RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

[Tribaligenesis]

look, i know that this is awful but read this sentence again

are we gonna act like this type of shyt hasnt existed in politics since the beginning of time?

are we gonna act like a democrat never oversaw anything like this happen? and please, i really want to see someone tell me this with a straight face

i just think its worth saving some of this outrage. it needs to be saved so the worst shyt can have everyones full attention. if the approach is 'we need to be mad at everything', credilibity is gonna fly out the window

Don't change the narrative, what the Democrats did or did not do is beside the point here. The nucleus of the matter remains the same, which is whether or not the Trump administration has colluded with the Russians to influence the democratic proces in the US. Hoarding of information is actually the best tactic in this case. The more of it you have, the more powerful your argument.

 

[Starman]

I've been on some right leaning sites and they're just as confident Trump will be exonerated and Dems will be implicated.

I'm off Monday and Tuesday. Let it go down! Do it for me, God!

 

[WaveMolecules]

look, i know that this is awful but read this sentence again

are we gonna act like this type of shyt hasnt existed in politics since the beginning of time?

are we gonna act like a democrat never oversaw anything like this happen? and please, i really want to see someone tell me this with a straight face

i just think its worth saving some of this outrage. it needs to be saved so the worst shyt can have everyones full attention. if the approach is 'we need to be mad at everything', credilibity is gonna fly out the window

Bears shyt in the woods. Yes, we know.

Currently, we are talking about an orange bear. And he shyt on our picnic table.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

What is this Ukraine deal everyone talking about. Also, wasn't that Michael Cohen's father in law?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/19/us/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-russia.html

 

[Tribaligenesis]

Having proxies in the administration is initself the definition of influencing the democratic process. Leaking one parties dirty laundry and withholding any information on the other is not influencing the democratic process? Or are you implying that the Republican's we're squeaky clean?



The question you'd have to ask yourself, would Trump have gotten this far without Russian influence through their proxies?

 

[DrDealgood]

Some of yall actually thought there wouldn't be many people in a state of constant, justified outrage after 1/20/17?

Dont worry nikka, we always gonna have a fresh supply and it's a multi level marketing scheme too, which Golden Don knows plenty about his dam self.

 

[the cac mamba]

Having proxies in the administration is initself the definition of influencing the democratic process. Leaking one parties dirty laundry and withholding any information on the other is not influencing the democratic process? Or are you implying that the Republican's we're squeaky clean?



The question you'd have to ask yourself, would Trump have gotten this far without Russian influence through their proxies?

nope the voting process was not affected. some voters minds might have been introduced a new idea. except it wasnt new we already knew who the DNC wanted to install

see a lot of clowns in here call this 'me caping for trump'. but what it is, is that i dont like to see the dems weaken their case, as i stated

and no, i dont believe this affected the election like that. becsause hillary voters who were ok with her corruption before the leaks, were cool aftetr the leaks

let me ask you this :

who the fukk didnt know the DNC was corrupt after the primaries

who the fukk needed russia leaking emails (of WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ) to know that the DNC preferred whillary clinton?

 

[the cac mamba]

Having proxies in the administration is initself the definition of influencing the democratic process. Leaking one parties dirty laundry and withholding any information on the other is not influencing the democratic process? Or are you implying that the Republican's we're squeaky clean?



The question you'd have to ask yourself, would Trump have gotten this far without Russian influence through their proxies?

no, it isnt

YOURE USING THE WRONG TERMINOLOGY. thats what i take issue with

it it influence? of course. did it influence democracy? no. thats just wrong

your argument also boils down to willful ignorance about the DNCs corruption being preferable you fukking sheep

 

[Tribaligenesis]

nope the voting process was not affected. some voters minds might have been introduced a new idea

see a lot of clowns in here call this 'me caping for trump'. but what it is, is that i dont like to see the dems weaken their case, as i stated

and no, i dont believe this affected the election like that. becsause hillary voters who were ok with her corruption before the leaks, were cool aftetr the leaks

let me ask you this :

who the fukk didnt know the DNC was corrupt after the primaries

who the fukk needed russia leaking emails (of WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED :mjlol) to know that the DNC preferred whillary clinton?

I couldn't give two fukks about Hilary Clinton but she is the lesser of the two evils, you are arguing through a moot point. Are you seriously implying that Trump would not be in prison if he was to be found guilty of colluding with the enemy? It would not have changed the results of the election, but it would have definitely changed the candidate running on the Republican ticket. Hilary has lost, bringing her up is just deflecting from the issue at hand.

 

[dtownreppin214]

His whole steez just makes me want to punch him in the face. I hate when either side does this "blind support of my party" shyt but I especially hate when dudes like him do it. Something about this cat, just like Cruz, has always rubbed me the wrong way and I can't put my finger on it nor would I want to cause I'd probably have to scrub that shyt with hot water and soap afterwards.

And he's always struck me as someone in way over his head, going back to Amateur Hour when he took a sip of water while trying to give the response after Obama's State of the Union.

I feel the complete opposite. I think he's going to be one of the few R's to come out of this unscathed. Cruz chose his party over his family. I'm truly disgusted by that vile creature. Rubio has been more measured in his support for this administration.

 

[the cac mamba]

I couldn't give two fukks about Hilary Clinton but she is the lesser of the two evils, you are arguing through a moot point. Are you seriously implying that Trump would not be in prison if he was to be found guilty of colluding with the enemy? It would not have changed the results of the election, but it would have definitely changed the candidate running on the Republican ticket. Hilary has lost, bringing her up is just deflecting from the issue at hand.

im saying trump did what hillary has been doing

you clowns are incapable of providing a rebuttal to this

at least tell me you would prefer bernie out of the three candidates?

 

[iFightSeagullsForBread]

in the words of george carlin, " this country keeps electing rich cocksuckers who dont give a fukk about you. they dont GIVE a fukk about you, THEY DONT GIVE A fukk about you"

now which candidate, between donald trump and hillary clinton, doesnt fit into that sentence

Raj

But you still gonna give DT a chance huh.

 

[the cac mamba]

But you still gonna give DT a chance huh.

what choice do we have?

the man is a piece of shyt.his opponent was piece of shyt as well

whats the opposite of giving him a chance lets hear it. jsut be careful what you type

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Why hasn't @the cac mamba been banned yet

 

[DrDealgood]

The ignore function is a beautiful thing.