Lower standards were used to pressure Nixon to resign.It could be 100 and and I'd still be asking for evidence of collusion in a conversation about impeachment
RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Thats a good point.
Trump's lied about 400 times now about Russia.
For no reason?
Where have i said, there is no reason for the lies? or nothing to see here?Just asking for proof he colluded with Russians to win the election... if there is no actual evidence linking Trump himself to any collusion it shouldnt be presented as such.
What about that is so infuriating?
MoFo's ain't laughing at the Dossier anymore, huh?
IN
YOUR
DENIAL
OF
EVIDENCE.
LOOK, IF YOU DONT THINK EVIDENCE IS CONCLUSIVE, THATS ON YOU.
BUT YOU DON'T GET TO LOOK AT THE SAME EVIDENCE, AND THEN SAY ITS NOTHING.
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
EVIDENCE IS EVIDENCE.
IF YOU WANT SOMEONE TO PAINT THE PICTURE FOR YOU, YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE STOPPING THAT FROM HAPPENING.
CUCK.
YOUR
DENIAL
OF
EVIDENCE.
LOOK, IF YOU DONT THINK EVIDENCE IS CONCLUSIVE, THATS ON YOU.
BUT YOU DON'T GET TO LOOK AT THE SAME EVIDENCE, AND THEN SAY ITS NOTHING.
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
EVIDENCE IS EVIDENCE.
IF YOU WANT SOMEONE TO PAINT THE PICTURE FOR YOU, YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE STOPPING THAT FROM HAPPENING.
CUCK.
We have evidence that suggests hacker Yevgeniy Nikulin was one of the people sought to be paid for his services by Trump surrogates in hacking Anthony Weiner.
Dear Mr. Putin, Let’s Play Chess
Yevgeniy Nikulin Indicted for Hacking LinkedIn, Dropbox and Formspring
Alleged hacker held in Prague at center of 'intense' US-Russia tug of war
Im asking for help, but know has evidence of the claims they asserting as facts in this thread.
The main thing is that no one's trying to "prove" in any conclusive way that Trump has clear ties to Russia.
Most people are saying that there's enough evidence to warrant an investigation. Nap and a few others, including myself, believes there's enough evidence to begin impeachment hearings (though I think Dems should hold onto that Trump card for now--pun very much intended
). Is there "proof" that Trump directed the RNC to change their stance on Russia? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that Trump colluded with Russia to sway the election? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that Michael Flynn was assuring the Russian ambassador that sanctions would be dropped? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation, and Flynn resigning over it is extremely telling.
Is there "proof" that Trump's wiretapping claims are an attempt to deflect attention from the Russian scandal? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that the allegations in the unproven Trump dossier are a fact? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that most of Trump's top cabinet picks were in constant contact with Russia throughout Trump's campaign? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Should I keep going?
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
nap relax bytch damn
The main thing is that no one's trying to "prove" in any conclusive way that Trump has clear ties to Russia.
Most people are saying that there's enough evidence to warrant an investigation. Nap and a few others, including myself, believes there's enough evidence to begin impeachment hearings (though I think Dems should hold onto that Trump card for now--pun very much intended
Is there "proof" that Trump directed the RNC to change their stance on Russia? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that Trump colluded with Russia to sway the election? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that Michael Flynn was assuring the Russian ambassador that sanctions would be dropped? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation, and Flynn resigning over it is extremely telling.
Is there "proof" that Trump's wiretapping claims are an attempt to deflect attention from the Russian scandal? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that the allegations in the unproven Trump dossier are a fact? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Is there "proof" that most of Trump's top cabinet picks were in constant contact with Russia throughout Trump's campaign? No, but there's enough reasonable evidence to warrant an investigation.
Should I keep going?
I do, but their claims arent really posted here... not seriously at least.Wonders why I've never seen @DEAD7 calling for proof of trump or #trumpset random claims and accusations
comes with the "I wanna be down" black conservative annual subscription.Wonders why I've never seen @DEAD7 calling for proof of trump or #trumpset random claims and accusations
I really hate this administration. Unethical, untruthful, despicable group of people