Essential Quick Lil Gems on Dealing with Women

[Turbulent]

How is promiscuity as a single as betrayel duri g a relationship?


You are mixing up personal preferences and a double standard on a social level.

well i'd rather have a woman with a low number/0 previous partners and that's my personal preference.

if you're saying that they are allowed to have their own preference and when i have my own then it's a social double standard, wouldn't that in itself be a new double standard you are trying to establish? If you don't care about this, cool, more power to you. the opposite is just more attractive to me. Yes, if people did less slut shaming (and like we both agreed, women judge on this way more than men and i actually know why they do it to eachother, hint, it's the same reason men judge simps...) then yeah, some men would be getting laid more. But the flipside is that I have to choose a wife out of that bunch after that. Yeah we all want to bang them. but we don't want to wife them. So do women win in the end? no. Do men win in the end? depends how you see it.

 

[Turbulent]

"Once a good girl has gone bad, she's gone forever..."

you can turn a good girl into a hoe but you can't un-hoe a hoe into a good girl.

 

[CrossBones]

diamonds are a girls best friend. because, of course, "diamonds are forever" and their value will always be high. so even when you want to leave or the relationship is over, she will still seek to get some kind of monetary benefit from it. dont doubt that she may be thinking on that level, especially after youve been with her for some time

they all know that their looks fade and their market value decreases every year, so in turn they will want the diamonds whenever they can get it.

my girl cousin played this song while I was in the car with her earlier this week, and I was like "no shyt." its true, and I dont know why I didnt look at it in such a way before. but, here it is if you didnt quite see it so plainly


A kiss on the hand may be, quite continental,
But diamonds are a girl's best friend
A kiss may be grand but it, won't pay the rental on your humble flat
Or help you feed your, p*ssy cat

Men grow cold as, girl's grow old
And we all lose our charms in the end
But square cut or pear shaped
These rocks don't lose, their shape


I posted this because, you know, that grand ole hustle of showing her you care is to get her a diamond. its forever even if youre not. its a move by a woman to make sure that you give her something that is going to have some monetary value after you leave her (cough cough alimony, child support which a lot of times go straight to her pocket and not your seed, etc etc), meaning this way of thinking is nothing new brehs. be careful about some of their cunning ways, if you dont see it sometimes.

 

[Odyssey]

I find it funny how we have a 921 page thread and yet no mention of our glorious forefathers who teach us the exalted truth, justice, honor, and poetic spirit of manhood. You have become just like the feminists in that you make no mention of

HOMER

NOR MOSES

NOR JESUS

NOR SOCRATES

NOR MISES

NOR VIRGIL

NOR DANTE

NOR JEFFERSON

NOR HAYEK

NOR ADAM SMITH

NOR JOSEPH CAMPBELL

NOR ACHILLES

NOR ODYSSEY

NOR LEONIDAS

NOR DAVID

NOR SODOM

NOR NOAH

NOR WHITMAN

NOR SHAKESPEARE

NOR THE BIBLE

NOR ANY OF THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

NOR THE FALL OF EVE WHICH LAUNCHED THE BIBLE NOR THE ADULTERY OF HELEN WHICH CAUSED THE TROJAN WAR

AS IF

HOMER, MOSES, JESUS, SOCRATES, JEFFERSON, ADAMS, MADISON, WASHINGTON, LEONIDAS, NEWTON

KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OF BEING A MAN

AS IF ACHILLES KNOWS NOTHING OF HONOR

How many more books are going to be written about men and for men WHICH IGNORE THE CLASSICAL GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

When i find out that these books and posts make no mention of the GREAT BOOKS or the classical heroes which the neocons hate as they exalt tucker max rhymes with Goldman Sachs neocon fiat buttsex sessions that they exalt in the weekly standard

I EXALT THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

WHICH HAVE BEEN BANNED AND BANISHED

AND WHICH WOMEN CARE NOT FOR

AS THEY HAVE NEVER READ, NOR TALK ABOUT, NOR WRITE ABOUT

THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

WHICH EXALT THE ARCHETYPICAL PINNACLES OF HEROIC MANHOOD

 

[My neck and my back]

How is promiscuity as a single as betrayel duri g a relationship?.

because according to you women having sex out of fun is meaningless...so if your woman was to fukk another guy it's a minor issue you can get over, right?

 

[MAKAVELI25]

I find it funny how we have a 921 page thread and yet no mention of our glorious forefathers who teach us the exalted truth, justice, honor, and poetic spirit of manhood. You have become just like the feminists in that you make no mention of

HOMER

NOR MOSES

NOR JESUS

NOR SOCRATES

NOR MISES

NOR VIRGIL

NOR DANTE

NOR JEFFERSON

NOR HAYEK

NOR ADAM SMITH

NOR JOSEPH CAMPBELL

NOR ACHILLES

NOR ODYSSEY

NOR LEONIDAS

NOR DAVID

NOR SODOM

NOR NOAH

NOR WHITMAN

NOR SHAKESPEARE

NOR THE BIBLE

NOR ANY OF THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

NOR THE FALL OF EVE WHICH LAUNCHED THE BIBLE NOR THE ADULTERY OF HELEN WHICH CAUSED THE TROJAN WAR

AS IF

HOMER, MOSES, JESUS, SOCRATES, JEFFERSON, ADAMS, MADISON, WASHINGTON, LEONIDAS, NEWTON

KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OF BEING A MAN

AS IF ACHILLES KNOWS NOTHING OF HONOR

How many more books are going to be written about men and for men WHICH IGNORE THE CLASSICAL GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

When i find out that these books and posts make no mention of the GREAT BOOKS or the classical heroes which the neocons hate as they exalt tucker max rhymes with Goldman Sachs neocon fiat buttsex sessions that they exalt in the weekly standard

I EXALT THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

WHICH HAVE BEEN BANNED AND BANISHED

AND WHICH WOMEN CARE NOT FOR

AS THEY HAVE NEVER READ, NOR TALK ABOUT, NOR WRITE ABOUT

THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

WHICH EXALT THE ARCHETYPICAL PINNACLES OF HEROIC MANHOOD

cool story, breh, have a seat now

 

[Sinnerman]

I'm always misreading signs of interest

 

[Turbulent]

diamonds are a girls best friend. because, of course, "diamonds are forever" and their value will always be high. so even when you want to leave or the relationship is over, she will still seek to get some kind of monetary benefit from it. dont doubt that she may be thinking on that level, especially after youve been with her for some time

they all know that their looks fade and their market value decreases every year, so in turn they will want the diamonds whenever they can get it.

my girl cousin played this song while I was in the car with her earlier this week, and I was like "no shyt." its true, and I dont know why I didnt look at it in such a way before. but, here it is if you didnt quite see it so plainly


A kiss on the hand may be, quite continental,
But diamonds are a girl's best friend
A kiss may be grand but it, won't pay the rental on your humble flat
Or help you feed your, p*ssy cat

Men grow cold as, girl's grow old
And we all lose our charms in the end
But square cut or pear shaped
These rocks don't lose, their shape


I posted this because, you know, that grand ole hustle of showing her you care is to get her a diamond. its forever even if youre not. its a move by a woman to make sure that you give her something that is going to have some monetary value after you leave her (cough cough alimony, child support which a lot of times go straight to her pocket and not your seed, etc etc), meaning this way of thinking is nothing new brehs. be careful about some of their cunning ways, if you dont see it sometimes.

never really paid attention to the lyrics like that

 

[KyokushinKarateMan]

Want a woman at school, work, etc to notice you and potentially become more interested in you? Let her see you with other women. I don't mean flirtaciously, giving her the impression you are trying to sex up everything in sight, but just walking from one class to another with a female friend, or sharing space at work with a female; or other typical casual instances of male female companionship -and it generally only works if these females you are hanging with look as good as, or better than, the one you're trying to get to notice you. I have experienced this phenomenon on countless occasions. I cross paths daily with a female, she never really notices me, or anyone else for that matter, then I walk by her with a sexy female friend or one of my sisters and she's staring a hole through me as we pass..and everyday afterwards. It's a woman's nature, to want what she thinks is 'unavailable', women instinctively gravitate to men who appear to be taken or appear to be highly sought after and could be snatched up at any moment; and lastly it gives them a natural sense of security, seeing you with other women. They realize hmm if that pretty girl doesn't mind being around him then yeah, he must be awesome, or something to that effect. I've experienced this in enough different contexts and circumstances to know that it is true and I advise anyone needing to, to take these tactics into consideration. Stop brushing off your sexy female friends just because they have boyfriends and you know you're not going to get any; they are indeed magnets for other sexy females.

 

[Turbulent]

I find it funny how we have a 921 page thread and yet no mention of our glorious forefathers who teach us the exalted truth, justice, honor, and poetic spirit of manhood. You have become just like the feminists in that you make no mention of

HOMER

NOR MOSES

NOR JESUS

NOR SOCRATES

NOR MISES

NOR VIRGIL

NOR DANTE

NOR JEFFERSON

NOR HAYEK

NOR ADAM SMITH

NOR JOSEPH CAMPBELL

NOR ACHILLES

NOR ODYSSEY

NOR LEONIDAS

NOR DAVID

NOR SODOM

NOR NOAH

NOR WHITMAN

NOR SHAKESPEARE

NOR THE BIBLE

NOR ANY OF THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

NOR THE FALL OF EVE WHICH LAUNCHED THE BIBLE NOR THE ADULTERY OF HELEN WHICH CAUSED THE TROJAN WAR

AS IF

HOMER, MOSES, JESUS, SOCRATES, JEFFERSON, ADAMS, MADISON, WASHINGTON, LEONIDAS, NEWTON

KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OF BEING A MAN

AS IF ACHILLES KNOWS NOTHING OF HONOR

How many more books are going to be written about men and for men WHICH IGNORE THE CLASSICAL GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

When i find out that these books and posts make no mention of the GREAT BOOKS or the classical heroes which the neocons hate as they exalt tucker max rhymes with Goldman Sachs neocon fiat buttsex sessions that they exalt in the weekly standard

I EXALT THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

WHICH HAVE BEEN BANNED AND BANISHED

AND WHICH WOMEN CARE NOT FOR

AS THEY HAVE NEVER READ, NOR TALK ABOUT, NOR WRITE ABOUT

THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

WHICH EXALT THE ARCHETYPICAL PINNACLES OF HEROIC MANHOOD

actually The bible has been referenced many times in this thread. We've talked about Jesus, Samson, Abraham, Joseph, Adam and Eve, etc.

I've also talked about Ovid classic "The Art of Love" which basically breaks down the game and the nature of females.

 

[MikelArteta]

Want a woman at school, work, etc to notice you and potentially become more interested in you? Let her see you with other women. I don't mean flirtaciously, giving her the impression you are trying to sex up everything in sight, but just walking from one class to another with a female friend, or sharing space at work with a female; or other typical casual instances of male female companionship -and it generally only works if these females you are hanging with look as good as, or better than, the one you're trying to get to notice you. I have experienced this phenomenon on countless occasions. I cross paths daily with a female, she never really notices me, or anyone else for that matter, then I walk by her with a sexy female friend or one of my sisters and she's staring a hole through me as we pass..and everyday afterwards. It's a woman's nature, to want what she thinks is 'unavailable', women instinctively gravitate to men who appear to be taken or appear to be highly sought after and could be snatched up at any moment; and lastly it gives them a natural sense of security, seeing you with other women. They realize hmm if that pretty girl doesn't mind being around him then yeah, he must be awesome, or something to that effect. I've experienced this in enough different contexts and circumstances to know that it is true and I advise anyone needing to, to take these tactics into consideration. Stop brushing off your sexy female friends just because they have boyfriends and you know you're not going to get any; they are indeed magnets for other sexy females.

youve been validated, other women who are hotter than her have said you are ok.

 

[MikelArteta]

guys please take 15 min out of your life and watch this

and also buy the book

 

[MikelArteta]

ive been on a relationship sabbatical for the past two years and now even just dating or chill sessions or even pursuing :woah:


it really is incredible how exhausting dating/trying to date/looking for a new date/maintaining a relationship with the completely wrong person is.

 

[sixsixtwo]

ive been on a relationship sabbatical for the past two years and now even just dating or chill sessions or even pursuing :woah:


it really is incredible how exhausting dating/trying to date/looking for a new date/maintaining a relationship with the completely wrong person is.

About the Helen Smith book, I've been meaning to ask you -- have you completed reading it?

If so, give a critique/review of it.. A few weeks ago, MarkyMark wrote a 3 part review on the book..

 

[sixsixtwo]

The female libido and ‘the two-year itch’ - Bookmarked, Books - Macleans.ca

"Isabel, a New York City lawyer, has a fiancé who appears a perfect catch. Eric is sensitive, smart, kind and handsome. He’s an attentive lover, the sort of man who, on Valentine’s Day, draws her a bath surrounded by candles and arranges rose petals into a heart shape on the bed. Isabel loves Eric, even though her passion for him dwindled months after they became involved. She misses her erotically charged relationship with her ex-boyfriend who, though not marriage material, made her feel desired, his “possession.” Still, Isabel tries to rev up her low libido for sex with Eric, buying massage oil and a blindfold—which also lets her pretend she’s with someone else."

"American psychologist Marta Meana routinely sees women whose white-hot lust for their partner has turned to ash. She theorizes that, within monogamy, women’s narcissistic need to feel desired is not being met: they feel their partners are trapped and that “a choice—the lust-propelled selection of her—was no longer being made.” One of the women interviewed in In What Do Woman Want?, Sophie, reveals how she compensates to summon lust for her husband: by fantasizing about being ravaged by Yankee shortstop Derek Jeter."