they aint even the best ones they gotThem Lockheed weapons too strong
they aint even the best ones they gotThem Lockheed weapons too strong
yep, everybody knows we would win, the question is are we willing to sacrifice the east and west coast or other major metro areas to do it.USA would smoke Russia with or without nukes. But it would come at a heavy price for humanity
It's a nightmare scenario which none of us should want. Picture WW 1 +2 but far worse. Only idiots who don't understand history and the implications of world war in the 21st century would want a war between USA and Russia.
This is legit why Biden and NATO asked him not to do thisHe messed up greatly. Before the world respected him as a boogie man. When the lights got cut on, he was exposed as a delusional old man.
Biden out here cooking Putin with his JV squad weaponsChina looking at Putin getting that work by little ass ragtag Ukraine using American weaponry and thinking that maybe China can coexist with Taiwan. Please .
He has an off ramp, he could just leave and start the process of negotiations to be reintroduced into the global economy again, But that would humiliate putin.Give Vlad an off ramp. It's think it's stupid and dangerous to corner a rat when the rat has nukes.
Putin's been president for 20 years and only stepped down to become prime minister for a stopwatch second.A support for Ukraine is a support for the establishment.
You don't get to threaten nikkas cause you're losing the war.It’s all fun and games till he let one of them thangs go.
You establishment parrot. Try thinking for yourself for once. I’ve never seen you have an original political thought. Not once.
Being an edgy contrarian is the TLR way when it comes to politics.
Ukraine gets invaded by an aggressor and this is your response. Laughable.
I'm not even sure Russia has the equipment for an additional 300k troops at this point, especially with winter coming. The bigger problem is with Ukraine currently re-enforcing the areas they recently liberated, they've been able to move their forces up...including HIMAR and artillery. These Russian soldiers, who are not trained, will be blown to bits if they plan on invading beyond the annexed territory. I don't see how this turns the tides for Putin and instead may open him up for criticism (or worse) within Moscow. A Russian hardliner would be able to ask why they didn't fully mobilize for instance, and claim a partial mobilization is why this failed.
Russia lost more troops in 6 months than the US did in Vietnam.most people don't know Russia have only used 1% of their military this whole time before the mobilization. The whole SMO was them mostly doing a proxy war giving aid and support to Militias and Deployed Mercenaries like the chechens and Wagnar taking the brunt. The only time they really used their active service was in the very beginning of the war. Im not tryna cape for them just letting you know
its kinda wild because no one can turn on him without being swept up in an eventual purge.Bout time to Putin out the paint
ehhhhlearn nothing from watching the US struggle in proxy wars for 70 years, breh's
A speech putin himself gave is "not the most accurate" nowNot trying to be that guy but please acknowledge that the information most readily available may not be the most accurate.