No, you should Melo probably trade RIGHT NOW when he's coming off a very good season. He's a steadily declining asset as evidenced by his FG%, 3P%, FTA, and scoring averages have all dipped gradually these past three years. Look at the players like Melo who didn't heavily rely on their athleticism at the tail end of their careers.
Pierce's numbers from age 33-35 (this is probably best case for Melo)
Joe Johnson from age 33-35
Both players got traded at different points of their respective careers, and Celtics and Hawks have reaped the benefits of those deals. ATL looks like they're gonna contend for another Eastern Conference finals appearance and Boston traded away two aging stars (who actually helped their team win a NBA championship) for most likely top 5 lottery picks.
it's just an assumption that keeping Melo buys you more time to develop and evaluate KP before you put the strain of being the focus of defenses and the face of the franchise on him. It's not assuming Melo never regresses, just assuming that for the time being, Melo is better prepared to handle that.
These are fair points.
I totally agree that we shouldn't mortgage our future unless it's gonna give us strong odds at being contenders; but there's an NTC involved here and KP's development might actually be helped by not rushing him before he's physically ready to carry the load for a franchise. If Melo will waive his NTC and we can get some real future building blocks, I'm with it; but if we brought in a quality coach I'm not opposed to another year seeing what the Melo/KP/RoLo frontcourt does with an upgraded backcourt (all in on the Bazemore/Crabbe/Fournier bandwagon here whether we move Melo or not)
He got booed mercilessly at Barclays Center during draft night, but he has handled media and fan scrutiny with great aplomb. KP doesn't need to "physically carry the load of a franchise", because there will be zero expectations for this team to do anything of significance if Melo is off the team. Carmelo has three years left on his deal. Cleveland, Boston, Indiana, Toronto, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Detroit, Miami, and Charlotte are all much better equipped to have any type of sustained success during that time, because they have better front offices, ownership and/or younger rosters than New York does as currently constructed do. No first round draft pick because of the Bargnani trade.
Durant and second tier free agents like Derozan, Horford and Batum aren't going to sign with the Knicks, either. The only assets are the current roster Melo, KP and maybe Grant??? This team isn't gonna be good next year as well even if they added younger wings/guards like Clarkson, Crabbe and Fournier and a proven NBA coach. I'd rather be at the position of bottoming out this year when the team actually has their first round picks moving forward in a stronger draft class and cap space to maneuver around in a much better class for guards/wings in the 2017 free agency class than the Knicks thread in mediocrity at around .500 next year with very little to no cap space at all, and mid-round picks.