So is it fair to say that you were not talking about black and brown children when you wrote about, "certain demographics" and you don't think the police has any reason to have prejudice against black and brown children, but only certain unrevealed demographics?
and when you wrote about "certain demographics", in a thread about how police view "black children", you did this because?
No. Like many of the other issues brought up on this board it an economic issue as much or more than it is a race issue.IMO
I think the evidence shows(pretty clearly) that crime is more prevalent in poor economic conditions, so law enforcement focusing their attention on these areas seems logical... to me at least.
Again I don't think its racial, but rather a characteristic of youths raised in poor economic conditions.
These youths, while innocent(ill concede that) pose adult threats, and are often far more volatile than adults...
My argument is in the approach of law enforcement itself. If crime is more prevalent in low income areas, is paying extra attention to those areas really that unfathomable or discriminatory?
@acri1 was absolutely correct that this approach creates highly inequitable numbers that further strengthen the approach(and bias) of law enforcement... but is the approach wrong(fundamentally flawed)? and if so how?
You contend these practices are based solely on race?
if so, could you explain how the same targeting of poor neighborhoods takes place around the globe in regions where race is not an issue?If its
I think there may be a little more to it than whites hating blacks... as taboo as that is to say.
The only constant in all instances of this "discrimination" is the socioeconomic condition of the victims...
You're making it into a black vs white issue, when i'm suggesting that its more than that... c00ning as you guys say.
The demographic I was referring to was "the poor", not blacks. Though i'm beginning to realize they are synonymous here on HL.