You do realize that he wouldn't need to do this if he looked to score right (and was capable of scoring at a high clip)? If he commanded defensive attention, his players would get open naturally. There's times he literally stands in one spot (while his defender gives him a shooting cushion and helps on another man), and he's telling his players to move around - either wasting time on the clock or/and leaving his teammates to try and get open on a 4v5 situation. As opposed to a PG like Curry, Westbrook, CP etc etc who attract defensive attention and give their players more space to work and less defenders to score against, by just being a threat to score - defenders play them closer, attract help defenders, create matchup advantages and give the offense another point of scoring difference.
Let me ask you - is an offense going to be more efficient and fluid with the main ball-handler as a playmaker or as a playmaker/scorer? What would be easier for defenses to defend? A guy just looking to pass all game or a guy who is an equal threat to pass and score at any given time? Which of those players would cause more chaos on the opposition's defense?
The stats (and common sense) are almost completely in favor of ONE of these types - the question is which one do you think it is?
but rightfully so, I've never seen someone on here go in on a NBA player this long