Rajon Rondo leading these misfits to Playoff position *free Daps and reps*

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,568
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,490
No... your citing a 15 game sample size, and assuming that head case wouldn't have went off the deep end
This is why I can tell you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. Malone is the only coach who could keep him under control. They had the 7th best offense in the league prior to Boogie getting sick, better in almost every offensive category compared to their offense this season.
 

Ethnic Cleansing

Fucc Slobks and Crabks
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,383
Reputation
2,427
Daps
23,414
This is why I can tell you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. Malone is the only coach who could keep him under control. They had the 7th best offense in the league prior to Boogie getting sick, better in almost every offensive category compared to their offense this season.
:stopitslime:They have the 4th highest PPG this year
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,568
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,490
:stopitslime:They have the 4th highest PPG this year
Yeah I think it's time for you to take a L. You don't go by points per game - it doesn't take take into account pace and shooting percentage. Offensive rating is the best measure. They only have the 11th best offensive rating this season. They play at the fastest pace, that's why they have such a high PPG.
 

Ethnic Cleansing

Fucc Slobks and Crabks
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,383
Reputation
2,427
Daps
23,414
Yeah I think it's time for you to take a L. You don't go by points per game - it doesn't take take into account pace and shooting percentage. Offensive rating is the best measure. They only have the 11th best offensive rating this season. They play at the fastest pace, that's why they have such a high PPG.
Once again I was sidestepping your analytics, Phil Jackson style :takedat:


Honest question, what makes your analytics so sacred?
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,568
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,490
Once again I was sidestepping your analytics, Phil Jackson style :takedat:


Honest question, what makes your analytics so sacred?
They are #s showing you his direct impact on the court. They are not my opinion, they are facts. You're spewing your opinion all over this thread.
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,743
Reputation
-982
Daps
5,349
ARE YOU STUPID OR SOMETHING?

That means his positive impact is non existent. Look at all the other PGs who have a direct influence on their team's shooting percentage when they're on the court. You say he's leading this team to playoff position but it's not having impact on the court. Again let me reiterate -

Kings are 10.8 points BETTER with Boogie on court (per 100 possessions)
Kings are 3.3 points WORSE with Rondo on court (per 100 possessions)
Kings have better shooting percentage - hell why don't we call it identical (since there's a .1 difference) - when he's off the court
He has the second worst scoring per touch amongst all starting PGs (equal with Rubio)

Can you dispute those FACTS, with anything that shows his impact on the team?


How many points do the Kings allow when each player is on the court as opposed to otherwise? Also, is there a synergistic effect with both players on the floor?

In addition when a player starts out the game they may withstand the other teams starters to the tune of -5 pets however at the end of the game in crunch time they may put up a +6.
 

Ethnic Cleansing

Fucc Slobks and Crabks
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,383
Reputation
2,427
Daps
23,414
They are #s showing you his direct impact on the court. They are not my opinion, they are facts. You're spewing your opinion all over this thread.
Opinion :jbhmm:


Why have you dodged the Phil Jackson "opinion" I and others have mentioned at least 6 times yet keep propping up analytics.

You remind me of a devout Atheist who pull out the :merchant: when asked to explain spirits, ghost and other phenomena :pachaha:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,568
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,490
Opinion :jbhmm:


Why have you dodged the Phil Jackson "opinion" I and others have mentioned at least 6 times yet keep propping up analytics.

You remind me of a devout Atheist who pull out the :merchant: when asked to explain spirits, ghost and other phenomena :pachaha:
What the fukk does that have to do with anything? Porzingis was a high risk/high reward pick. It's funny too since a lot of the main "analytics" guys were hyping up Porzingis well before his draft stock increased during team workouts. Oh and you want an example of Jackson making a full of himself -



The four teams that have taken the most 3-pters in the post season -

InfyPPU.png


The four teams that took the most 3-pters during the regular season -

zKGclgh.png


Phil Jackson lost. :mjcry:
 

Ethnic Cleansing

Fucc Slobks and Crabks
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,383
Reputation
2,427
Daps
23,414
What the fukk does that have to do with anything? Porzingis was a high risk/high reward pick. It's funny too since a lot of the main "analytics" guys were hyping up Porzingis well before his draft stock increased during team workouts. Oh and you want an example of Jackson making a full of himself -


I never mentioned Porzingis, but cool.. 1 year sample size is recognized as championing a philosophy, not toentire the only thing those teams have in common is 3's... Your fukkboy analytics account for way more than that. 10 more championships (to match Phil) from the top analytic squad and I'll shut my mouth and get a Gil Scott-Heroin tattoo on my forehead :scust:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,568
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,490
How many points do the Kings allow when each player is on the court as opposed to otherwise? Also, is there a synergistic effect with both players on the floor?
-4.4 offensive rating differential own team and opposition (Rudy)
+11.4 offensive rating differential own team and opposition (Cousins)
+13.2 offensive rating differential own team and opposition (Casspi)
-8.1 offensive rating differential own and opposition (Belinelli)

There's only a synergistic effect in that Rondo needs Cousins to survive, not the other way around. Rondo being a non-scoring threat actually hinders Cousins' game and offensive efficiency - i) Cousins is forced to carry too much of the scoring load ii) Rondo's man gives him more of a shooting cushion to stay closer to Cousins or a teammate. That's not to say Rondo doesn't give him good looks or easy baskets throughout the game (I mean if you handle the ball more than anyone else, you're going to get players good looks from time to time), it's just saying overall his playing style is a detriment to not only Cousin's offense but also the Kings'.
In addition when a player starts out the game they may withstand the other teams starters to the tune of -5 pets however at the end of the game in crunch time they may put up a +6.
There's a lot of noise and EaF in on/off court numbers, but the top players that actually have an impact on the game always have not only positive ratings but also they separate themselves from the rest of the league. Rondo's has POOR on/off numbers and dominates the ball while leading poor offensive-rated teams (in Sac, Dallas and Boston - there's a trend here - not an anomaly) when he's heralded as this player who makes his teammates better. It couldn't be more further from the truth. His style hurts his team - it doesn't make them better. He's carried by good/great offensive players, and when they don't play (Cousins missing games this season) his ineffectiveness rears its ugly head again.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,568
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,490
I never mentioned Porzingis, but cool.. 1 year sample size is recognized as championing a philosophy, not toentire the only thing those teams have in common is 3's... Your fukkboy analytics account for way more than that. 10 more championships (to match Phil) from the top analytic squad and I'll shut my mouth and get a Gil Scott-Heroin tattoo on my forehead :scust:
Do you even know what analytics is? I bet you're one of those simple muhfukkas who thinks it's just about shooting 3s. :lolbron:
 
Top