed in different lenses based on who is asking questions. all of the above cannot be true.
edit: thanks to james delgado, 8) all while claiming that an affair didnt happen so this contract isnt necessary. I have read from some scholars the claiming the affair didnt happen is really important due to prenup laws.
double edit: I read that Cohen's lawyer in regard to points 1-3 that Cohen himself wasnt trump's lawyer in this regard. HAHAHA everything that they discussed regarding the settlement isnt protected by the attorney client privileged based on his own lawyers admissions.