And so do all the other ATGs breh. So what is the point of bringing up SKILL SET WHEN WE ARE DISCUSSING THE LEGENDS OF BOXING. ALL OF THEM ARE VERY SKILLED WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE ALL TIME GREATS IN THE FIRST PLACE
The ONLY way to breakdown the ATGs and HOFers is by resume. Not "skills". They are all the best of the best.
My G, you clearly jumped into a discussion me and someone else was having in mid stream. The skill set point is directed to people hiding behind the "how many HOF opponents he have" argument. These cats like Greb who get propped up for having all these HOF opponents don't match up with Floyd skill wise. At some point, the person's ability to BOX should account for something. People in here dismissing Floyd even though his skills are arguably the best in history PLUS he has the resume to back it up. And for you to say the ONLY way to breakdown ATG and HOF'ers is resume and not skills is a slap in the face to the guys out there boxing. I take the HOF argument with a grain of salt, cause even in the HOF there are levels to the guys who are in there. As I stated before, Arturo Gatti is in the HOF. He doesn't automatically get the same reverence as Ali just cause they're both famers. So for all the cats that love to reach back and talk up a fighter from the 1920's, I just want to know what level of famer does Greb have on his resume? A bunch of Gatti's or a bunch of Ali's? And since that is a fair question to ask, you must insert some context into the argument instead of hiding behind blanket statements like "he has more HOF opponents". I stated before when talking to the other dude, if you don't think Floyd is the GOAT, cool....but to completely dismiss a man who has been a world champion since 1998, 28 title fights, lineal champion in 4 weight classes, champ in 5 weight classes, 10 time champ, and undefeated at least until he's 37 years old in 46 fights (all but 3 ending in KO or UD) as someone who isn't in the discussion does the sport a disservice.