Reading what's trending on #blackatheist on Twitter gives me hope

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

What the fukk is wrong with you, read through our discourse again. Apart from my first post in here the rest of my responses were answers to your questions fukkboy so don't talk to me about wandering onto another path. I don't make a habit of talking in circles and I'm not going to re-quote our convo in the post and walk you through it.

If you lack the comprehension skills to understand what I've written to you thus far let's not take this any further.

Again, you've made a claim, but you haven't detailed the process in which you took to come to that conclusion. Are you being dense on purpose because you know if you delve, you'll see the error in your judgement? How is atheism just as bad as organized religion? What are the laws behind atheism? How can atheism have the same outcome of system that tells its own story?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@DreadBrown since you're having a hard time following -

A person pours boiling water into a bucket and tells you once you put your right foot in, the water will turn cold, immediately. Another person tells you not to do this because it's nonsense/there's no substantial evidence that this is possible. Now how can the person telling you not to do this, be just as bad as the person that's telling you to put your foot in a bucket of boiling water?

 

[DreadBrown]

@DreadBrown since you're having a hard time following -

A person pours boiling water into a bucket and tells you once you put your right foot in, the water will turn cold, immediately. Another person tells you not to do this because it's nonsense/there's no substantial evidence that this is possible. Now how can the person telling you not to do this, be just as bad as the person that's telling you to put your foot in a bucket of boiling water?

I'm going to entertain you for a couple more rounds because I feel like you're down for the scrap.

The hypothetical you pose is flawed when looking at the existenial question. (I want you to note how I make no reference to any kind of 'god'). You start from a position of bias, presuming malicious intent one side asking if one is 'just as bad' when good and bad are subjective concepts. For it to be a true comparison neither parties would have conclusive knowledge of the outcome and would be 'just as bad' as the other for asking the third party to believe them. You also seem to assume that the third party is some kind of perpetual victim who can't make a decision for themselves.

I say all that to say this, the hypothetical you pose is flawed and cannot be effectively applied to the existential question.

 

[DreadBrown]

Again, you've made a claim, but you haven't detailed the process in which you took to come to that conclusion. Are you being dense on purpose because you know if you delve, you'll see the error in your judgement? How is atheism just as bad as organized religion? What are the laws behind atheism? How can atheism have the same outcome of system that tells its own story?

You're going to have to give me your definition of an atheist if you really want me to answer this or we are going to end up arguing semantics.

 

[Nymbus]

Yo imma just ask (state) this here:
If you don't believe Jesus is your savior you go to hell right? If you don't live right by Allah you go to hell right? If you don't live right by the Hindu god you go to their hell. Etc etc
Youre gonna end up in somebody's hell regardless. Religion is all beliefs so whatever you believe in is what you get. The failure to not believe doesn't change anything.

 

[Pepe La Hues]

just be happy that the earth is perfectly distanced from the sun and the ozone layer is what protects your dumb ass from being burnt to a crisp...but thats not by design huh.

 

[usopp]

atheist are the worse than jahova witness because they love preaching, at least jahova's preach about what they believe in, atheist steady preaching about what they don't believe in.

I don't believe in the tooth fairy, I don't try and off load my views onto everyone else, if you don't believe why you feel the need to convert people

They feel threatened, so they react. That's human nature. But, they also like to push their ideals onto people, like the Catholics did in the past.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

The hypothetical you pose is flawed when looking at the existenial question. (I want you to note how I make no reference to any kind of 'god'). You start from a position of bias, presuming malicious intent one side asking if one is 'just as bad' when good and bad are subjective concepts.

Bias? Do you understand what bias means? How can one possibly be bias if one approaches simply by reason? Is the above dilemma out of subjectivity to what is good and bad? Is there any bad outcome from not putting your foot in the boiling water?

For it to be a true comparison neither parties would have conclusive knowledge of the outcome and would be 'just as bad' as the other for asking the third party to believe them.

You can't result this to a null sum and shift the burden of proof onto one that doesn't make the claim. That's not how it works.

You also seem to assume that the third party is some kind of perpetual victim who can't make a decision for themselves.

I'm sure you know the lining of this.

I say all that to say this, the hypothetical you pose is flawed and cannot be effectively applied to the existential question.

I'm gathering more and more, that you have absolutely no idea of what you're talking about, and are just continuing to dig the hole you stumbled upon out of reluctance to admit your original statement was nonsense.

 

[usopp]

i cant speak on that only what happens in this country. and i think that any rejection of that jesus^^^^^^ is healthy and productive

Of course you do, because you are a closet homosexual.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You're going to have to give me your definition of an atheist if you really want me to answer this or we are going to end up arguing semantics.

I'm asking you. You're the one that made the claim.

"Again, you've made a claim, but you haven't detailed the process in which you took to come to that conclusion. Are you being dense on purpose because you know if you delve, you'll see the error in your judgement? How is atheism just as bad as organized religion? What are the laws behind atheism? How can atheism have the same outcome of system that tells its own story?"

 

[DreadBrown]

Bias? Do you understand what bias means? How can one possibly be bias if one approaches simply by reason? Is the above dilemma out of subjectivity to what is good and bad? Is there any bad outcome from not putting your foot in the boiling water?

You can't result this to a null sum and shift the burden of proof onto one that doesn't make the claim. That's not how it works.

I'm sure you know the lining of this.

I'm gathering more and more, that you have absolutely no idea of what you're talking about, and are just continuing to dig the hole you stumbled upon out of reluctance to admit your original statement was nonsense.

My nikka I do this! Like I said your senario was loaded for an outcome you desired I'm not a coli poster my g you can't draw me into these kind of traps I know my mind. Leave the hypothetics out of it going forward.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

My nikka I do this! Like I said your senario was loaded for an outcome you desired I'm not a coli poster my g you can't draw me into these kind of traps I know my mind. Leave the hypothetics out of it going forward.

My scenario was loaded for an outcome of REASON. Not bias. If you felt trapped by the scenario, clearly you don't wander down the path of logic and reason too often.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Now again, how did you come to the conclusion (detailing the process and your thought pattern) that "atheism is just as bad as organized religion"?

 

[DreadBrown]

I'm asking you. You're the one that made the claim.

"Again, you've made a claim, but you haven't detailed the process in which you took to come to that conclusion. Are you being dense on purpose because you know if you delve, you'll see the error in your judgement? How is atheism just as bad as organized religion? What are the laws behind atheism? How can atheism have the same outcome of system that tells its own story?"

Ok you chose to ignore my request so If you come back to me with some semantic shyt I'm going to neg you off gp.

Atheism is just as bad as organised religion because it is based on the assumption that any concept that cannot be proved with in the confines of the science/technology currently available to us must be discreditted.

Organised religion teaches that any concept that does not fall within the confines of their respective dogma must be discredited.

Simple as that your questions about laws and stories is irrelevant my meditation is higher than that.

 

[DreadBrown]

My scenario was loaded for an outcome of REASON. Not bias. If you felt trapped by the scenario, clearly you don't wander down the path of logic and reason too often.

My g reason determined that the earth was flat at one point come on man