He definitely dont have the hops. The explosiveness is there, but sporadically.Damn Blake did lose a step
Drummond is really good. I had no clue. He's like way better than Deandre.
Last edited:
He definitely dont have the hops. The explosiveness is there, but sporadically.Damn Blake did lose a step
Marks gonna draft a star with it
Did you not see me specifically write, "Yes, the injury cloud doesn't wane too far from Kyrie, but the Celtics have two elite-potential wings ready waiting in the wings."; I'm most definitely NOT trying to brush his injury-history aside, nor assign "perfect health" to him, you don't need to tell me about the state he's in/been in, I've acknowledged in the past that his career most likely will be cut short because of his injuries.
I'm simply giving laying out the alternative outcomes for both the Celtics and 76ers if their respective franchise pieces were out of the picture. Which is not only to outline to you that, it's a real possibility (given their respective states of health) but to show you that Boston has better pieces, in a better setup, to survive, if that were to occur.
And yes, Embiid is a better talent than both Tatum/Brown, but he's only ONE player, and a speck in the universe of what it takes for a franchise to have a successful future.
Why are you leaving out the important detail the 76ers continued to play him even when his shoulder still wasn't right? Why are you leaving the important detail(s) of their medical staff misdiagnosing/mishandling its players when it comes to injuries in the past?
Like I said, the Celtics have greater depth.
I was speaking in the context of this summer, if the pick doesn't fall where they want it to, they could make a move for a big man before the draft. It's still a valuable asset for the right suitor, regardless of where it falls. The second part of that portion of my post was centred around Horford's play going forward, as you seem to think his 'fall' and/or irreplaceability is this great factor in Boston's supposed ominous future. I was addressing both your points, separately.
You're starting to turn the ball over at a crazy rate, my breh.
Yes, it's worse (or not as good, if you need it to be euphemized), they're still in an unproven state, with no great foundation. I don't even see how this is even an argument? The Celtics are the #1 seed in the East (for the second year in a row), without their co-offensive anchor, reliant on a bunch of young'ns to contribute at a high level; greater stability (again), greater depth (again) and we can actually visibly see they're heading in the right direction.
I'm not even going to argue against the Bucks and Knicks - shyt should be self-explanatory. It seems to me you're just going to unload every [empty] clip you have on Ainge/Celtics until you have nothing left.
Hell no they notPistons are so much more fun to watch without Reggie Jackson
He definitely dont have the hops. The explosiveness is there, but sporadically.
Drummond is really good. I had no clue. He's like way better than Deandre.
Pistons are so much more fun to watch without Reggie Jackson
Hell no they not
And is Portland D always this terrible?
SVG has had too many opportunities to dump Reggie to take him seriously regarding Detroit's PG situationPistons are so much more fun to watch without Reggie Jackson
I don't watch Pistons play