So did cracker.
No it has not.
Okay, what year did ****** become that tool?
When white people decided yo justify enslaving us by deeming as inferior, less than human. You stupid fukk.
No, it doesn't. There have been definitions
posted in this thread that was more than "racist white person". It's more than that.
I'm not talking about definitions, I'm talking in the context that it's used here on this site. When its used here its used as slang for white people. Besides, even in the definitions you posted its not a racial slur and only an insult when used in a certain context.
What the hell are you talking about? This is how I know you are an idiot. I don't think blacks should be just as nasty as whites were in the past (and some still are) and use racially charged terms to refer to white people. I think that because I wouldn't want anyone using racially negative terms against me and my people. So that means I'm some sort of uncle-tom that hates my race? GTFO! Bigotry begets bigotry. You admit that cracker could be used to denigrate whites, (although you don't think it's a racial slur
) and that is all I'm speaking out against. That, in no way, means I hate my race. Fukk outta here with that bullshyt.
I was talking about black people in general, but obviously the point went over your empty head. Black people have a much bigger problem with self hate than we do with being racist against other people. The nerve of you insulting me when you're too stupid to even understand me. I'm not arguing for blacks to be as nasty as whites has been you numbskull. I'm simply arguing that cracker is not a racist term. All that nonsense about bigotry be getting bigotry is irrelevant. Referring to whites as crackers does not make one a bigot. Get that straight.