RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
88,191
Reputation
3,616
Daps
157,221
Reppin
Brooklyn



The Hill
44 mins ·
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt rented a DC condo co-owned by the wife of a top energy industry lobbyist with business ties to the agency, according to a explosive new report.


THEHILL.COM

Trump EPA chief lived in condo co-owned by energy industry lobbyist’s wife: report
Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt used to rent a Washington condo co-owned by the wife of a lobbyist with business…


get this fukker out of here already smfh
 

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,840
Daps
88,730
Reppin
Houston
Because initially they will do everything in their power to put on a good show and prove how much better they are than the government

But eventually...as you are taught in Business 101 or any Intro to Economics class in Business School/College

THE PURPOSE OF A BUSINESS IS TO GENERATE PROFIT FOR ITS SHAREHOLDERS

This is why these fukkboys don't want the shyt taught in JHS or HS. Because if you let kids know just how fukked up unfettered Capitalism can truly be and it's history in this country, there's no way they would actively vote for their own downfall the way ~60% of this country chooses to do, every opportunity they get.

Once a business can, the quality of the service provided will decrease as long as it doesn't interfere with the continuation of profitability. This is evident in almost any industry in this country.

Prime Example? Facebook.


Privatization is done for 2 main reasons:

1) - To reduce the amount of “regulations”.

2) - To help rich friends/associates in that industry.

Let’s look at point number one, who exactly does getting rid of these regulations benefit? Well, regulations are generally put in as a response to some injustice in that field that needed to be corrected so either a law was passed or a lawsuit occurred that resulted in this new practice of safer operation for both parties involved.
For example, many of you probably remember the story a few years ago where a lady sued McDonalds for “their coffee being too hot” and burning her. In response to this, McDonalds then put the “Warning! Contents May Be Hot!” disclaimer on their cups.

So when these companies want to get rid of regulations they are trying to roll back the progress that has been made in keeping consumers safe so that they can cut corners and save time to try and make more profits.

But what about those lawsuits that happened the first time around?

Well that’s why conservatives are pushing so hard on the Supreme Court composition because the current group is extremely pro-business and they are banking on different outcomes to some of these cases if they are litigated in front of a pro-business court.
 

resurrection

By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
5,402
Reputation
-340
Daps
16,882
Reppin
Dallas, TX



The Hill
44 mins ·
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt rented a DC condo co-owned by the wife of a top energy industry lobbyist with business ties to the agency, according to a explosive new report.


THEHILL.COM

Trump EPA chief lived in condo co-owned by energy industry lobbyist’s wife: report
Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt used to rent a Washington condo co-owned by the wife of a lobbyist with business…


get this fukker out of here already smfh
jfc-28353753.png
 

AZBeauty

Stop lyin' nicca.
Joined
Oct 23, 2012
Messages
5,920
Reputation
2,305
Daps
35,594
Reppin
Chicago, Il



The Hill
44 mins ·
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt rented a DC condo co-owned by the wife of a top energy industry lobbyist with business ties to the agency, according to a explosive new report.


THEHILL.COM

Trump EPA chief lived in condo co-owned by energy industry lobbyist’s wife: report
Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt used to rent a Washington condo co-owned by the wife of a lobbyist with business…


get this fukker out of here already smfh

Pruitt should have been gone when Price was outted. He's grifting his ass off and doesnt seem to care a bit that its being reported constantly.


Off Topic: I just accepted a offer for a new job. I'm so happy! Its still within the government :scusthov: but more money! :lawd:
 
Last edited:

resurrection

By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
5,402
Reputation
-340
Daps
16,882
Reppin
Dallas, TX
Pruitt should have been gone with Price was outted. He's grifting his ass off and doesnt seem to care a bit that its being reported constantly.


Off Topic: I just accepted a offer for a new job. I'm so happy! Its still within the government :scusthov: but more money! :lawd:
Congrats!!
 

CSquare43

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
14,881
Reputation
10,198
Daps
53,713
Regarding Michael Cohen's situation:

from reddit user patentattorney:

So Schwartz is arguing that 1) trump is not a party to the agreement, 2) the LLC is the party to the agreement, 3) trump didnt know about the agreement but was still a beneficiary, 4) cohen was representing trump (who didnt know about the agreement), 5) Cohen although acting as a representative for trump, PERSONALLY paid stormy., 6) trump although not being a party to the agreement is listed on the agreement, 7) the arbitration clause refers to trump and stormy. 7) Cohen delayed the payments to daniels because he couldnt get in contact with trump in the final days of the election, BUT trump still wasnt a party.

haha. They want things to be viewed in different lenses based on who is asking questions. all of the above cannot be true.

edit: thanks to james delgado, 8) all while claiming that an affair didnt happen so this contract isnt necessary. I have read from some scholars the claiming the affair didnt happen is really important due to prenup laws.

double edit: I read that Cohen's lawyer in regard to points 1-3 that Cohen himself wasnt trump's lawyer in this regard. HAHAHA everything that they discussed regarding the settlement isnt protected by the attorney client privileged based on his own lawyers admissions.


Make
Attorneys
Get
Attorneys

:whew:
 
Top