Look at this y’all
Now it doesn’t matter again
Sony stans
Do you ask Sony that when they continue to add ps1,2, and 3 games to PSNOW?Who the fukk wants to play ps1 demo discs anyways?
the fact the xbots dont even keep their previous trash can systems, that they bought 3-4 times over their lifespans, due to them being poorly manufactured but be so gun ho about being able to play them old games on their newer trashboxesWho are you?
I Got a OG PS3 Backwards Compatible Spiderman original Release, 1 terabyte SSD Soft Mod installed, Equipped with a cooling system silent as a newborn on a momma's titty, 150 PS3 game Library Installed, 50 Ps2 Game Library Installed, and 100 ps1 Game library Installed, Doesn't count my physical Collection - I's Set nukka
Sony stansthe fact the xbots dont even keep their previous trash can systems, that they bought 3-4 times over their lifespans, due to them being poorly manufactured but be so gun ho about being able to play them old games on their newer trashboxes
Kind of a weird take. PC emulators don't have to go for full accuracy, Sony would be aiming for that. Which considering how the Cell runs would probably raise the cost of the console. Sure they could port some type of RCPS3 software joint to it but it's not what would be expected from a company that owns the architecture.Random internet nikkas got a PS3 working on relatively weak hardware. Sony has a working emulator in the cloud that’s how psnow works.
It’s a long running Sony stan myth that cell was just too powerful/difficult to emulate. When in reality Sony just wants to sell remasters and psnow subscriptions.
It’s gonna be 2040 and people still want to play there Xbox 1 games on thereBackwards compatibility isnt a next-gen feature . Want to play a ps4 or ps3 game, buy a ps4 or ps3.
No emulator is perfect. Some inaccuracies would be expected. Again random people on the internet have a very respectable working emulator that you don’t need a top of the line computer to use. Sony could do it if they wanted, and no it wouldn’t raise the cost of the console.Kind of a weird take. PC emulators don't have to go for full accuracy, Sony would be aiming for that. Which considering how the Cell runs would probably raise the cost of the console. Sure they could port some type of RCPS3 software joint to it but it's not what would be expected from a company that owns the architecture.
What the fukk does that have to do with how PS Now works now?
How do you know thisNo emulator is perfect. Some inaccuracies would be expected. Again random people on the internet have a very respectable working emulator that you don’t need a top of the line computer to use. Sony could do it if they wanted, and no it wouldn’t raise the cost of the console.
You mean like this thing they had no problem selling to the massive for 100 bucks completely unoptimized.Kind of a weird take. PC emulators don't have to go for full accuracy, Sony would be aiming for that. Which considering how the Cell runs would probably raise the cost of the console. Sure they could port some type of RCPS3 software joint to it but it's not what would be expected from a company that owns the architecture.
I'm not excusing Sony for PS1 or PS2 read my post. Just the PS3. Plus some of that emulation was trash too, I don't have one thoughYou mean like this thing they had no problem selling to the massive for 100 bucks completely optimized.
The overall issue is sony can make more not worrying about back compat while reselling the same games, remakes and franchise in the future. Therefore the "fanbase" hold the L. Only the stan's don't really care because they love the brand and image and those that do want improved services gotta just hope for the best...