Do you believe in seeing your own reflection?
Yes because light can reflect. Do you?
Do you believe in seeing your own reflection?
I didn't ignore your request, but you can't sit there and make a claim and then ask me to provide reasoning behind the contrary when you haven't initially done the same yourself. It almost mirrors the base argument in this thread, as a whole.Ok you chose to ignore my request so If you come back to me with some semantic shyt I'm going to neg you off gp.
That would mean that "faith" and science are tangibly the same - when we know they're not. Therefore they possibly can't be measured in the same vacuum and they possibly can't have the same outcome(s). It's as if you're theoretically applying the law of parsimony without realizing beforehand that they're not both equally plausible.Atheism is just as bad as organised religion because it is based on the assumption that any concept that cannot be proved with in the confines of the science/technology currently available to us must be discreditted.
Opposing organized religions can be classified as being just as bad as one another, because they work under the same laws and principles. A non-belief/lack of belief system however does not.Organised religion teaches that any concept that does not fall within the confines of their respective dogma must be discredited.
When you look in the mirror, do you see yourself or do you see a person that is a parody of yourself?Yes because light can reflect. Do you?
And who do you believe created this fallacy?My g reason determined that the earth was flat at one point come on man
And who do you believe created this fallacy?
Who are these men of science and reason?Men of science and reason using the tools available to them at the time
Jesus is a brown man, just like the Jews were 2000 years ago. The Jewish people were made up of different races.when did i say all? i think id be pretty confident in throwing a healthy bet at more than 50%
and of course maybe im wrong the mainstream legacy of 'jesus' in america, IS a white man
The irony coming from people openly wearing little statues of a dead dude on a cross everywhere they go tawkin bout other people always needing to tell otgers what they all about
I didn't ignore your request, but you can't sit there and make a claim and then ask me to provide reasoning behind the contrary when you haven't initially done the same yourself. It almost mirrors the base argument in this thread, as a whole.
That would mean that "faith" and science are tangibly the same - when we know they're not. Therefore they possibly can't be measured in the same vacuum and they possibly can't have the same outcome(s). It's as if you're theoretically applying the law of parsimony without realizing beforehand that they're not both equally plausible.
Opposing organized religions can be classified as being just as bad as one another, because they work under the same laws and principles. A non-belief/lack of belief system however does not.
We know what atheism is, and we know it doesn't function with the same rationale as "organized religion". The question is why are you measuring them with the same scale?We coming from different start points my g you still talking in terms of religious laws and preconceptions. Thats why I asked for you definition of atheism so we on the same page but you ignored the request and then said you didnt ignore it
Don't mince words. Science is tangible. Faith is not. Faith works on the principle of not having tangible proof. You need to reassess on how you think two separate entities of structure, who have polar opposite laws and principles are equally as bad as one another - all in the fold of one making a claim and the other not.Faith and science are not the same thing but you need faith in your scientific method to trust that your evidence is true. If that's what your arguement is based on you need to reassess my g.
Who are these men of science and reason?
Is it common knowledge that there was once a concept of the Earth being flat? Yes. I ask you, who are these "men of science and reason" that came up with this?fukk outta here thats common knowledge don't insult me like that.
You don't know how privedged you are to have this exchange with me don't be ignorant yout.
I don't understand the thought process of this - like somehow the vice versa of this isn't true?There is nothing wrong with being an atheist but they are some miserable fukks. They care more about trashing religions than just minding their own business
The image seen is of self, not a parody. You didn't answer my question.When you look in the mirror, do you see yourself or do you see a person that is a parody of yourself?