Rajon Rondo leading these misfits to Playoff position *free Daps and reps*

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
22,300
Reputation
3,880
Daps
94,873
Y'all still falling for the facade of Rondo having a positive impact on the court. Celtics played better with Evan Turner running the offense after he got shipped out:mjlol:

Thank god Ainge was able to get Crowder for him :wow:
 

Ethnic Cleansing

Fucc Slobks and Crabks
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
5,383
Reputation
2,427
Daps
23,412
Y'all still falling for the facade of Rondo having a positive impact on the court. Celtics played better with Evan Turner running the offense after he got shipped out:mjlol:

Thank god Ainge was able to get Crowder for him :wow:
Turner/Isiah Thomas were a more ideal fit for that college operation Stevens was running down there :lolbron:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,561
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,488
You highlighted a .01 differential and want to be taken serious :stopitslime:... Either way I showed u the improvement from last year to this year that would be more indicative of his impact than the 10 minutes he's not on the court. Your comparing it to nothing
ARE YOU STUPID OR SOMETHING?

That means his positive impact is non existent. Look at all the other PGs who have a direct influence on their team's shooting percentage when they're on the court. You say he's leading this team to playoff position but it's not having impact on the court. Again let me reiterate -

Kings are 10.8 points BETTER with Boogie on court (per 100 possessions)
Kings are 3.3 points WORSE with Rondo on court (per 100 possessions)
Kings have better shooting percentage - hell why don't we call it identical (since there's a .1 difference) - when he's off the court
He has the second worst scoring per touch amongst all starting PGs (equal with Rubio)

Can you dispute those FACTS, with anything that shows his impact on the team?
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,692
Reputation
11,197
Daps
197,458
Reppin
Lamb of God
:mindblown:

I'm giving you stats when he's on the court and off the court - you know what he's directly influencing the play. You reply with #s for the ENTIRE team (regardless if he's on the court or not) - how stupid are you? They have worse shooting percentage and offensive rating when he's ON the court - what part of that don't you, @Originalgangsta317 and @hayesc0 understand?

:heh:
Watch the games, his on/off might be telling but what it doesn't account for is how he makes everyone around him more accountable. It's the Bibby effect is what I call it where the player has more impact on the team than the actual game it's self. Usually happens with genius PG's like Bibby and Rondo.
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,692
Reputation
11,197
Daps
197,458
Reppin
Lamb of God
ARE YOU STUPID OR SOMETHING?

That means his positive impact is non existent. Look at all the other PGs who have a direct influence on their team's shooting percentage when they're on the court. You say he's leading this team to playoff position but it's not having impact on the court. Again let me reiterate -

Kings are 10.8 points BETTER with Boogie on court (per 100 possessions)
Kings are 3.3 points WORSE with Rondo on court (per 100 possessions)
Kings have better shooting percentage - hell why don't we call it identical (since there's a .1 difference) - when he's off the court
He has the second worst scoring per touch amongst all starting PGs (equal with Rubio)

Can you dispute those FACTS, with anything that shows his impact on the team?
Boogie is the 1st option, of course he matters. To say otherwise is a lie but without Rondo, this is a lottery team.
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,692
Reputation
11,197
Daps
197,458
Reppin
Lamb of God
Phil Jackson won 11 titles rejecting analytics. I tend to favor in the ideals of Phil Jackson than Gil Scott-Heroin (terrible name btw) :yeshrug:
Phil took Porzingis who adv analytics wasn't great and passed on someone like Winslow who had great analytics for his age. It's clear Phil make the right decision.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,561
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,488
The biggest crock of shyt statement ever, you gonna learn to respect Rondo one of these days.
Nah it's not - it's the truth. Nobody has more empty stats than he does. Every season he took more control of the Celtics offense - the worse they got, and the worse his on/off court numbers got too. They had a better record when he wasn't playing and a better offensive rating when he wasn't playing either - therefore you can't the excuse of PP and KG aging and/or Celtics supporting personnel as reasoning. His style isn't conducive to winning basketball. It's been proven time and time again.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,561
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,488
Watch the games.
:merchant:
]his on/off might be telling but what it doesn't account for is how he makes everyone around him more accountable.
:laff:

I've never heard so much bullshyt in my life. The offenses in Boston were better with him off the court. The offense in Dallas were better with him off the court. The offense in Sacramento are better than him off the court. I do NOT give a fukk what parameters you wanna put up to show this abstract Rondo impact he has on the team but it doesn't bode well with reality.
It's the Bibby effect is what I call it where the player has more impact on the team than the actual game it's self. Usually happens with genius PG's like Bibby and Rondo.
:laff:

Yeah that sure worked out in Dallas last season.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,561
Reputation
8,723
Daps
225,488
Phil Jackson won 11 titles rejecting analytics. I tend to favor in the ideals of a proven wimner (Phil Jackson) than Gil Scott-Heroin (terrible name btw) :yeshrug:

Phil took Porzingis who adv analytics wasn't great and passed on someone like Winslow who had great analytics for his age. It's clear Phil make the right decision.
Lord have mercy :snoop:
 
Top