RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

jay211

Superstar
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
16,165
Reputation
1,459
Daps
44,945
Reppin
NULL
I'm confused. It POPA got pooped by the feds for lying. Why hasn't Mueller picked up Don Jr yet and indicted him? And Kushner. They both lied to feds, why aren't they in custody?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,057
Reppin
The Deep State


Opinion | Did Russia teach Paul Manafort all its dirty tricks?

Did Russia teach Paul Manafort all its dirty tricks?

MANAFORT007.JPG

Years from now, historians may study the documents indicting Paul Manafort to understand just how the Russification of American public life was accomplished. Manafort is alleged to have laundered money, to have cheated on taxes and to have lied about his clientele. All of this he did in order to “enjoy a lavish lifestyle in the United States,” according to the indictment. Among other things it is alleged that he spent $1,319,281 of his money, illegally hidden from the U.S. Treasury, to pay a home lighting and entertainment company in Florida; to purchase $934,350 worth of rugs at a shop in Virginia; and to drop $655,500 on a landscaper in the Hamptons.

Some will find it ironic that Manafort did all of this while coaching candidate Donald Trump to run an “anti-elite” election campaign, one directed at “draining the swamp” and cleaning up Washington. But in fact, this is exactly the kind of tactic that Manafort perfected on behalf of Russia, in Ukraine, where he worked for more than a decade.

Manafort was first invited to work in Ukraine in 2004, by the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. But Manafort left a real mark in 2006, when he brought dozens of American political consultants to Ukraine to assist in an ethnically charged election that pit Russian and Ukrainian speakers against one another, in an attempt to help Russia retain influence over the country. In 2008, he helped run an anti-NATO campaign, opposing Ukraine’s membership in the transatlantic alliance. In 2010, he was one of several advisers — the others were mostly Russians — who helped remake the image of Viktor Yanukovych, the ex-con whom the Russian government then supported for president of Ukraine. Yanukovych charged the sitting government with corruption, declared that the election would be “rigged” and finally won.

All of this experience came in handy in 2016. The exploitation of ethnic tension; the dislike of NATO; the constant talk of opponents’ corruption, whether warranted or not; the shouting about falsified elections — these were Trump tactics, too. Several other things about Yanukovych — who was eventually chased out of his own country— stand as a warning. He was an “anti-elite” candidate who proved far more corrupt than the existing elite. He used his public office for private gain. And he sought to undermine Ukraine’s constitution, first subtly and then openly.

The indictment published Monday doesn’t establish Manafort as a link between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, although it does allege he broke other laws. Such a link emerges clearly in Monday’s other news story, the revelation that George Papadopoulos, a Trump foreign policy adviser, knew Russian hackers had attacked the Clinton campaign long before that fact was known to anyone else; as early as May 2016, Papadopoulos knew that Russia had “dirt” on Clinton.

But even if the Manafort indictment isn’t a smoking gun, it tells us something important. For a long time now, a part of the U.S. political and business class has been merging, ideologically and aesthetically, with its post-Soviet counterparts. The use of shell companies and Cypriot bank accounts; the over-the-top spending on clothes and houses; the profoundly cynical manipulation of ethnic or racial divides to win elections — these behaviors are now common to a particular set of sleazy operators on two continents. If this indictment is correct, Manafort is the living embodiment of this Russian-American convergence. And Trump, of course, is its apotheosis.


Read more from Anne Applebaum’s archive, follow her on Twitter or subscribe to her updates on Facebook.

Read more here:

Anne Applebaum: The critical questions on Russia

Colbert I. King: It’s time for the feds to follow the Russian money

The Post’s View: What a presidential president would have said about Mueller’s indictments

Michael Gerson: To what circle of hell are Republicans about to consign themselves?

Ann Applebaum: The secret to Trump: He’s really a Russian oligarch
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
78,782
Reputation
9,823
Daps
212,084
Think about this. A general in 2017 is praising a man who committed treason and waged a war that killed half a million people back when that was even more people than it is now against the United States in the name of preserving slavery.
I'm still in disbelief at this shyt. :dwillhuh:

It's gonna get buried because of what happened today, but my god...if he ever takes questions from the press again, that should be the only thing they ask him.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
20,269
Reputation
6,121
Daps
63,660
Reppin
San Diego
I saw those attacks on the judges, and I may be wrong, but usually, the magistrate judges often handle arraignments and bail settings, and initial proceedings, and a District judge will handle as it moves towards a plea or trial, so these women whom are being defamed, will be out of the picture in a few court appearances.
 
Last edited:

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,881
Reputation
3,610
Daps
108,504
Reppin
דעת
I'm confused. It POPA got pooped by the feds for lying. Why hasn't Mueller picked up Don Jr yet and indicted him? And Kushner. They both lied to feds, why aren't they in custody?
The Feds usually allow cooperating witnesses to cop to lesser charges such as falsifying a statement in return for their cooperation.
 
Top