at the first part. Yes to what?So either you're not aware you're a troll or you don't want to admit you're a troll. Yes.
at the first part. Yes to what?So either you're not aware you're a troll or you don't want to admit you're a troll. Yes.
Quote me on talking about them.
Fail at trolling brehs
Yes to the question.at the first part. Yes to what?
FrederickDouglas said:That's the point. You can't prove that ANYTHING does not exist.
That's the point. You can't prove that ANYTHING does not exist.
You can't prove leprechauns, werewolves, Santa Claus, or Superman don't exist, especially when people keep moving the goalposts regarding their existence.
"I don't believe in leprechauns. There's no proof for their existence."
"But you have no proof that they don't exist, so you shouldn't question my belief in leprechauns. We both don't have proof so our stances are equal."
It's the same with proving a creator doesn't exist. You can't, simply by virtue of the fact that you can't prove any fictional character doesn't exist.
That's why the burden of proof is on people who claim something exists and not the other way around.
denial is not just a river in EgyptYeah you're right
still see more atheist doing this tho
Yes to the question.
Atheists don't make factual claims that a higher power doesn't exist. Misconceptions 101.One thing i can prove is you and others lack reading comprehension. None of my arguments are regarding the existance or lack of existance of something. My argument is both sides are idiots as both speak of something as fact with literal no facts and want to force their idealologies on others. Athiest call religious people dumb yet they are doing the exact same thing.
fukk yeah! Hitler, Stalin, Chairman Mao and all kinds of brutal people have millions of bodies under their belt. In the same few decades, those a$$holes wiped out a lot of people. Over 100,000,000.Atheism is worse than any organized religion.
Not the same thing, but...Prove leprechauns don't exist
Because you made the claim. I have no issue with answering your questions, I do however have issue with you turning around and making me the 'prove-your-point' party. Don't say you can jump yay high with a direct visual hand signal and then ask me what I think the definition of jump is.
Yes this reeks of self-importance -
Laws and principles of what make up "organized religions" and atheism aren't subjective - they're polar opposites. Why are you still having a hard time comprehending this? This is the very reason why I purposefully didn't allow you to twist this into being a coginate discussion and why I didn't provide a bullet point exemplar of the bad fruit that one may eat from the religion tree, knowing full well you'd turn this into some smart dumb faux-existential nihilism coverup to mask your inability to have a coherent discussion.
Yet here you are using pompous "man-made" concepts to quantify how your speck of being has more importance than another speak of being in "an infinite universe", with only the knowledge of a few keyboard strokes. Do you take pride in stabbing yourself with your own knife?
This is beyond corny.
atheists are just like vegetarians.
False. There are no married bachelors.