Rich Spirit
#LeveledUp
Rockets got 33 pts and its in the 3rd quarter data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="deadmanny :deadmanny: :deadmanny:"
Yes they areWarriors still gonna beat the Bulls record?:smugklay:
Aint it kinda misleading though. The efficiency is pure math, it doesn't account for game situation.
If Warriors are down 1 with no time left, shooting a 100% guaranteed 2-pt shot is more efficient than shooting 67% 3-pt shot from 28-50 feet out.
Unless I'm not getting it.![]()
This is why "analytics" can be
I wonder how much math he did to find a distance range + a number of shots to actually get to that 52 number...which is almost the perfect efficiency number for the number of makes...
You're catching feelings over someone being exposed for using analytics in a misleading and inprecise way but we're sensitive?
He's implying that Steph Curry is so good at shooting 3 that he could be more efficient than a guy shooting 2's even if that guy made all his 2's...which is fukking stupid...because after a certain number he wouldn't be...:yeahok:
Oh my bad...your not mad about that...your mad cause you posted some dumb ass steph curry analytical twitter BS and you thought it was going to get you a bunch of daps but instead you had posters tell you how stupid such a post was...probably because you yourself don't even know how to interpret the numbers :yeahok:
My bad breh...tell you what the next time you post some foolishness like this i well just ignore it...scouts honor :grippingafrancis: