godkiller
"We are the Fury"
Land reform started in the late 90s, Zimbabweans started invading farms. Mugabe was able to hold that off until the early 2000s. .
" In the late 1990s, Prime Minister Tony Blair terminated this arrangement when funds available from Margaret Thatcher's administration were exhausted, repudiating all commitments to land reform. Zimbabwe responded by embarking on a "fast track" redistribution campaign, forcibly confiscating white farms without compensation.[4]"
You're arguing semantics. Mugabe enacted land reforms right after the British reneged on their contract to do land reform themselves, which was in the early 2000s, exactly as I said.
Then he helped it to go threw when the white farmers were going to replace himThen he helped it to go threw when the white farmers were going to replace him. Replace his party/him with MDC/Tsvangirai. He didn't do it because he wanted to, but to save his own ass.
Do you have any real proof of these assertions? Furthermore, even if Mugabe did get rid of the whites to protect his own seat, he still ended colonialism and white control of Zimbabwe. So he's good done either way.
Dude killed thousands of blacks in the gukurahundi and constantly takes money out of the country. So nah man, he isn't pro-black.
What happened in Gukurahundi was a civil war of sorts between two rival parties wherein both sides lost people. Zanu-PF lost men and the ZAPU, which recruited from the Ndebele-speaking region, lost men. Mugabe was on the ZANU-PF side and ZAPU lost more men when Mugabe's faction won out. Through his "terrorism", Mandela killed fellow blacks too. These incidents do not mitigate what Mugabe also did, which was defeat Ian Smith's forces, captur Ian Smith and forcibly end apartheid in his country. Cacs like you love to point to "black-on-black violence" as an excuse for colonialism. fukk off with that.