Record low all star game ratings… by a WIDE MARGIN

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
71,733
Reputation
8,162
Daps
216,941
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
:russ:

And y'all still believe they're getting $75 billion for their media rights.

The NFL could put on a flag football league tomorrow with practice players and have more viewers than the NBA regular season.
It’ll probably be $50 billion over 10 years.

Disney (ABC/ESPN) paying $2 billion per year.

WBD (TNT) paying $2 billion per year.

Then a third partner let’s say Comcast (NBC) pays $1 billion a year.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
10,930
Reputation
2,567
Daps
36,007
Reppin
Los Angeles
At this point, put the game at the end of the play-offs like the Pro Bowl.

Final send-off game before the off-season and any champions on the team can have one game to show off their championship status.

Lowkey an NFL celebrity flag football would be fun af to watch. End zone dances by some of these artists would be :banderas:
 

FunkDoc1112

Heavily Armed
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
19,244
Reputation
5,733
Daps
100,254
Reppin
The 718
Compare the ASG from 11 years ago to today:



Right from the start, there's at least a bare minimum of effort. Any 1-on-1 matchup was taken seriously, guys are still having to set screens, there's even half-hearted transition defense. Are they still getting the fukk out of dodge for dunks? Yeah. But none of the "No sir, after you" bullshyt we had on Sunday.
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,485
Reputation
1,988
Daps
40,606
It’ll probably be $50 billion over 10 years.

Disney (ABC/ESPN) paying $2 billion per year.

WBD (TNT) paying $2 billion per year.

Then a third partner let’s say Comcast (NBC) pays $1 billion a year.

Even that is NFL money per media partner though. ESPN right now pays 2.7 billion per year to broadcast MNF for an average of 21 million viewers per game. NBA averages around 1-2 million per game. The math doesn't add up for ESPN to pay that much for a Bron-less, KD-less, Curry-less NBA.

Their current deal is $24 billion for 9 years. They're starting the media push for $75 billion now and Iger/Zaslav gotta be laughing in their office at that number. Even $50 billion is a Dr. Evil number.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
71,733
Reputation
8,162
Daps
216,941
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Even that is NFL money per media partner though. ESPN right now pays 2.7 billion per year to broadcast MNF for an average of 21 million viewers per game. NBA averages around 1-2 million per game. The math doesn't add up for ESPN to pay that much for a Bron-less, KD-less, Curry-less NBA.

Their current deal is $24 billion for 9 years. They're starting the media push for $75 billion now and Iger/Zaslav gotta be laughing in their office at that number. Even $50 billion is a Dr. Evil number.
Disney is paying like $1.4 billion per year. Another $600M ain’t out of the question.

WBD is paying like $1.2 billion per year right now.

So you’re thinking the league bringing a third partner will only get them marginally closer to $35 billion over 10 years?
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,485
Reputation
1,988
Daps
40,606
Disney is paying like $1.4 billion per year. Another $600M ain’t out of the question.

WBD is paying like $1.2 billion per year right now.

So you’re thinking the league bringing a third partner will only get them marginally closer to $35 billion over 10 years?
Pretty much yeah. 40 tops.

Another $600 million isn't a drop in the bucket. That's almost a 50% increase in price on a re-up for ESPN and even more for Warner for a declining product.

They can't just claim for their partners to pay +50% or more without justification. Warner just spent a ton on Charles and the gang so I think they'll keep the rights, I don't get what value they're presenting their partners with the extreme increased cost other than pointing to it being live sports
 
Top