The Pacers and Thunder have the same records
Kevin Prichard looking like a genius
The Pacers and Thunder have the same records
I wonder what his market value is going to be like in the summer after this horrible season he's had
They have so many role players locked up to horrible contracts
@jwinfieldNo rest for the weary when it comes to Steven Soderbergh’s 2018. In between all of his media consumption, the director’s app-turned-TV show Mosiac is now airing on HBO and in just a few weeks he’ll premiere his iPhone-shot psychological horror film Unsane at Berlinale. Then he’s back to New York City to shoot a new film, and more details on the project have now been revealed.
Set to begin production at the end of the month, the NBA drama High Flying Bird will be led by his break-out star of The Knick, André Holland. It will also mark another reunion for Holland as the script is written by Tarell Alvin McCraney, the Oscar-winning co-writer of Moonlight. While the project was initially revealed last fall, we now know more about the drama thanks to this logline: “During an NBA lockout, a sports agent, Dean (Holland), presents his rookie client, Erick Scott, with an intriguing and controversial business opportunity.”
With the shoot lasting only a little over two weeks and Soderbergh’s recent comments about how iPhones are the future of filmmaking, one would imagine he’ll utilize the smartphone for this yet again. As we await word on additional casting, Soderbergh also just lined up another project with the action thriller Planet Kill. Producing with an eye to direct, the undisclosed story comes from Scott Z. Burns (Contagion) and James Greer (Unsane), Deadline reports. Soderbergh truly never left, but as Logan Lucky proved, it’s a welcome sight to have him taking on a plethora of feature films once again.
this the only way Boston can pull off a deal with NOKnowing what we know about Cousins, should the Pelicans sale?
If I'm Ainge, I get on the phone with Demps and try to talk him into giving me Davis for Tatum and Brown and one of those picks that I think they have.
There ain't a player in the league more disrespected by the refs than Jrue. Never seen a player who drives with the frequency he has been this season average less than 3 FT attempts a game, straight up criminal. He'd be averaging just as much if not more PPG than guys like Oladipo and Lillard if he got half the calls they did.
Or Dinwiddie.That would be D. Rose
Or Dinwiddie.
The entire point of me layering an alternative outcome of Embiid being out of the picture is to show you the 76ers would have considerably less foundation to work with (as opposed to Celtics being without theirs), to point out how all their eggs are in a one [broken] basket. After all, aren't we talking about the future of their 76ers as a whole? The 76ers are completely reliant upon Embiid staying healthy and turning into a superstar (else they're essentially going back to square one), the Celtics are not reliant on ONE player, which is why I don't see your logic in how "long term the Sixers & Bucks will put a rain on their parade".
It simply doesn't make any sense.
Greater coaching, greater top-end talent*, better FO, better environment, provability, and visible success is all in the Celtics' favor - that's what long-term success is built on, and remains, regardless of what misfortune a franchise finds themselves dealing with.
And I don't know why you're talking about "best case scenario" when you haven't applied it to the Celtics, in the same manner.
He really doesn't.
I'd be inclined to agree with you if his surroundings were equal to that of Boston's, but they're not. If you want to argue that Philly has more potential because they have the best player, I most certainly wouldn't argue against that, but that's not what we're discussing here. Embiid may give Philly a higher ceiling as their teams now stand, but Boston's ceiling is much more assured than theirs.
For you to suggest that Philly (and the Bucks) are going to "rain on the parade" of Celtics in the long-term, is basically you saying Embiid's going to have a long, healthy career with little-to-no setbacks, Fultz will come back from his shoulder and yips and be a star piece, Simmons will continue to progress, behind a strong FO and top-end coaching that'll put the necessary pieces around them to succeed. All the while, Kyrie's prime is cut short and/or gets injured, Tatum and/or Brown fail to get any better or leave for greener pastures, Hayward's play regresses or becomes a non-factor, Stevens' ability to coach is swallowed by a black hole of amnesia and the Celtics org. fail to put the proper pieces around or fail to sign any stars in the future.
You're basically suggesting everything will go right for the 76ers, and nothing will go right for the Celtics. Which not only goes against any sense of pragmaticism, but it goes against the very state both teams are in at the moment.
Yes, I'm well aware of this, which again, it doesn't matter where it falls because they can still use it as a package for a big man, if it doesn't fall to them in this year's draft. It's still a valuable asset, regardless. In fact, it's actually more valuable for a team looking to rebuild in 2019, because they'll receive the more favourable pick from Philly/Sac, with only a 1st-pick protection.
More like, more drivel drivel, oh my bad, I meant more dribble dribble.
this the only way Boston can pull off a deal with NO
their best first rounder
Tatum
Brown
Smart
Baynes
Morris
but here's the problem: to trade Davis, you might as well let Cousins go (because no one's gonna give them anything for Cousins right now) and you're basically telling your fans you're in the playoffs as of today but don't want to be. That might make the trade twice as dispiriting for their fans.